Valuation of Assets in German Start-Up Balance

According to German Commercial Code and International Financial Accounting Standards

Business & Finance, Accounting
Cover of the book Valuation of Assets in German Start-Up Balance by Andreas Laux, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Andreas Laux ISBN: 9783656125341
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: February 9, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: German
Author: Andreas Laux
ISBN: 9783656125341
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: February 9, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: German

Essay aus dem Jahr 2011 im Fachbereich BWL - Rechnungswesen, Bilanzierung, Steuern, , Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: Once a founder complies with their commitment to initial contribution in the form of contribution in kind, a question arises about valuation of this in-kind contribution. Given the principle of continuity in fiscal statements between initial balance sheet and future annual statements, valuation of such in-kind contributions needs to refer to provisions of commercial law. However, §§ 242 and 253 of German Commercial Code (HGB) only provide general guidelines to refer in the measurement of in-kind contributions at enterprise formation to acquisition costs, which gives rise to the term of notional acquisition cost. With the regulation gap this leaves, the in-kind contributions can essentially be measured freely under common provisions. The values notional acquisition cost may assume range from fair value as maximum limit to the lower issue price of the shares subscribed as far as hidden reserves have been created. The author undertakes a comparison of the aims in financial reporting to HGB and IFRS respectively in as far as relevant to valuation of the in-kind contributions, explores the different views on the scope of notional acquisition cost and extracts from the aims of financial reporting to the core question about the essential allowability of hidden reserves in initial balance sheet the key decision making criterion to refer to in valuation of the in-kind contributions. The descriptive exploration of the different views in existing sources as to the scope of notional acquisition costs and the comparative analysis of pertinent provisions of HGB and IFRS respectively give rise to the author's conclusion and requirement to valuate the in-kind contributions at fair value.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay aus dem Jahr 2011 im Fachbereich BWL - Rechnungswesen, Bilanzierung, Steuern, , Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: Once a founder complies with their commitment to initial contribution in the form of contribution in kind, a question arises about valuation of this in-kind contribution. Given the principle of continuity in fiscal statements between initial balance sheet and future annual statements, valuation of such in-kind contributions needs to refer to provisions of commercial law. However, §§ 242 and 253 of German Commercial Code (HGB) only provide general guidelines to refer in the measurement of in-kind contributions at enterprise formation to acquisition costs, which gives rise to the term of notional acquisition cost. With the regulation gap this leaves, the in-kind contributions can essentially be measured freely under common provisions. The values notional acquisition cost may assume range from fair value as maximum limit to the lower issue price of the shares subscribed as far as hidden reserves have been created. The author undertakes a comparison of the aims in financial reporting to HGB and IFRS respectively in as far as relevant to valuation of the in-kind contributions, explores the different views on the scope of notional acquisition cost and extracts from the aims of financial reporting to the core question about the essential allowability of hidden reserves in initial balance sheet the key decision making criterion to refer to in valuation of the in-kind contributions. The descriptive exploration of the different views in existing sources as to the scope of notional acquisition costs and the comparative analysis of pertinent provisions of HGB and IFRS respectively give rise to the author's conclusion and requirement to valuate the in-kind contributions at fair value.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Praktikumsbericht und Facharbeit zum Blockpraktikum im Fach Englisch: Der Status des verstehendes Lesens im modernen FU by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Strukturierte soziale Ungleichheit - Ein Produkt der Moderne by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Die Fünfprozentklausel bei Bundestagswahlen in Deutschland by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Frühförderung sozial benachteiligter Kinder. Eine Herausforderung an die Lernbehindertenpädagogik? by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Zur Spieltheorie by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Strategische Erfolgsfaktoren der XY AG & Co. KG by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Mathematik spielerisch trainieren by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Der Transfer von Kreditrisiken - Systemische Risiken und Reformvorschläge by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Begriff und Bedeutung des Preismanagements im Rahmen des Marketing Mix by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Konzeption und Reflexion einer Unterrichtseinheit zum Thema: Welche Bedeutung haben Urheberrecht und Pressefreiheit für unsere demokratische Gesellschaft? by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Softwareprozesse und Projektmanagement - Reviews/Inspections by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Bilanzanalyse am Beispiel LHT nach IAS by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Die Bedeutung des Konzepts der Ökonomie der Aufmerksamkeit für die systemische Organisationsberatung by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Gesundheitsorientiertes Ausdauertraining by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Resolving land disputes through alternative dispute resolution (ADR). An overview of Tanzania's legal framework by Andreas Laux
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy