Comments on Eric Santner’s Book (2016) The Weight of All Flesh

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Political, Reference & Language, Education & Teaching
Cover of the book Comments on Eric Santner’s Book (2016) The Weight of All Flesh by Razie Mah, Razie Mah
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Razie Mah ISBN: 9781942824268
Publisher: Razie Mah Publication: November 17, 2016
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Razie Mah
ISBN: 9781942824268
Publisher: Razie Mah
Publication: November 17, 2016
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

In The Weight of All Flesh: On the Subject-Matter of Political Economy (2016), professor Eric Santner presents an idea: Late medieval and early modern political theology transubstantiated into middle and late modern political economy.
He does this through directed association, drawing on references that - at first - do not seem linked, then pulling them into an image of an abstract materiality shifting from the glorious body of the medieval king to the everyday regular citizen of the modern world.
His argument sounds like a dream, demanding psychoanalytic interpretation.
My interpretation uses the category-based nested form. This form permits different levels of complexity, ideal for examining Santner’s multilayered and intuitive presentation. The forms visually demonstrate that modern materialism is relational in nature.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In The Weight of All Flesh: On the Subject-Matter of Political Economy (2016), professor Eric Santner presents an idea: Late medieval and early modern political theology transubstantiated into middle and late modern political economy.
He does this through directed association, drawing on references that - at first - do not seem linked, then pulling them into an image of an abstract materiality shifting from the glorious body of the medieval king to the everyday regular citizen of the modern world.
His argument sounds like a dream, demanding psychoanalytic interpretation.
My interpretation uses the category-based nested form. This form permits different levels of complexity, ideal for examining Santner’s multilayered and intuitive presentation. The forms visually demonstrate that modern materialism is relational in nature.

More books from Razie Mah

Cover of the book Comments on Sasha Newell's Article (2018) "The Affectiveness of Symbols" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer on Natural Signs by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Steven Mithen's Book (1996) The Prehistory of The Mind by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Andrew Hollingsworth’s Paper (2016) Ecos of Meaning by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Mariusz Tabaczek’s Essay (2019) "What do God and Creatures Really Do in an Evolutionary Change?" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Thomas Hobbes Book (1651) The Leviathan Part 2 by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Daniel Novotny’s Essay (2017) Izquierdo on Universals by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Derek Bickerton's Book (2014) More than Nature Needs by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Joseph Carroll’s Chapter (2018) "Evolutionary Literary Theory" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer for the Category-Based Nested Form by Razie Mah
Cover of the book An Archaeology of the Fall by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Thomas Hobbes Book (1651) The Leviathan Part 3 by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Egil Asprem and Ann Taves’s Essay (2018) "Explanation and the Study of Religion" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Lessons 25-36 for Instructor’s Guide to An Archaeology of the Fall and Related Scriptures by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Stephen Greenblatt’s Book (2017) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve by Razie Mah
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy