Is Grammaticalization Unidirectional?

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Study Aids, ESL, Foreign Languages
Cover of the book Is Grammaticalization Unidirectional? by Kim Frintrop, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Kim Frintrop ISBN: 9783656755807
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: September 29, 2014
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Kim Frintrop
ISBN: 9783656755807
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: September 29, 2014
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2014 in the subject English - Pedagogy, Didactics, Literature Studies, grade: 1,7, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, course: Seminar English Linguistics, language: English, abstract: Grammaticalization is a well-attested process of language change and presents a complex sub-field of linguistics. Although grammaticalization is believed to be a rather young area of linguistics, its history is as old as the history of linguistics (cf. Narrog & Heine 2011: 1). The term 'grammaticalization' itself was apparently first coined by the French linguist Meillet, a pioneer in the field of grammaticalization. In his work L'évolution des formes grammaticales (1912), Meillet describes the process of grammaticalization as 'Le passage d'un mot autonome au rôle d'élément grammatical' (1912: 131 cited in Ferraresi 2014: 1) indicating a change of an erstwhile autonomous sign into a grammatical element. A more recent definition of grammaticalization is given by Hopper and Traugott who define it as 'the process whereby lexical items and constructions come in certain linguistic contexts to serve grammatical functions, and, once grammaticalized, continue to develop new grammatical functions' (2008: xv). Although the field of grammaticalization is already widely explored, its studies remain interesting since several of them have been the subject of critical discussions. One of the most interesting and challenging hypotheses in grammaticalization studies is presented by the unidirectionality hypothesis: 'the claim that changes that fall into the category of grammaticalization always move into the direction - from more to less lexical or from less grammatical to more grammatical' (Börjars & Vincent 2011: 163). However, is it not possible for a grammatical item to become less grammatical or even lexical? On the basis of Norde's recent study on degrammaticalization (2009; 2012), the paper will take a closer look whether the unidirectionality hypothesis is entirely true or not. The following paper is structured as follows: section two provides a brief overview of central concepts and definitions involved in grammaticalization and finally it presents Lehmann's parameters of grammaticalization (1995). In section three, the paper features a central approach on how the unidirectionality hypothesis can be explained. Section four presents two valid counterexamples of the unidirectionality hypothesis with respect to Lehmann's parameters (1995). To conclude, the paper summarizes the main results.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2014 in the subject English - Pedagogy, Didactics, Literature Studies, grade: 1,7, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, course: Seminar English Linguistics, language: English, abstract: Grammaticalization is a well-attested process of language change and presents a complex sub-field of linguistics. Although grammaticalization is believed to be a rather young area of linguistics, its history is as old as the history of linguistics (cf. Narrog & Heine 2011: 1). The term 'grammaticalization' itself was apparently first coined by the French linguist Meillet, a pioneer in the field of grammaticalization. In his work L'évolution des formes grammaticales (1912), Meillet describes the process of grammaticalization as 'Le passage d'un mot autonome au rôle d'élément grammatical' (1912: 131 cited in Ferraresi 2014: 1) indicating a change of an erstwhile autonomous sign into a grammatical element. A more recent definition of grammaticalization is given by Hopper and Traugott who define it as 'the process whereby lexical items and constructions come in certain linguistic contexts to serve grammatical functions, and, once grammaticalized, continue to develop new grammatical functions' (2008: xv). Although the field of grammaticalization is already widely explored, its studies remain interesting since several of them have been the subject of critical discussions. One of the most interesting and challenging hypotheses in grammaticalization studies is presented by the unidirectionality hypothesis: 'the claim that changes that fall into the category of grammaticalization always move into the direction - from more to less lexical or from less grammatical to more grammatical' (Börjars & Vincent 2011: 163). However, is it not possible for a grammatical item to become less grammatical or even lexical? On the basis of Norde's recent study on degrammaticalization (2009; 2012), the paper will take a closer look whether the unidirectionality hypothesis is entirely true or not. The following paper is structured as follows: section two provides a brief overview of central concepts and definitions involved in grammaticalization and finally it presents Lehmann's parameters of grammaticalization (1995). In section three, the paper features a central approach on how the unidirectionality hypothesis can be explained. Section four presents two valid counterexamples of the unidirectionality hypothesis with respect to Lehmann's parameters (1995). To conclude, the paper summarizes the main results.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Empfinden der Wohnzufriedenheit aus der Perspektive von Menschen mit geistiger Behinderung by Kim Frintrop
Cover of the book Die friedliche Revolution in der DDR by Kim Frintrop
Cover of the book Die Heilung eines Blinden im Religionsunterricht der Grundschule. Exegese und Unterrichtsentwurf zu Mk 10, 46-52 by Kim Frintrop
Cover of the book Neuer Kalter Krieg - alte Strategien und Strukturen? by Kim Frintrop
Cover of the book The Politics Responsible for the Rejection of the Keystone XL Pipeline by Kim Frintrop
Cover of the book Theodor W. Adornos Erziehung nach Auschwitz und Erziehung zur Mündigkeit by Kim Frintrop
Cover of the book Grundlagentexte der Cultural Studies im Macht-Wissens-Kontext by Kim Frintrop
Cover of the book Internationale Vertragsverhandlung und -gestaltung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Zahlung und Mangelfolgeschaden by Kim Frintrop
Cover of the book Bilanzpolitische Möglichkeiten bei der Abbildung von Vorräten im IFRS-Jahresabschluss nach IAS 2 by Kim Frintrop
Cover of the book Schubert and his Works for the Stage by Kim Frintrop
Cover of the book Die UN-Klimakonferenz auf Bali im Jahr 2007 in der Medienberichterstattung by Kim Frintrop
Cover of the book Der Zusammenhang von Lebensstil und Sozialstruktur by Kim Frintrop
Cover of the book Die Glaubensprüfung des Hiob. Exegetische Untersuchung von Hiob 6-7 by Kim Frintrop
Cover of the book Metasomatose im Erdmantel. Petrographie von Südafrikanischen MARID-Xenolithen by Kim Frintrop
Cover of the book Die Geburt des modernen Buchhandels by Kim Frintrop
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy