Williams Syndrome in Psycholinguistics

A single developmental disorder as evidence for the modularity of the language faculty?

Nonfiction, Entertainment, Drama, Anthologies
Cover of the book Williams Syndrome in Psycholinguistics by Marcel Brauhardt, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Marcel Brauhardt ISBN: 9783640641345
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: June 14, 2010
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Marcel Brauhardt
ISBN: 9783640641345
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: June 14, 2010
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2010 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,7, Humboldt-University of Berlin (Anglistik/ Amerikanistik), course: Syntactic Competence, Structures and Processes, language: English, abstract: Background: In their study, Clahsen and Almazan (2001) tried to show that the analysis of Williams syndrome from a linguistic perspective might lead to evidence for the modular structure of the human language faculty, a widespread assumption yet, but without accepted evidence. Karmiloff-Smith amongst others, argues by contrast that disorders, such as Williams syndrome, are too complex to allow such general deduction as presented by Clahsen and Almazan. Method: First, the study by Clahsen and Almazan is going to be introduced. Then, more recent and challenging argumentation from different sources will be discussed in terms of plausibility of the conclusion drawn by the authors of the study. Result: The explanation offered by Clahsen and Almazan is clearly nondevelopmental and therefore discounts vital aspects of language acquisition, especially for people with disorders. Thus, their core argument turns out to be hardly tenable. Conclusion: Evaluation of the contrasting argumentation shows that neither Williams syndrome nor other disorders such as Specific language impairment alone can serve as ultimate proof for modularity of the human language faculty. Disorders rather point to crucial developmental delays and disadvantages in the process of language acquisition and therefore cannot be evidence for the dual structure of the language faculty. Even within single domains, fractionation occurs at such a complex level that any explanation must consider the aspect of development.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2010 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,7, Humboldt-University of Berlin (Anglistik/ Amerikanistik), course: Syntactic Competence, Structures and Processes, language: English, abstract: Background: In their study, Clahsen and Almazan (2001) tried to show that the analysis of Williams syndrome from a linguistic perspective might lead to evidence for the modular structure of the human language faculty, a widespread assumption yet, but without accepted evidence. Karmiloff-Smith amongst others, argues by contrast that disorders, such as Williams syndrome, are too complex to allow such general deduction as presented by Clahsen and Almazan. Method: First, the study by Clahsen and Almazan is going to be introduced. Then, more recent and challenging argumentation from different sources will be discussed in terms of plausibility of the conclusion drawn by the authors of the study. Result: The explanation offered by Clahsen and Almazan is clearly nondevelopmental and therefore discounts vital aspects of language acquisition, especially for people with disorders. Thus, their core argument turns out to be hardly tenable. Conclusion: Evaluation of the contrasting argumentation shows that neither Williams syndrome nor other disorders such as Specific language impairment alone can serve as ultimate proof for modularity of the human language faculty. Disorders rather point to crucial developmental delays and disadvantages in the process of language acquisition and therefore cannot be evidence for the dual structure of the language faculty. Even within single domains, fractionation occurs at such a complex level that any explanation must consider the aspect of development.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Ältere Menschen und Computerspiele by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Erziehungsratgeber im Zeitalter der Aufklärung und der Postmoderne - ein konkreter Vergleich anhand zweier ausgewählter Beispiele by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Die Anwendung der Balanced Scorecard im Informationsmanagement by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Möglichkeiten einer transdisziplinaren Arbeit zwischen Geistes- und Naturwissenschaften in der Geschlechterforschung by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Sitcom And 'German-Bashing' by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Der Dom zu Magdeburg - Die Baugeschichte der gotischen Kathedrale anhand des Bauwerks by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Rollenverteilung und Machtgefüge in der bürgerlichen Familie um 1900 by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Risikobiographien - Lebensentwürfe junger Erwachsener in erschwerten Lebenslagen by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Anwendung des Ansatzes der Evidence Based Medicine im Bereich der Behindertenhilfe by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Rollentheoretische Aspekte in der Sozialisationstheorie by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book How Budget Airlines in India leverage on Online Marketing to increase the Competitiveness by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Anleitung zum selbständigen Telefonieren einer ausgebildeten Telefonistin nach Neueinstellung (Unterweisung im Krankenhaus) by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Interdisziplinäre Projekte im Informatikunterricht by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Die Emotionstheorie von Charles Darwin by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book The prevalence of, and motivation for, mass building supplement use among teenage males by Marcel Brauhardt
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy