The European Economic and Social Committee - A sufficient institution for participation?

A sufficient institution for participation?

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book The European Economic and Social Committee - A sufficient institution for participation? by Daniel Neugebauer, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Daniel Neugebauer ISBN: 9783638627740
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: March 16, 2007
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Daniel Neugebauer
ISBN: 9783638627740
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: March 16, 2007
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Essay from the year 2007 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 2,0, University of Twente (Bedrijf Bestuur en Technologie), course: European Institutions, 7 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Although the European Economic and Social Committee exists since 1957, there is only scarce literature on this institution. While in the 80s and 90s a few articles and books were published, there has been hardly any literature since 2000. This mere fact may already provide an indication of the Committee's role in today's institutional structure of the European Union: Civil society has found other ways of representation. On the one hand, formal ways of participating in the decision making process increased, for instance through the various consultative bodies around the European Commission. On the other hand, informal participation through lobbying has grown and is often regarded as being more profitable and more efficient than the involvement of an assembly with 344 members which has to agree with a majority on its opinions. Not only on this account is the work of the EESC facing critics. Under the heading 'Four good reasons to abolish the Economic and Social Committee', Helle Thorning-Schmidt (2003), member of the European Convention and European Parliament, challenges the Committee's right to exist. Her accusations are profound: Unfocused, too expensive, inefficient and not sufficiently European was the EESC's work. Other authors are not so pessimistic. Vierlich-Jürcke (1998) refers to the Committee's ability to 'democratize' the decision making system in the European Union by fostering the dialogue between government and the public. Smismans (2000) agrees on these positive effects, but is in favour of some changes to the composition of the Committee. He wants to strengthen links between civil society, broaden the deliberative basis and bring more expertise. He states that an increased input-legitimacy contributes to output-legitimacy. On a more abstract basis, the critics are not only about efficiency and legitimacy. The question whether the Committee has (still) a right to exist touches the concept of democracy we want to establish in the European Union. The EU has been a 'participatory democracy' from the beginning, and the Constitution's article 46 again strengthens possibilities to participate.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay from the year 2007 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 2,0, University of Twente (Bedrijf Bestuur en Technologie), course: European Institutions, 7 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Although the European Economic and Social Committee exists since 1957, there is only scarce literature on this institution. While in the 80s and 90s a few articles and books were published, there has been hardly any literature since 2000. This mere fact may already provide an indication of the Committee's role in today's institutional structure of the European Union: Civil society has found other ways of representation. On the one hand, formal ways of participating in the decision making process increased, for instance through the various consultative bodies around the European Commission. On the other hand, informal participation through lobbying has grown and is often regarded as being more profitable and more efficient than the involvement of an assembly with 344 members which has to agree with a majority on its opinions. Not only on this account is the work of the EESC facing critics. Under the heading 'Four good reasons to abolish the Economic and Social Committee', Helle Thorning-Schmidt (2003), member of the European Convention and European Parliament, challenges the Committee's right to exist. Her accusations are profound: Unfocused, too expensive, inefficient and not sufficiently European was the EESC's work. Other authors are not so pessimistic. Vierlich-Jürcke (1998) refers to the Committee's ability to 'democratize' the decision making system in the European Union by fostering the dialogue between government and the public. Smismans (2000) agrees on these positive effects, but is in favour of some changes to the composition of the Committee. He wants to strengthen links between civil society, broaden the deliberative basis and bring more expertise. He states that an increased input-legitimacy contributes to output-legitimacy. On a more abstract basis, the critics are not only about efficiency and legitimacy. The question whether the Committee has (still) a right to exist touches the concept of democracy we want to establish in the European Union. The EU has been a 'participatory democracy' from the beginning, and the Constitution's article 46 again strengthens possibilities to participate.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book How to develop a Human Resource Strategic Plan by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Das Konzept der Basalen Stimulation by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Die Zwei-Säulen-Strategie der Europäischen Zentralbank by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Was ist behavioristisches Denken? by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Möglichkeiten der konstruktiven Fehlerkorrektur und Einarbeitung fehlertherapeutischer und -prophylaktischer Maßnahmen in den Unterricht by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Die Sozialisationstheorie Pierre Bourdieus by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Chancen und Probleme des Programms 'Network Centric Operations Conceptual Framework Version 2.0' für das US-Militär by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Auswirkungen von Kooperationen zwischen GKV- und PKV-Unternehmen by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Außen- und Selbstwahrnehmung koreanischer und okinawanischer Identität by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Unterrichtsstunde: Kapitel 2 - 'Gute Zeiten' zur Unterrichtseinheit 'Sie nannten mich 'Es'' von Dave Pelzer by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Language assessment: Testing bilinguals? by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Das Modell der Kulturindustrie im Widerspruch zur gruppenspezifischen Differenziertheit by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Soziale Unsicherheit. Definition, Begleiterscheinungen, Verlauf by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Fernsehsucht oder - Emanzipation? Joshua Meyrowitz' 'Die Fernsehgesellschaft' im Spiegel von Heiko Michael Hartmanns Roman 'MOI' by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Sinn und Funktion von Systemen nach Niklas Luhmann by Daniel Neugebauer
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy