A Case for Underdetermination: Consequences of Opposing the Distinction between Quantum Mechanics and Bohmian Mechanics

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy
Cover of the book A Case for Underdetermination: Consequences of Opposing the Distinction between Quantum Mechanics and Bohmian Mechanics by Wiebke Schröder, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Wiebke Schröder ISBN: 9783656392781
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: March 18, 2013
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Wiebke Schröder
ISBN: 9783656392781
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: March 18, 2013
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2011 in the subject Philosophy - Theoretical (Realisation, Science, Logic, Language), grade: A, Indiana University (History and Philosophy of Science), course: Demons in Physics, language: English, abstract: In his article Must Evidence Underdetermine Theory? John D. Norton attempts to refute a certain version of the underdetermination thesis. He attacks the idea that all evidence necessarily underdetermines any scientific theory. In the first part of this paper, I want to call into question part of his argument in some general terms and then focus on a particular case of possible underdetermination, namely Quantum mechanics (QM) and Bohmian mechanics (BM), in order to strengthen my criticism of Norton. Norton himself does not take sides in the debate over the question whether or not QM and BM are essentially the same theory, but says the possibility that they are cannot be ruled out. I will show that Norton, both in his general argument as well as in his judgment in the 'QM/BM case', takes a certain notion of theory for granted that his opponents would not agree with. In addition, I will investigate further consequences resulting from his position. This part makes up the bulk of my paper. In a second part I attempt to refute Norton on his own grounds. That is, on the basis of his idea of what a theory is, I will show that one can preclude the possibility that QM and BM are the same theory. To be clear: This paper is not a defense of the underdetermination thesis, but rather a critique of Norton's attack.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2011 in the subject Philosophy - Theoretical (Realisation, Science, Logic, Language), grade: A, Indiana University (History and Philosophy of Science), course: Demons in Physics, language: English, abstract: In his article Must Evidence Underdetermine Theory? John D. Norton attempts to refute a certain version of the underdetermination thesis. He attacks the idea that all evidence necessarily underdetermines any scientific theory. In the first part of this paper, I want to call into question part of his argument in some general terms and then focus on a particular case of possible underdetermination, namely Quantum mechanics (QM) and Bohmian mechanics (BM), in order to strengthen my criticism of Norton. Norton himself does not take sides in the debate over the question whether or not QM and BM are essentially the same theory, but says the possibility that they are cannot be ruled out. I will show that Norton, both in his general argument as well as in his judgment in the 'QM/BM case', takes a certain notion of theory for granted that his opponents would not agree with. In addition, I will investigate further consequences resulting from his position. This part makes up the bulk of my paper. In a second part I attempt to refute Norton on his own grounds. That is, on the basis of his idea of what a theory is, I will show that one can preclude the possibility that QM and BM are the same theory. To be clear: This paper is not a defense of the underdetermination thesis, but rather a critique of Norton's attack.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Lieferantenbewertung (Unterweisung Bürokaufmann / -kauffrau) by Wiebke Schröder
Cover of the book Das Instrumental-Rezitativ in den Clavierwerken Carl Ph. E. Bachs und Wilhelm F. Bach by Wiebke Schröder
Cover of the book Die Steuerliche Verlustnutzung beim Kauf einer Kapitalgesellschaft by Wiebke Schröder
Cover of the book Erziehung und Kommunikation by Wiebke Schröder
Cover of the book Ermutigung, Motivation, Selbsterfüllung. Unterschiede und Koppelung by Wiebke Schröder
Cover of the book Erfolgschancen von Premium-Handelsmarken im deutschen Lebensmittel- und Bekleidungshandel by Wiebke Schröder
Cover of the book Die Thematik der 'toten Winkel' beim LKW by Wiebke Schröder
Cover of the book Kinderkatechismen im Religionsunterricht by Wiebke Schröder
Cover of the book Die Vergangenheitsbewältigung in Frankreich - Der französische Algerienkrieg: Kultur der Erinnerung oder Kunst des Vergessens? by Wiebke Schröder
Cover of the book Theorien der Leistungsmotivation: Förderung von misserfolgsmotivierten Grundschülern by Wiebke Schröder
Cover of the book Unterrichtsstunde: Kraulbeinschlag by Wiebke Schröder
Cover of the book Hausarbeit Fitnesstrainer B-Lizenz by Wiebke Schröder
Cover of the book Bildnis des Federico da Montefeltro und der Battista Sforza von Piero della Francesca by Wiebke Schröder
Cover of the book Maria Montessoris Leben und Werk by Wiebke Schröder
Cover of the book Die Herzöge von Mecklenburg und die Reformation in der Hansestadt Rostock by Wiebke Schröder
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy