Valuation of Assets in German Start-Up Balance

According to German Commercial Code and International Financial Accounting Standards

Business & Finance, Accounting
Cover of the book Valuation of Assets in German Start-Up Balance by Andreas Laux, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Andreas Laux ISBN: 9783656125341
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: February 9, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: German
Author: Andreas Laux
ISBN: 9783656125341
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: February 9, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: German

Essay aus dem Jahr 2011 im Fachbereich BWL - Rechnungswesen, Bilanzierung, Steuern, , Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: Once a founder complies with their commitment to initial contribution in the form of contribution in kind, a question arises about valuation of this in-kind contribution. Given the principle of continuity in fiscal statements between initial balance sheet and future annual statements, valuation of such in-kind contributions needs to refer to provisions of commercial law. However, §§ 242 and 253 of German Commercial Code (HGB) only provide general guidelines to refer in the measurement of in-kind contributions at enterprise formation to acquisition costs, which gives rise to the term of notional acquisition cost. With the regulation gap this leaves, the in-kind contributions can essentially be measured freely under common provisions. The values notional acquisition cost may assume range from fair value as maximum limit to the lower issue price of the shares subscribed as far as hidden reserves have been created. The author undertakes a comparison of the aims in financial reporting to HGB and IFRS respectively in as far as relevant to valuation of the in-kind contributions, explores the different views on the scope of notional acquisition cost and extracts from the aims of financial reporting to the core question about the essential allowability of hidden reserves in initial balance sheet the key decision making criterion to refer to in valuation of the in-kind contributions. The descriptive exploration of the different views in existing sources as to the scope of notional acquisition costs and the comparative analysis of pertinent provisions of HGB and IFRS respectively give rise to the author's conclusion and requirement to valuate the in-kind contributions at fair value.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay aus dem Jahr 2011 im Fachbereich BWL - Rechnungswesen, Bilanzierung, Steuern, , Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: Once a founder complies with their commitment to initial contribution in the form of contribution in kind, a question arises about valuation of this in-kind contribution. Given the principle of continuity in fiscal statements between initial balance sheet and future annual statements, valuation of such in-kind contributions needs to refer to provisions of commercial law. However, §§ 242 and 253 of German Commercial Code (HGB) only provide general guidelines to refer in the measurement of in-kind contributions at enterprise formation to acquisition costs, which gives rise to the term of notional acquisition cost. With the regulation gap this leaves, the in-kind contributions can essentially be measured freely under common provisions. The values notional acquisition cost may assume range from fair value as maximum limit to the lower issue price of the shares subscribed as far as hidden reserves have been created. The author undertakes a comparison of the aims in financial reporting to HGB and IFRS respectively in as far as relevant to valuation of the in-kind contributions, explores the different views on the scope of notional acquisition cost and extracts from the aims of financial reporting to the core question about the essential allowability of hidden reserves in initial balance sheet the key decision making criterion to refer to in valuation of the in-kind contributions. The descriptive exploration of the different views in existing sources as to the scope of notional acquisition costs and the comparative analysis of pertinent provisions of HGB and IFRS respectively give rise to the author's conclusion and requirement to valuate the in-kind contributions at fair value.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Die Balanced Scorecard zur Ableitung mittelfristiger Ziele by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Das Eherecht des Konkordats von 1855 und die Rechtsstellung religiöser Minderheiten by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Die Geschichte der Solidarität by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Die Relevanz einer allgemeinen Sakramententheologie. Die liturgiewissenschaftliche Betrachtung und die gesellschaftlichen und kulturellen Einwände by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Fehlermöglichkeits- und -einflussanalyse als Methode der Qualitätsverbesserung by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Zur Position des kommerziellen Kinderhörspiels im Deutschland der 80er Jahre by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Beratung als Medienangebot - Inhalte, Beurteilung, Akzeptanz by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Bearbeitung einer Kundenanfrage (Unterweisung Hotelfachmann / -fachfrau) by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Vergleichende Rezension von Dickopp 'SYSTEMATISCHE PÄDAGOGIK' und Baumgard 'ERZIEHUNGS- UND BILDUNGSTHEORIEN' by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Das Vaterunser - Exegese zu Mt. 6, 9-13 mit Bezugnahme auf Lk. 11,2-4 by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Das Gewicht der PISA-Studie by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Ursachen und Motive aggressiven Verhaltens bei Fussballfans by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Zum Werk von Kenichi Ohmae 'Was kommt nach der Globalisierung?' by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Wohlstand und Armut der Nationen by Andreas Laux
Cover of the book Die Finanzierung des Krankheitsrisikos vor dem Hintergrund der demographischen Entwicklung by Andreas Laux
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy