Are authoritarian states more able to resort to the use of violence than democracies to fulfill their foreign policy aims?

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Security
Cover of the book Are authoritarian states more able to resort to the use of violence than democracies to fulfill their foreign policy aims? by Peter Tilman Schuessler, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Peter Tilman Schuessler ISBN: 9783638157483
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: December 3, 2002
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Peter Tilman Schuessler
ISBN: 9783638157483
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: December 3, 2002
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Essay from the year 2002 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: 17 von 20 (A), University of St Andrews (Department of IR), course: IR 1006, 23 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: To begin it is necessary to clarify the title of this essay. As the question treats foreign policy aims, violence in this context is to be seen as the use of coercive means outside the own state's territory. This essay will furthermore not differentiate between the different authoritarian states and hence will include all non-democracies in this context. It will be therefore deal only with the capability and not with the probability of states to use violence. The democratic structure and culture in general makes it harder for the elected governments to act violently but this paper will illustrate that dictatorships will also face some constraints. It will be shown in particular that it is more difficult for democracies to initiate aggressive military operations openly than for authoritarian states, but that there are few differences in the ability to respond to provocations or hostile actions. There are even less distinctions between both kinds of rule in certain 'types of violence' like the deployment of covert actions To demonstrate those contrarieties and similarities this text will deal firstly with implications of structure, public opinion, alliances, economy, etc. on the visible use of force and secondly compare the systems in regard to hidden operations. Hence there are so many different kinds of states that it is not possible to find suitable abstract descriptions of their capabilities. This essay will try to clarify the argument with some examples, well aware that they do not fit for all democratic and all authoritarian states.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay from the year 2002 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: 17 von 20 (A), University of St Andrews (Department of IR), course: IR 1006, 23 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: To begin it is necessary to clarify the title of this essay. As the question treats foreign policy aims, violence in this context is to be seen as the use of coercive means outside the own state's territory. This essay will furthermore not differentiate between the different authoritarian states and hence will include all non-democracies in this context. It will be therefore deal only with the capability and not with the probability of states to use violence. The democratic structure and culture in general makes it harder for the elected governments to act violently but this paper will illustrate that dictatorships will also face some constraints. It will be shown in particular that it is more difficult for democracies to initiate aggressive military operations openly than for authoritarian states, but that there are few differences in the ability to respond to provocations or hostile actions. There are even less distinctions between both kinds of rule in certain 'types of violence' like the deployment of covert actions To demonstrate those contrarieties and similarities this text will deal firstly with implications of structure, public opinion, alliances, economy, etc. on the visible use of force and secondly compare the systems in regard to hidden operations. Hence there are so many different kinds of states that it is not possible to find suitable abstract descriptions of their capabilities. This essay will try to clarify the argument with some examples, well aware that they do not fit for all democratic and all authoritarian states.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book I am my supervisor's slave by Peter Tilman Schuessler
Cover of the book In what ways did Deng Xiaoping's chosen developmental path for China differ from Mao Zedong's? by Peter Tilman Schuessler
Cover of the book The Trend towards Corporate Voluntary Disclosures by Peter Tilman Schuessler
Cover of the book Relations between the Republic of China (Taiwan) and the Republic of Paraguay by Peter Tilman Schuessler
Cover of the book Inner Culture - Inter Culture - Outer Culture by Peter Tilman Schuessler
Cover of the book The Myth of Alfred Hitchcock by Peter Tilman Schuessler
Cover of the book The Origins of Chinese Social Revolutions by Peter Tilman Schuessler
Cover of the book The state question of religion by Peter Tilman Schuessler
Cover of the book Das skandinavische Arbeitsmarktmodell: Übertragbar auf Deutschland? by Peter Tilman Schuessler
Cover of the book Standard Costing, Variance Analysis and Decision-Making by Peter Tilman Schuessler
Cover of the book The Formation of European Economic Community in the context of International Political Economy Theory by Peter Tilman Schuessler
Cover of the book Love Me or Kill Me by Peter Tilman Schuessler
Cover of the book Ownership Structure as a Determinant of Capital Structure - An Empirical Study of DAX Companies by Peter Tilman Schuessler
Cover of the book Die Theorie von Robinsohn (Curriculumtheorie) - Umsetzung des lernzielorientierten Ansatzes am Unterrichtsthema: 'Einführung in die individuelle Nachfrage' by Peter Tilman Schuessler
Cover of the book Speisung der Viertausend (Mt 15,32-39). Eine semiotische Analyse by Peter Tilman Schuessler
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy