Design science in management research

Business & Finance, Management & Leadership, Management
Cover of the book Design science in management research by Markus Karmann, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Markus Karmann ISBN: 9783656411253
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: April 17, 2013
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Markus Karmann
ISBN: 9783656411253
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: April 17, 2013
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2013 in the subject Business economics - Business Management, Corporate Governance, grade: 1,0, European School of Business Reutlingen, language: English, abstract: Management research is constantly criticized in the academic community to have very little impact on managers in practical life. This problem is highly discussed in academic circles and often referred to as the utilization problem (van Aken, 2004) or the rigor-relevance dilemma/gap (Fincham & Clark, 2009; Avenier, 2010). The problem is that the conducted management research is either scientifically verified, but not relevant for practice or practically relevant but not scientifically verified (van Aken, 2004). There are various explanations for this problem. Many researchers claim that a lack of sufficient communication presentation of management research is the root of the problem (Davies, 2007). This is in accordance with the so-called 'knowledge transfer problem'(Shapiro, Kirkman, & Courtey, 2007). Others blame the little relevance of management research for practitioners (Denyer, Tranfield, & van Aken, 2007), which is reflected in the 'knowledge production problem' (Shapiro, Kirkman, & Courtey, 2007). Furthermore, management research is claimed as 'too descriptive' (van Aken, 2004), which means that management science is only describing and analyzing but not actually providing solutions to problems. Lastly, some researchers describe management research as too fragmented in terms of research groups and knowledge products (Denyer, Tranfield, & van Aken, 2007). The researchers claim that too little cooperation between researchers restricts knowledge solutions and weakens the position of management research. In order to increase relevance of management research and to create a clear academic identity (Tranfield & van Aken, 2006) academic community calls for new research approaches, particularly the so-called design science approach (van Aken, 2004). Design science helps to actually design solutions to field problems but still keeping academic relevance in order to fulfill Pettigrew's idea of accomplishing both, academic and practical relevance (Pettigrew, 1997). This paper aims to give the reader an overview on design science and its (possible) practical relevance in management research. First of all, the author will present the ideas of design science and its main determinants of major research contributors. Afterwards, a comparison between design science and the often with design science presented action research and evidence-based management approach is made. Chapter 3 will then present two examples of executed research and applied design science.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2013 in the subject Business economics - Business Management, Corporate Governance, grade: 1,0, European School of Business Reutlingen, language: English, abstract: Management research is constantly criticized in the academic community to have very little impact on managers in practical life. This problem is highly discussed in academic circles and often referred to as the utilization problem (van Aken, 2004) or the rigor-relevance dilemma/gap (Fincham & Clark, 2009; Avenier, 2010). The problem is that the conducted management research is either scientifically verified, but not relevant for practice or practically relevant but not scientifically verified (van Aken, 2004). There are various explanations for this problem. Many researchers claim that a lack of sufficient communication presentation of management research is the root of the problem (Davies, 2007). This is in accordance with the so-called 'knowledge transfer problem'(Shapiro, Kirkman, & Courtey, 2007). Others blame the little relevance of management research for practitioners (Denyer, Tranfield, & van Aken, 2007), which is reflected in the 'knowledge production problem' (Shapiro, Kirkman, & Courtey, 2007). Furthermore, management research is claimed as 'too descriptive' (van Aken, 2004), which means that management science is only describing and analyzing but not actually providing solutions to problems. Lastly, some researchers describe management research as too fragmented in terms of research groups and knowledge products (Denyer, Tranfield, & van Aken, 2007). The researchers claim that too little cooperation between researchers restricts knowledge solutions and weakens the position of management research. In order to increase relevance of management research and to create a clear academic identity (Tranfield & van Aken, 2006) academic community calls for new research approaches, particularly the so-called design science approach (van Aken, 2004). Design science helps to actually design solutions to field problems but still keeping academic relevance in order to fulfill Pettigrew's idea of accomplishing both, academic and practical relevance (Pettigrew, 1997). This paper aims to give the reader an overview on design science and its (possible) practical relevance in management research. First of all, the author will present the ideas of design science and its main determinants of major research contributors. Afterwards, a comparison between design science and the often with design science presented action research and evidence-based management approach is made. Chapter 3 will then present two examples of executed research and applied design science.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Beobachtungen zu Ödön von Horváth 'Geschichten aus dem Wiener Wald' by Markus Karmann
Cover of the book Das Economic Value Added Konzept als Ansatz in der Unternehmensbewertung by Markus Karmann
Cover of the book Natura naturata und Natura naturans: Vergleich der Wasserlandschaften von Claude Monet und Paul Cézanne by Markus Karmann
Cover of the book Die Bedeutung des Brexit für europäische Gesellschaftsformen, insbesondere der Limited by Markus Karmann
Cover of the book Besessenheit, Geistervertreibung und Seelenwanderung im Judentum by Markus Karmann
Cover of the book Varianzen in der erfolgreichen Einflussnahme auf Inhalte der Europäischen Kommission zwischen organisierten Interessen by Markus Karmann
Cover of the book Kritische Analyse potenzieller Wettbewerbsvorteile durch Vertikalisierung im Bekleidungseinzelhandel by Markus Karmann
Cover of the book Die Rolle der bürgerlichen Frauen in Deutschland by Markus Karmann
Cover of the book Kontinuität oder Wandel? Zum Verhältnis zwischen Rechts- und Sozialstaat by Markus Karmann
Cover of the book Auswirkung von Basel II für die Kreditfinanzierung der mittelständischen Wirtschaft by Markus Karmann
Cover of the book Minderheitenrechte und Sezession - Eine theoretische Abhandlung mit Bezugnahme auf Quebec by Markus Karmann
Cover of the book Populäre Filmdramaturgie - Eine dramaturgische Analyse der Kill Bill-Filme von Quentin Tarantino by Markus Karmann
Cover of the book Content Management Systeme im Vergleich by Markus Karmann
Cover of the book Verhaltensauffälligkeiten bei gehörlosen Kindern und Jugendlichen by Markus Karmann
Cover of the book Der Drittschutzcharakter der §§ 4, 5 des Niedersächsischen Tariftreue- und Vergabegesetzes (NTVergG) by Markus Karmann
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy