The Gravitational Probe B Boondoggle

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Science, Physics, Gravity
Cover of the book The Gravitational Probe B Boondoggle by James Constant, James Constant
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: James Constant ISBN: 9781311607263
Publisher: James Constant Publication: January 27, 2015
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: James Constant
ISBN: 9781311607263
Publisher: James Constant
Publication: January 27, 2015
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

Einstein's theory, in its so called weak gravity field linearized version, approximately reduces to Newton's theory. Conflicting linearizations depend on their authors and, are heavily mathematical, involve non-physical geometrical concepts, and rely on Newtonian type tests and results. For example, Einstein's theory does not inform us how, absent force, his warped geometry might actuate Newton's gyroscope. Basically, Einstein tells us that one can ignore Newton's predictions based on Newton's force F but, nevertheless, use Newton's force F and gyroscope to prove his predictions based on weak fields approximating Newton's theory with different equations proposed by different authors. Einstein's theory, and predictions, cannot be confirmed with tests using Newton's force F, and gyroscope. And, they cannot be confirmed when equations are manipulated by their authors. Which set of Einstein's theory predictions is correct? Incredibly, the science community accepts Einstein's theory which relies on Delphic metaphysical equations linearized to approximate Newton's theory and a handful of tests based essentially on Newton's theory. There are many detractors.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Einstein's theory, in its so called weak gravity field linearized version, approximately reduces to Newton's theory. Conflicting linearizations depend on their authors and, are heavily mathematical, involve non-physical geometrical concepts, and rely on Newtonian type tests and results. For example, Einstein's theory does not inform us how, absent force, his warped geometry might actuate Newton's gyroscope. Basically, Einstein tells us that one can ignore Newton's predictions based on Newton's force F but, nevertheless, use Newton's force F and gyroscope to prove his predictions based on weak fields approximating Newton's theory with different equations proposed by different authors. Einstein's theory, and predictions, cannot be confirmed with tests using Newton's force F, and gyroscope. And, they cannot be confirmed when equations are manipulated by their authors. Which set of Einstein's theory predictions is correct? Incredibly, the science community accepts Einstein's theory which relies on Delphic metaphysical equations linearized to approximate Newton's theory and a handful of tests based essentially on Newton's theory. There are many detractors.

More books from James Constant

Cover of the book Proof of Riemann's Hypothesis by James Constant
Cover of the book The Right to Petition And Democracy by James Constant
Cover of the book Black Holes by James Constant
Cover of the book Hilbert Godel Turing and the Computer Decision Problem by James Constant
Cover of the book Globalization and American Hegemony by James Constant
Cover of the book Cosmic Expansion Slowdown Speedup and the Big Bang Theory by James Constant
Cover of the book How Courts Abuse Property Owners by James Constant
Cover of the book Nature of Government by James Constant
Cover of the book Extended Zeta Functions Prove or Dis-prove Riemann's Hypothesis by James Constant
Cover of the book Einstein's Geometry and Tests by James Constant
Cover of the book Redshift and Speed of Light by James Constant
Cover of the book Speed of Gravity by James Constant
Cover of the book Malthus Revisited by James Constant
Cover of the book Riemann's Geometry and Newton's Gravitation by James Constant
Cover of the book Petitions Denied Without Opinion: Supreme Court Cases by James Constant
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy