Structure vs Process - How to look at politics

Compare, contrast, and assess attempts by at least two anthropologists to analyse politics in terms of temporal processes rather than (a-temporal) structure.

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Education & Teaching
Cover of the book Structure vs Process - How to look at politics by Johannes Lenhard, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Johannes Lenhard ISBN: 9783656323792
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: November 28, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Johannes Lenhard
ISBN: 9783656323792
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: November 28, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Essay from the year 2012 in the subject Pedagogy - Science, Theory, Anthropology, grade: 65, University of Cambridge, language: English, abstract: Compare, contrast, and assess attempts by at least two anthropologists to analyse politics in terms of temporal processes rather than (a-temporal) structure. Edmund Leach published his account of the Kachin society in Highland Burma in 1954, fourteen years after Evans-Pritchard's and Fortes' classical structural-functionalist collection on 'African Political Systems'. Only four years after Leach, Barth's 'Swat Pathans' enters the debate. Both Barth and Leach differ remarkably in their methodological approach fousing on change and process. While Radcliffe-Brown (Fortes & Evans-Pritchard, 2006:vi) proclaims in his preface to 'African Political Systems' that the aim of anthropology is to 'discover the universal, essential, characters which belong to all human societies, past, present and future', Leach (Leach, 2004) heavily criticises the implicit underlying assumption of equilibrium. Instead, he focuses on the study of the 'constantly changing environment' and society as 'a process in time' (ibid.:5). As I will argue his process is still very much structural, however. In contrast to structure, Barth makes individual action his centre piece that aggregates to higher political levels in temporal processes. In the following analysis, I will complement my analysis of the two core texts mentioned above with methodological writings comparing Barth's and Leach's account of political processes in Pakistan and Burma respectively.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay from the year 2012 in the subject Pedagogy - Science, Theory, Anthropology, grade: 65, University of Cambridge, language: English, abstract: Compare, contrast, and assess attempts by at least two anthropologists to analyse politics in terms of temporal processes rather than (a-temporal) structure. Edmund Leach published his account of the Kachin society in Highland Burma in 1954, fourteen years after Evans-Pritchard's and Fortes' classical structural-functionalist collection on 'African Political Systems'. Only four years after Leach, Barth's 'Swat Pathans' enters the debate. Both Barth and Leach differ remarkably in their methodological approach fousing on change and process. While Radcliffe-Brown (Fortes & Evans-Pritchard, 2006:vi) proclaims in his preface to 'African Political Systems' that the aim of anthropology is to 'discover the universal, essential, characters which belong to all human societies, past, present and future', Leach (Leach, 2004) heavily criticises the implicit underlying assumption of equilibrium. Instead, he focuses on the study of the 'constantly changing environment' and society as 'a process in time' (ibid.:5). As I will argue his process is still very much structural, however. In contrast to structure, Barth makes individual action his centre piece that aggregates to higher political levels in temporal processes. In the following analysis, I will complement my analysis of the two core texts mentioned above with methodological writings comparing Barth's and Leach's account of political processes in Pakistan and Burma respectively.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book IFRS for SMEs als Alternative vor dem Hintergrund der BilMoG-Einführung by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Der fremdfinanzierte Management Buyout. Eine attraktive Anlagemöglichkeit für den Private Equity-Investor? by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Gedoppelte Agenten by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Literaturbericht zum Fachbuch 'Klientenzentrierte Gesprächsführung. Eine Lern- und Praxisanleitung für helfende Berufe. 8. Auflage' von Dr. Sabine Weinberger by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Der Symbolische Interaktionismus nach Herbert Blumer aus kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Sicht by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Struktur und Stabilität der Silikate by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Qigong in der Suchttherapie. Mertens' Modell zur Suchtentstehung und -therapie. Biophotonenforschung by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Unternehmensethik in internationalen Unternehmen by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Die NATO nach dem Ende des Ost-West-Konflikts by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Das Klima der Alpen by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Subjektivierung von Arbeit by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Gewaltprävention - welche Möglichkeiten gibt es für die Institution Schule? by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book 'Soziale Stadt' Witten-Annen. Bilanz des Bund-Länder-Programms 'Soziale Stadt' by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Investor Relations - das Spezialgebiet Investor Relations als Teildisziplin der Unternehmenskommunikation by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Die wirtschaftlichen, religiösen, kulturellen und ethnischen Merkmale der Gesellschaft des Staates Israel by Johannes Lenhard
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy