Wither Power Politics?

A Study of the United States' Approach to the Caspian Sea Region 1991-2001

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Security
Cover of the book Wither Power Politics? by Bradley Axmith, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Bradley Axmith ISBN: 9783656343165
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: January 2, 2013
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Bradley Axmith
ISBN: 9783656343165
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: January 2, 2013
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Master's Thesis from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, , course: US Foreign Policy, International Relations in the Caspian Sea Region, language: English, abstract: The New Great Game in the Caspian Sea Region received moderate attention from scholars following the collapse of the Soviet Union because it resembled the continuation of rivalry between Washington and Moscow. For the eight Caspian republics, the discovery of vast oil and gas deposits was the key to securing the newly independent states' sovereignty away from Moscow's control toward integration with Europe and the United States. This thesis analyses the US' treatment of the Caspian Sea Region between 1991 and 2001, in order to measure whether its policies were crafted according to Realist tenets in formulating policy designed to advance its security. The historical record seen through Offensive Realism presents evidence that US foreign policy was governed by principles not balance of power considerations, led by the false notion that democratic Russia would act in accordance with US goals. Intent on fostering democracy in Russia the United States denied the competitive nature of international politics, refusing to criticize abuses by Moscow in the region and failing to intervene when US interests were marginalised. The US failed to prevent Russia from refashioning conditions conducive to the reabsorption of the Caucasus and Central Asia as a sphere of influence; nor did it account for China's expanded role and trajectory as a challenge to US power. This analysis shows, for example, that Russia's proximity and willingness to use force exceeded the capabilities of the US' use of its global predominance to shape regional events.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Master's Thesis from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, , course: US Foreign Policy, International Relations in the Caspian Sea Region, language: English, abstract: The New Great Game in the Caspian Sea Region received moderate attention from scholars following the collapse of the Soviet Union because it resembled the continuation of rivalry between Washington and Moscow. For the eight Caspian republics, the discovery of vast oil and gas deposits was the key to securing the newly independent states' sovereignty away from Moscow's control toward integration with Europe and the United States. This thesis analyses the US' treatment of the Caspian Sea Region between 1991 and 2001, in order to measure whether its policies were crafted according to Realist tenets in formulating policy designed to advance its security. The historical record seen through Offensive Realism presents evidence that US foreign policy was governed by principles not balance of power considerations, led by the false notion that democratic Russia would act in accordance with US goals. Intent on fostering democracy in Russia the United States denied the competitive nature of international politics, refusing to criticize abuses by Moscow in the region and failing to intervene when US interests were marginalised. The US failed to prevent Russia from refashioning conditions conducive to the reabsorption of the Caucasus and Central Asia as a sphere of influence; nor did it account for China's expanded role and trajectory as a challenge to US power. This analysis shows, for example, that Russia's proximity and willingness to use force exceeded the capabilities of the US' use of its global predominance to shape regional events.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Die politische Ordnung der Ukraine by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Außenpolitische Kompetenzen der Exekutive im deutschamerikanischen Vergleich by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book 'Was ist es denn mit den Gehirnen?' by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Business Intelligence vs. Self Service Business Intelligence by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book 'Die Kreuzabnahme': Die Gemälde von Peter Paul Rubens und Rembrandt van Rijn - ein Vergleich by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Linkage zwischen Staat und Gesellschaft by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Epilepsie-Update by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Regionale Implikationen der Atomprogramme Indiens und Pakistans am Beispiel der nuklearen Ambitionen Irans seit der Regierungszeit von Sh?h Mohammad Rez? Pahlav? by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Macht und Herrschaft vor dem Hintergrund der Internationalen Beziehungen by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Die Darstellung der Frau in der deutschen Werbung by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Planwirtschaft und ihr Alltag by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Gibt es den gerechten Krieg? by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Das Menschenbild Nietzsches by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Methoden der Stichprobenkonstruktion II by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Sitz der Brehnaer Grafschaft in Herzberg? by Bradley Axmith
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy