The Politics Responsible for the Rejection of the Keystone XL Pipeline

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book The Politics Responsible for the Rejection of the Keystone XL Pipeline by Michael Kennedy, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Michael Kennedy ISBN: 9783656336532
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: December 19, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Michael Kennedy
ISBN: 9783656336532
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: December 19, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Research Paper (undergraduate) from the year 2012 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: USA, grade: A, Webster University, course: U.S. Foreign Policy, language: English, abstract: TransCanada Corporation's Keystone XL Pipeline is a highly contentious matter in Canada and the United States as its proposed construction has been fraught with economic, environmental, and political issues. Since the pipeline was first proposed in 2008 as an extension of the already constructed Keystone Pipeline, the Keystone XL Pipeline has been most strongly opposed by environmental groups and certain political figures. Pressure from these various groups was largely responsible for U.S. President Barack Obama's decision in November 2011 to reject the immediate construction of the pipeline and instead postpone the decision to 2013. The postponementto construct the pipeline waslargely a decision to conduct further investigations of the environmental concerns that opponents to the pipeline have raised. Those in support of the pipeline have suggested that the postponement to 2013 was merely a political ploy in order to avoid the pipeline issue, while appeasing environmentalists, until after the 2012 presidential election. Regardless of the president's reason to delay the pipeline,relations with Canada have been negatively affected, it has continued to solidify U.S. dependence on foreign oil in comparatively more volatile regions, and has increased the Republican-dominated Congress's pressure on the president. These opposing pressures appear to have had a heavy influence on the Obama administration as it now seems that a certain degree of policy backpedalling is evident while the president attempts to appease both sides of the debate.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Research Paper (undergraduate) from the year 2012 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: USA, grade: A, Webster University, course: U.S. Foreign Policy, language: English, abstract: TransCanada Corporation's Keystone XL Pipeline is a highly contentious matter in Canada and the United States as its proposed construction has been fraught with economic, environmental, and political issues. Since the pipeline was first proposed in 2008 as an extension of the already constructed Keystone Pipeline, the Keystone XL Pipeline has been most strongly opposed by environmental groups and certain political figures. Pressure from these various groups was largely responsible for U.S. President Barack Obama's decision in November 2011 to reject the immediate construction of the pipeline and instead postpone the decision to 2013. The postponementto construct the pipeline waslargely a decision to conduct further investigations of the environmental concerns that opponents to the pipeline have raised. Those in support of the pipeline have suggested that the postponement to 2013 was merely a political ploy in order to avoid the pipeline issue, while appeasing environmentalists, until after the 2012 presidential election. Regardless of the president's reason to delay the pipeline,relations with Canada have been negatively affected, it has continued to solidify U.S. dependence on foreign oil in comparatively more volatile regions, and has increased the Republican-dominated Congress's pressure on the president. These opposing pressures appear to have had a heavy influence on the Obama administration as it now seems that a certain degree of policy backpedalling is evident while the president attempts to appease both sides of the debate.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Dachfonds? Sinnvolle Diversifikation by Michael Kennedy
Cover of the book Die Emissionsgenehmigung nach dem TEHG by Michael Kennedy
Cover of the book Event-Marketing am Beispiel eines imagefördernden Events der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg by Michael Kennedy
Cover of the book Das Zeitalter Schuberts - Zwischen Revolution und Restauration by Michael Kennedy
Cover of the book 'Kölner Schüler engagieren sich!' Kinder einer Grundschule begegnen Senioren by Michael Kennedy
Cover of the book Der Arabische Frühling. Eine Facebook-Revolution? by Michael Kennedy
Cover of the book Erfanden die Briten den 'Hinduismus'? by Michael Kennedy
Cover of the book Kuwait. Analyse eines Scheichtums in sozio-ökonomischer und historisch-politischer Perspektive vom 18. Jahrhundert bis zur Öltransformation by Michael Kennedy
Cover of the book Aggressives Verhalten als Unterrichtsstörung by Michael Kennedy
Cover of the book Der Krieg in Tschetschenien by Michael Kennedy
Cover of the book Who is an Intellectual and what should the Role of Intellectuals be in Society? by Michael Kennedy
Cover of the book Rhetorik zwischen Didaktik, Philosophie und praktischer Umsetzung in der Schule by Michael Kennedy
Cover of the book Ein Einblick in das Welt- und Gottesbild des Manichäismus by Michael Kennedy
Cover of the book Religiöse Fachbegriffe als interkulturelles Problem im Schulunterricht by Michael Kennedy
Cover of the book Unterschiedliche Formen von Arbeitsgruppen by Michael Kennedy
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy