Wither Power Politics?

A Study of the United States' Approach to the Caspian Sea Region 1991-2001

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Security
Cover of the book Wither Power Politics? by Bradley Axmith, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Bradley Axmith ISBN: 9783656343165
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: January 2, 2013
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Bradley Axmith
ISBN: 9783656343165
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: January 2, 2013
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Master's Thesis from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, , course: US Foreign Policy, International Relations in the Caspian Sea Region, language: English, abstract: The New Great Game in the Caspian Sea Region received moderate attention from scholars following the collapse of the Soviet Union because it resembled the continuation of rivalry between Washington and Moscow. For the eight Caspian republics, the discovery of vast oil and gas deposits was the key to securing the newly independent states' sovereignty away from Moscow's control toward integration with Europe and the United States. This thesis analyses the US' treatment of the Caspian Sea Region between 1991 and 2001, in order to measure whether its policies were crafted according to Realist tenets in formulating policy designed to advance its security. The historical record seen through Offensive Realism presents evidence that US foreign policy was governed by principles not balance of power considerations, led by the false notion that democratic Russia would act in accordance with US goals. Intent on fostering democracy in Russia the United States denied the competitive nature of international politics, refusing to criticize abuses by Moscow in the region and failing to intervene when US interests were marginalised. The US failed to prevent Russia from refashioning conditions conducive to the reabsorption of the Caucasus and Central Asia as a sphere of influence; nor did it account for China's expanded role and trajectory as a challenge to US power. This analysis shows, for example, that Russia's proximity and willingness to use force exceeded the capabilities of the US' use of its global predominance to shape regional events.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Master's Thesis from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, , course: US Foreign Policy, International Relations in the Caspian Sea Region, language: English, abstract: The New Great Game in the Caspian Sea Region received moderate attention from scholars following the collapse of the Soviet Union because it resembled the continuation of rivalry between Washington and Moscow. For the eight Caspian republics, the discovery of vast oil and gas deposits was the key to securing the newly independent states' sovereignty away from Moscow's control toward integration with Europe and the United States. This thesis analyses the US' treatment of the Caspian Sea Region between 1991 and 2001, in order to measure whether its policies were crafted according to Realist tenets in formulating policy designed to advance its security. The historical record seen through Offensive Realism presents evidence that US foreign policy was governed by principles not balance of power considerations, led by the false notion that democratic Russia would act in accordance with US goals. Intent on fostering democracy in Russia the United States denied the competitive nature of international politics, refusing to criticize abuses by Moscow in the region and failing to intervene when US interests were marginalised. The US failed to prevent Russia from refashioning conditions conducive to the reabsorption of the Caucasus and Central Asia as a sphere of influence; nor did it account for China's expanded role and trajectory as a challenge to US power. This analysis shows, for example, that Russia's proximity and willingness to use force exceeded the capabilities of the US' use of its global predominance to shape regional events.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Projekte zur Hausaufgabenbetreuung in der Stadt Augsburg - Eine qualitative Untersuchung ausgewählter Einrichtungen by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Kritischer Vergleich der Bilanzierung von Sicherungsbeziehungen nach IFRS und HGB unter Berücksichtigung der Regelungen im Regierungsentwurf zum BilMoG by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Alternative Beurteilungsformen by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Grundzüge der Persönlichkeitspsychologie by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Die Verfügbarkeit der Lust bei Epikur by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Krisendebatte über die Berufsproblematik by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Brutalität, Maskerade und Dominanz - über das unterschiedliche Verhalten der Frauen in Petronius' Satyricon reliquiae by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Art in Sinclair Ross's 'As for Me and My House' and Lorna Crozier's 'A Saving Grace' by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Religionsfreiheit in Deutschland by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Flächeninhalt von Rechtecken. Übung und Vertiefung im Mathematikunterricht (Klasse 4) by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Der sowjetische Einmarsch in Afghanistan unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der 'Carter-Doktrin' by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Berufliche Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Mehrstufige Deckungsbeitragsrechnung by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Geschlechterrollen in der TV-Werbung by Bradley Axmith
Cover of the book Datenschutz in Social Networks by Bradley Axmith
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy