Hilbert Godel Turing and the Computer Decision Problem

Nonfiction, Computers, Advanced Computing, Computer Science, Programming
Cover of the book Hilbert Godel Turing and the Computer Decision Problem by James Constant, James Constant
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: James Constant ISBN: 9780463782866
Publisher: James Constant Publication: December 3, 2018
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: James Constant
ISBN: 9780463782866
Publisher: James Constant
Publication: December 3, 2018
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

Is there a procedure or algorithm that can decide whether statements, mathematical or non-mathematical, are true or false, win or draw? The broader decision problem can be stated as follows: Even though a mathematical or non-mathematical statement is undecidable in general, it may be possible to find a special algorithm that makes a computer model stop or checkmate. A computer model stops when a true or false decision is made. A computer model game ends when a checkmate win or draw occurs.
Philosophically, no procedure can decide whether statements in science, reason, and faith are true or false, win or draw. While it is theoretically possible to find exceptions to this rule, such exceptions are not possible absent confirmation and/or with less than perfect artifacts, computers and software, and less than perfect man-skills. True and false statements abound in science, less so in reason and non in faith.[10]

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Is there a procedure or algorithm that can decide whether statements, mathematical or non-mathematical, are true or false, win or draw? The broader decision problem can be stated as follows: Even though a mathematical or non-mathematical statement is undecidable in general, it may be possible to find a special algorithm that makes a computer model stop or checkmate. A computer model stops when a true or false decision is made. A computer model game ends when a checkmate win or draw occurs.
Philosophically, no procedure can decide whether statements in science, reason, and faith are true or false, win or draw. While it is theoretically possible to find exceptions to this rule, such exceptions are not possible absent confirmation and/or with less than perfect artifacts, computers and software, and less than perfect man-skills. True and false statements abound in science, less so in reason and non in faith.[10]

More books from James Constant

Cover of the book Supreme Court Petition For Rehearing No 10-1275 by James Constant
Cover of the book Population Controls by James Constant
Cover of the book Federal Courts Crush Inventors by James Constant
Cover of the book Cosmic Expansion Slowdown Speedup and the Big Bang Theory by James Constant
Cover of the book How Federal Courts Defraud Patent Owners by James Constant
Cover of the book Le Verrier's and Einstein's Predictions for Precession of Perihelia by James Constant
Cover of the book Riemann's Analytic Expression Disproved by James Constant
Cover of the book Questions Presented Supreme Court Cases by James Constant
Cover of the book Constant v American Micro-Devices (Supreme Court Patent Morass) by James Constant
Cover of the book How the Supreme Court Emasculates Patent Law by James Constant
Cover of the book Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 98-1972. by James Constant
Cover of the book Fermat's Last Theorem and Beal's Conjecture by James Constant
Cover of the book Globalization and American Hegemony by James Constant
Cover of the book Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963 by James Constant
Cover of the book Terri Shiavo: Her Life Due Process and Death by James Constant
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy