The U.S.' and Israel's Securitization of Iran's Nuclear Energy

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Security
Cover of the book The U.S.' and Israel's Securitization of Iran's Nuclear Energy by Nassef M. Adiong, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Nassef M. Adiong ISBN: 9783640266197
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: February 12, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Nassef M. Adiong
ISBN: 9783640266197
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: February 12, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: A+, Technological University of the Philippines (International Studies), course: for college papers, 21 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Caveat: The title above is quite absurd due to the fact that in the traditional sense of defining security, any country aspiring for weapons of mass destruction or WMDs, which obviously nuclear used for developing weapons, is part and parcel of that nexus and is apparently a security issue; in other words it doesn't need the securitization process. It absolutely manifests the core concepts of traditional security which is akin to military, war, or what we should say high politics of hard power prior to the Cold War period. However, my conception of the above statement is merely a Western thought, though majority in the academia that specializes in international security accept that premise. One would ask if we can actually securitize a security issue. The answer is definitely no, because in the first place, it has been securitized and an extraordinary response was made to normalize the matter. The nuclear energy issue of Iran is a different case because it was foreseen as an unprecedented security matter by Israel and the United States in which Iran hasn't developed a culpable force of nuclear enrichment particularly uranium that would be used for military defence or political weapons as how the West reiterated this contention. The thin difference in securitizing Iran's nuclear energy ambition is looking at a causational link that made Iran decided to produce its own nuclear energy enrichment, which scholars have been debating on the intent and purpose of Iran. [...]

Nassef is a lifelong learner of comparative study between Islam and International Relations. He created the IR-IS Research Cohort on December 2012 that became Co-IRIS (International Relations and Islamic Studies Research Cohort) on November 2013. In addition to his service to profession, he founded the Philippine International Studies Organization (PHISO) on September 2015.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: A+, Technological University of the Philippines (International Studies), course: for college papers, 21 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Caveat: The title above is quite absurd due to the fact that in the traditional sense of defining security, any country aspiring for weapons of mass destruction or WMDs, which obviously nuclear used for developing weapons, is part and parcel of that nexus and is apparently a security issue; in other words it doesn't need the securitization process. It absolutely manifests the core concepts of traditional security which is akin to military, war, or what we should say high politics of hard power prior to the Cold War period. However, my conception of the above statement is merely a Western thought, though majority in the academia that specializes in international security accept that premise. One would ask if we can actually securitize a security issue. The answer is definitely no, because in the first place, it has been securitized and an extraordinary response was made to normalize the matter. The nuclear energy issue of Iran is a different case because it was foreseen as an unprecedented security matter by Israel and the United States in which Iran hasn't developed a culpable force of nuclear enrichment particularly uranium that would be used for military defence or political weapons as how the West reiterated this contention. The thin difference in securitizing Iran's nuclear energy ambition is looking at a causational link that made Iran decided to produce its own nuclear energy enrichment, which scholars have been debating on the intent and purpose of Iran. [...]

Nassef is a lifelong learner of comparative study between Islam and International Relations. He created the IR-IS Research Cohort on December 2012 that became Co-IRIS (International Relations and Islamic Studies Research Cohort) on November 2013. In addition to his service to profession, he founded the Philippine International Studies Organization (PHISO) on September 2015.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Moving towards a new paradigm of collaboration. The influence of current automotive trends on mobility business models and competitive advantage of traditional German OEMs by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Raise of the Midgets. Towards a European Security and Defence Policy. by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book The rise of medi moguls by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Application of a unique model to build up succession of family business in practice by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Approaching Inflection: The functional head analysis versus Word-and-Paradigm by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Humor in Comic Strips: A pragmatic Analysis of 'Nemi' by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Queer Identity and Sexual Desire by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Melville's Captain Ahab as a Literary Antitype by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book What are the differences between the academic and the political view on international terrorism? by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Sir Thomas More's 'Utopia': A discussion of its reasons and reception by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Gerontological counseling by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Metaphor or the war on words - a critical analysis of the theory of conceptual metaphors by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book CharlesTaylor - 'The Politics of Recognition' and Intercultural Tensions by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Considering the Possibility of Life on Mars by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Season's change in South Tyrol - the poem 'Herbst ist's' and the history of a region by Nassef M. Adiong
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy