The European Union and the World Trade Organisation - Two governance systems in trade policy: A selection of their differences, similarities and mutual influences

Two governance systems in trade policy: A selection of their differences, similarities and mutual influences

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book The European Union and the World Trade Organisation - Two governance systems in trade policy: A selection of their differences, similarities and mutual influences by Joanna Mastalerek, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Joanna Mastalerek ISBN: 9783638268752
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: April 16, 2004
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Joanna Mastalerek
ISBN: 9783638268752
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: April 16, 2004
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2004 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 1,0 (A), Hamburg University of Ecomomy and Policy (Political Science), course: Globalisation and European Governance, language: English, abstract: In general terms, both the European Union (EU) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) can be described as governance systems: 'Governance is about the structured ways and means in which the divergent preferences of interdependent actors are translated into policy choices to allocate values, so that the plurality of interests is transformed into co-ordinated action and the compliance of actors is achieved.'1 This essay cannot reflect all aspects of the two governance systems, but is limited to a selection of their differences, similarities and mutual influences. After the opening remark alludes to a similarity, the differences will be touched upon next. The individual characteristics of the EU and the WTO become particularly obvious in the institutional set-ups of the two organisations: In the case of the EU one deals with a supranational organisation, what means that the current 15 member states partly transfer sovereign rights to the organisation, thus rendering the EU a partly independent and powerful policy actor. In comparison, the WTO is an intergovernmental organisation, in which its 146 members negotiate without transferring any sovereignity to the organisation, thus depriving the WTO of any independence in policy decisions 2. The WTO is a broad international organisation, its members accounting for over 90 % of all trade in the world, whereas the EU, being a member of the WTO, is a geographically limited and closely integrated organisation. Even though the EU represents just 6 % of the world's population, it accounts for more than a fifth of global imports and exports3. Concerning the relationship between the two organisations, their origins had an important influence: The WTO was founded in 1995 as a successor of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) from 1947. [...] 1 Beate Kohler-Koch/ Rainer Eising (eds.): The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. London, New York: Routledge, 1999, p. 5. 2 Mary Farrell (ed.): EU and WTO regulatory frameworks. Complementarity or competition? London: Kogan Page, 1999, p. 44. 3 European Union: Making globalisation work for everyone.The European Union and world trade. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2003, p. 4.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2004 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 1,0 (A), Hamburg University of Ecomomy and Policy (Political Science), course: Globalisation and European Governance, language: English, abstract: In general terms, both the European Union (EU) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) can be described as governance systems: 'Governance is about the structured ways and means in which the divergent preferences of interdependent actors are translated into policy choices to allocate values, so that the plurality of interests is transformed into co-ordinated action and the compliance of actors is achieved.'1 This essay cannot reflect all aspects of the two governance systems, but is limited to a selection of their differences, similarities and mutual influences. After the opening remark alludes to a similarity, the differences will be touched upon next. The individual characteristics of the EU and the WTO become particularly obvious in the institutional set-ups of the two organisations: In the case of the EU one deals with a supranational organisation, what means that the current 15 member states partly transfer sovereign rights to the organisation, thus rendering the EU a partly independent and powerful policy actor. In comparison, the WTO is an intergovernmental organisation, in which its 146 members negotiate without transferring any sovereignity to the organisation, thus depriving the WTO of any independence in policy decisions 2. The WTO is a broad international organisation, its members accounting for over 90 % of all trade in the world, whereas the EU, being a member of the WTO, is a geographically limited and closely integrated organisation. Even though the EU represents just 6 % of the world's population, it accounts for more than a fifth of global imports and exports3. Concerning the relationship between the two organisations, their origins had an important influence: The WTO was founded in 1995 as a successor of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) from 1947. [...] 1 Beate Kohler-Koch/ Rainer Eising (eds.): The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. London, New York: Routledge, 1999, p. 5. 2 Mary Farrell (ed.): EU and WTO regulatory frameworks. Complementarity or competition? London: Kogan Page, 1999, p. 44. 3 European Union: Making globalisation work for everyone.The European Union and world trade. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2003, p. 4.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book An analysis of Unilever's legal form, financial performance and business strategy by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book European financial regulation and supervision and the onslaught of the financial crisis by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Compulsory Domesticity? - Comparing gender notions of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and John Stuart Mill in 'Émile' and 'The Subjection of Women' by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book The Protection of Minority Shareholders under the new Company Law of the People's Republic of China by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Is English Really a Tool of Integration? by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Tolerance of Non-Smokers to Smokers by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Germany vs. US - Two Welfare Regimes seen from the Gender perspective by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book The history of Spitalfields by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Basil Markesinis: Leading the way to a 'new ius europaeum' - A review and appraisal of the Europeanization of Private Law by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Political Parties in the USA - Realignment by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Japanese American Positionality in Hawaii and on the mainland by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Synergism between online branding and promotion of tourism destination: review in the context of destination management organizations (DMOs) by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Swap and other structured products: Critical review of recent development as tool in financial risk management applications by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Which political forces are responsible for retrenchment in social services in social democratic welfare states? by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book The Financial Crisis in Russia 1998 by Joanna Mastalerek
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy