Comments on George Murphy's Article (2018) "The Nuts and Bolts of Creation"

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Religious
Cover of the book Comments on George Murphy's Article (2018) "The Nuts and Bolts of Creation" by Razie Mah, Razie Mah
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Razie Mah ISBN: 9781942824473
Publisher: Razie Mah Publication: April 7, 2018
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Razie Mah
ISBN: 9781942824473
Publisher: Razie Mah
Publication: April 7, 2018
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

For 40 years, George Murphy has been examining the sciences from the viewpoint of the Trinity. In this article, he first considers how Christians came to appreciate the Trinitarian nature of God, especially when it comes to creation. God cooperates with creatures, respecting the capacities and limitations that He Himself endowed them. Thus, there is something akin to a "causal joint" between the actions of God and His creatures.
Mimicking the scientific principle of uniformitarianism, Murphy projects this portrait of a causal joint back into the beginning. He can see it in the formation of our solar system and our planet. He can see it going back all the way to a fraction of a moment after the Big Bang. The causal joint associates to God's self-emptying or "kenosis".
These comments rely on a category-based model for the presence underlying the word "religion" (appearing in How to Define the Word "Religion"). Religion is characterized by two types of objects in the society tier. One type of object is organizational. Organizational objects define an institution and inform an organization. The other type is relational. The relational object brings all into relation. It serves as the actuality in the normal context of "assume". It is powered by the potential of consilience.
This relational object belongs to actuality. Therefore, it is dyadic, consisting in two contiguous elements. For Christians, the two elements are triadic relations. One relation is theological. The other is cosmological or anthropological. The contiguity between these two relations consists in the dual natures of Christ.
Seventy years ago, Eric Voegelin described the Christian relational object as the most differentiated in human history. He concluded that all other relational objects must be compared to this.
Murphy's investigations are interesting and stand alone. But, in as much as they discuss the Trinity and science, they are open to models based on the philosophy of Charles Peirce. Peirce re-discovered triadic relations. What a productive revelation it has turned out to be.
Attend to a Trinitarian understanding of God. The rest will follow.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

For 40 years, George Murphy has been examining the sciences from the viewpoint of the Trinity. In this article, he first considers how Christians came to appreciate the Trinitarian nature of God, especially when it comes to creation. God cooperates with creatures, respecting the capacities and limitations that He Himself endowed them. Thus, there is something akin to a "causal joint" between the actions of God and His creatures.
Mimicking the scientific principle of uniformitarianism, Murphy projects this portrait of a causal joint back into the beginning. He can see it in the formation of our solar system and our planet. He can see it going back all the way to a fraction of a moment after the Big Bang. The causal joint associates to God's self-emptying or "kenosis".
These comments rely on a category-based model for the presence underlying the word "religion" (appearing in How to Define the Word "Religion"). Religion is characterized by two types of objects in the society tier. One type of object is organizational. Organizational objects define an institution and inform an organization. The other type is relational. The relational object brings all into relation. It serves as the actuality in the normal context of "assume". It is powered by the potential of consilience.
This relational object belongs to actuality. Therefore, it is dyadic, consisting in two contiguous elements. For Christians, the two elements are triadic relations. One relation is theological. The other is cosmological or anthropological. The contiguity between these two relations consists in the dual natures of Christ.
Seventy years ago, Eric Voegelin described the Christian relational object as the most differentiated in human history. He concluded that all other relational objects must be compared to this.
Murphy's investigations are interesting and stand alone. But, in as much as they discuss the Trinity and science, they are open to models based on the philosophy of Charles Peirce. Peirce re-discovered triadic relations. What a productive revelation it has turned out to be.
Attend to a Trinitarian understanding of God. The rest will follow.

More books from Razie Mah

Cover of the book Comments on Thomas Hobbes Book (1651) The Leviathan Part 2 by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Joseph Carroll’s Chapter (2018) "Evolutionary Literary Theory" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer on Another Infrasovereign Religion by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Religious Experience (1985) by Wayne Proudfoot by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on James Madden’s Essay (2017) A Thomistic Theory of Intentionality by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer on the Family by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on “A Bio-Cultural-Historical Approach to the Study of Development (2016)” by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Zuckerman, Li and Diener's Article (2018) "Religion as an Exchange System" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Tyler Paytas' Essay (2019) "Divine Hiddenness as Kantian Theodicy" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Matthew Minerd’s Essay (2019) "Thomism and the Formal Object of Logic" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Joshua Lee Harris’s Essay (2017) Analogy in Aquinas by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on James V. Schall S.J.’s (2017) Political Philosophy and Catholicism by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer for Individual In Community by Razie Mah
Cover of the book The Inevitable Twist: Comments on Lamoureux’s Question by Razie Mah
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy