On Gerhard Richter's Blur Effect. The Ambivalent Character of a Distanced Force

Nonfiction, Art & Architecture, General Art, Art Technique
Cover of the book On Gerhard Richter's Blur Effect. The Ambivalent Character of a Distanced Force by Sarah Doerfel, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Sarah Doerfel ISBN: 9783656610182
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: March 6, 2014
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Sarah Doerfel
ISBN: 9783656610182
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: March 6, 2014
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Bachelor Thesis from the year 2013 in the subject Art - Photography and Film, grade: 78 % = 1, University of Westminster (Department of Media, Arts and Design), course: Photography Dissertation, language: English, abstract: 'The strongest of Richter's effects of withdrawing the work from the viewer's gaze, is the creation of a softening blur as the final touch to all his Photo Paintings. Making the paintings, the artist firstly drafts his subject with a normally sized brush to create a 'sharp' image (Fig.3). Having finished, he would come with a broader brush or a squeegee and blur the still wet oil paint (Fig. 4) to create the photographic effect of an out-of-focus image1. The blur in these paintings is not a trace of movement of the object in the photograph. This blur is an addition to the painting that does not relate to a form of haziness in the specific photographic source image, but to the general idea of vagueness, indecisiveness, anti-definition. Therefore, it mirrors the artist's attitudes towards life in an especially expressive way. The enlargement of the usual distance between what is depicted and the viewer are the basis of this effect. At first on a quite literal level: Richter introduces another layer of depiction in these paintings by creating the depiction of a depiction of an object. This places the object of the painting further away than usual from its maker and us as viewers (Butin, 2010). Secondly, on the level of reception: an image that stays 'out-of-focus' from whichever distance we look at it rejects us, and refuses to communicate. This typical caginess of Richter's paintings, the exclusion of the recipient whom they are made for, is a striking effect in the encounter with these images. The analysis of the antithetic emotional effects of this simple but fascinating painterly technique is the theme of this essay.'

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Bachelor Thesis from the year 2013 in the subject Art - Photography and Film, grade: 78 % = 1, University of Westminster (Department of Media, Arts and Design), course: Photography Dissertation, language: English, abstract: 'The strongest of Richter's effects of withdrawing the work from the viewer's gaze, is the creation of a softening blur as the final touch to all his Photo Paintings. Making the paintings, the artist firstly drafts his subject with a normally sized brush to create a 'sharp' image (Fig.3). Having finished, he would come with a broader brush or a squeegee and blur the still wet oil paint (Fig. 4) to create the photographic effect of an out-of-focus image1. The blur in these paintings is not a trace of movement of the object in the photograph. This blur is an addition to the painting that does not relate to a form of haziness in the specific photographic source image, but to the general idea of vagueness, indecisiveness, anti-definition. Therefore, it mirrors the artist's attitudes towards life in an especially expressive way. The enlargement of the usual distance between what is depicted and the viewer are the basis of this effect. At first on a quite literal level: Richter introduces another layer of depiction in these paintings by creating the depiction of a depiction of an object. This places the object of the painting further away than usual from its maker and us as viewers (Butin, 2010). Secondly, on the level of reception: an image that stays 'out-of-focus' from whichever distance we look at it rejects us, and refuses to communicate. This typical caginess of Richter's paintings, the exclusion of the recipient whom they are made for, is a striking effect in the encounter with these images. The analysis of the antithetic emotional effects of this simple but fascinating painterly technique is the theme of this essay.'

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Schutz der Aktiengesellschaft vor Berufsklägern by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Yosano Akiko und die Debatte um die Frauenrechte by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Über Peter Paul Rubens: 'Der Medici-Zyklus' by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Krieg, Ökonomie und Politik in Afrika by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book 'Ich kenne die Zahlen bis 1000!' by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Grundlagen zu Verrechnungspreisen für immaterielle Wirtschaftsgüter by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Anforderungen an die Beweisführung einer Diskriminierung by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Carlo Mierendorff (1897-1943) - Zwei biographische Texte by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Das Dopingproblem im Hochleistungssport by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Die Bindung Isaaks. Unterrichtsentwurf für eine zwölfte Klasse by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Das hörgeschädigte Kind im Kinderbuch als Gegenstand identitätsfördernder Maßnahmen im Unterricht für Hörgeschädigte by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Die Berlinkrise von 1948-1949 by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Die Autonomie des Bildungssystems bei Bourdieu und Luhmann by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book Die Haupthindernisse für die erfolgreiche Entwicklung der DDR-Wirtschaft by Sarah Doerfel
Cover of the book SWOT-Analyse, Franchise, Corporate Identity, Marketingstrategien by Sarah Doerfel
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy