Williams Syndrome in Psycholinguistics

A single developmental disorder as evidence for the modularity of the language faculty?

Nonfiction, Entertainment, Drama, Anthologies
Cover of the book Williams Syndrome in Psycholinguistics by Marcel Brauhardt, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Marcel Brauhardt ISBN: 9783640641345
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: June 14, 2010
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Marcel Brauhardt
ISBN: 9783640641345
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: June 14, 2010
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2010 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,7, Humboldt-University of Berlin (Anglistik/ Amerikanistik), course: Syntactic Competence, Structures and Processes, language: English, abstract: Background: In their study, Clahsen and Almazan (2001) tried to show that the analysis of Williams syndrome from a linguistic perspective might lead to evidence for the modular structure of the human language faculty, a widespread assumption yet, but without accepted evidence. Karmiloff-Smith amongst others, argues by contrast that disorders, such as Williams syndrome, are too complex to allow such general deduction as presented by Clahsen and Almazan. Method: First, the study by Clahsen and Almazan is going to be introduced. Then, more recent and challenging argumentation from different sources will be discussed in terms of plausibility of the conclusion drawn by the authors of the study. Result: The explanation offered by Clahsen and Almazan is clearly nondevelopmental and therefore discounts vital aspects of language acquisition, especially for people with disorders. Thus, their core argument turns out to be hardly tenable. Conclusion: Evaluation of the contrasting argumentation shows that neither Williams syndrome nor other disorders such as Specific language impairment alone can serve as ultimate proof for modularity of the human language faculty. Disorders rather point to crucial developmental delays and disadvantages in the process of language acquisition and therefore cannot be evidence for the dual structure of the language faculty. Even within single domains, fractionation occurs at such a complex level that any explanation must consider the aspect of development.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2010 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,7, Humboldt-University of Berlin (Anglistik/ Amerikanistik), course: Syntactic Competence, Structures and Processes, language: English, abstract: Background: In their study, Clahsen and Almazan (2001) tried to show that the analysis of Williams syndrome from a linguistic perspective might lead to evidence for the modular structure of the human language faculty, a widespread assumption yet, but without accepted evidence. Karmiloff-Smith amongst others, argues by contrast that disorders, such as Williams syndrome, are too complex to allow such general deduction as presented by Clahsen and Almazan. Method: First, the study by Clahsen and Almazan is going to be introduced. Then, more recent and challenging argumentation from different sources will be discussed in terms of plausibility of the conclusion drawn by the authors of the study. Result: The explanation offered by Clahsen and Almazan is clearly nondevelopmental and therefore discounts vital aspects of language acquisition, especially for people with disorders. Thus, their core argument turns out to be hardly tenable. Conclusion: Evaluation of the contrasting argumentation shows that neither Williams syndrome nor other disorders such as Specific language impairment alone can serve as ultimate proof for modularity of the human language faculty. Disorders rather point to crucial developmental delays and disadvantages in the process of language acquisition and therefore cannot be evidence for the dual structure of the language faculty. Even within single domains, fractionation occurs at such a complex level that any explanation must consider the aspect of development.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Erklären und Verstehen in den Sozialwissenschaften by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Eine Kursstunde zum Thema Wirbelsäulengymnastik im Gruppentraining by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Überschussrenditen durch Stock Picking by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Freiraumplanerisches Entwicklungskonzept in Oberhof (Südthüringen) - Plattenbau spezialisierend by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Expertenstandards in der Pflegepraxis. Tipps, Hindernisse und Wege für die Implementierung by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Das Sportgymnasium. Eine spezielle Schulform by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Hierarchie und Mobilität - ein interdisziplinärer Vergleich mit Schwerpunkt auf der griechischen Antike by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Are there similarities in first and second language acquisition? by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Genocide Studies - Analyse the question of resposibility by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Richterliche Unabhängigkeit und Einheit der Rechtsprechung by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Kernpraktikum Katholische Theologie an einer Gesamtschule by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Cloud-Computing: Vom Hype zur Realität? by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Qualitätsmanagement im Vertrieb by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Zwangsstörungen. Diagnostik und Intervention by Marcel Brauhardt
Cover of the book Japanese Cultural Concepts and Business Practices as a Basis for Management and Commerce Recommendations by Marcel Brauhardt
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy