Syntax or Pragmatics: A Comparison of different Approaches towards English Children's Delay of Principle B

Nonfiction, Entertainment, Drama, Anthologies
Cover of the book Syntax or Pragmatics: A Comparison of different Approaches towards English Children's Delay of Principle B by Michael Treichler, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Michael Treichler ISBN: 9783638325424
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: November 16, 2004
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Michael Treichler
ISBN: 9783638325424
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: November 16, 2004
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2004 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1 (A), Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg (Seminar for Anglistics), course: Hauptseminar 'Binding Theory', 7 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: In their experiment carried out in order to test children's knowledge of the binding principles, Chien and Wexler (1990) observed that their subjects showed a considerable delay of the acquisition of Principle B compared with Principle A. While the children who participated in their study mastered the locality conditions of anaphors nearly perfectly by the age of six and even earlier, many of them still allowed pronouns to be coindexed with a local antecedent. In a similar study especially designed to examine children's knowledge of only Principles B and C, Grimshaw and Rosen (1990) also found that the non-locality constraint for pronouns was to a large extent violated. Like Chien and Wexler, Grimshaw and Rosen state that children yet have innate knowledge of Principle B. A distinction has to be made, they argue, between knowledge of Principle B, on the one hand, and obedience to it on the other. Although children know Principle B, other grammatical and pragmatic influences and circumstances prevent them from obeying it. Both theses have in common that they are based on the assumption that the delay of Principle B is a universal phenomenon that can be found throughout all languages. However, in a study carried out by McKee (1992), it turned out that the delay of Principle B only affected the group of English children while the Italian children showed nearly perfect mastery of both Principle A and B. McKee accompanies these results by her proposal for an explanation of English children's delay of Principle B. Since the experiment was carried out with Italian sentences containing clitic pronouns, her account is based on syntactical differences between this type of sentences and its English counterparts containing full pronouns. This paper will start with a presentation of McKee's thesis. The presentation will be followed by a discussion in which McKee's account will be compared with alternative explanations for the delay of Principle B. Since McKee's syntactically motivated model stand in contrast to other theses based on pragmatics, the final aim will be a judgment about the adequacy and plausibility of both types of approaches. This judgment will be supported by another thesis developed by Cardinaletti and Starke (1995) in which they seek to explain the delay of Principle B by an ambiguity of English pronouns comprising all parts of grammar.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2004 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1 (A), Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg (Seminar for Anglistics), course: Hauptseminar 'Binding Theory', 7 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: In their experiment carried out in order to test children's knowledge of the binding principles, Chien and Wexler (1990) observed that their subjects showed a considerable delay of the acquisition of Principle B compared with Principle A. While the children who participated in their study mastered the locality conditions of anaphors nearly perfectly by the age of six and even earlier, many of them still allowed pronouns to be coindexed with a local antecedent. In a similar study especially designed to examine children's knowledge of only Principles B and C, Grimshaw and Rosen (1990) also found that the non-locality constraint for pronouns was to a large extent violated. Like Chien and Wexler, Grimshaw and Rosen state that children yet have innate knowledge of Principle B. A distinction has to be made, they argue, between knowledge of Principle B, on the one hand, and obedience to it on the other. Although children know Principle B, other grammatical and pragmatic influences and circumstances prevent them from obeying it. Both theses have in common that they are based on the assumption that the delay of Principle B is a universal phenomenon that can be found throughout all languages. However, in a study carried out by McKee (1992), it turned out that the delay of Principle B only affected the group of English children while the Italian children showed nearly perfect mastery of both Principle A and B. McKee accompanies these results by her proposal for an explanation of English children's delay of Principle B. Since the experiment was carried out with Italian sentences containing clitic pronouns, her account is based on syntactical differences between this type of sentences and its English counterparts containing full pronouns. This paper will start with a presentation of McKee's thesis. The presentation will be followed by a discussion in which McKee's account will be compared with alternative explanations for the delay of Principle B. Since McKee's syntactically motivated model stand in contrast to other theses based on pragmatics, the final aim will be a judgment about the adequacy and plausibility of both types of approaches. This judgment will be supported by another thesis developed by Cardinaletti and Starke (1995) in which they seek to explain the delay of Principle B by an ambiguity of English pronouns comprising all parts of grammar.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Finance-Growth Nexus: Evidence from Indian Economy using Causality Co-Integration Test based on Error Correction Model by Michael Treichler
Cover of the book Emotions in negotiations by Michael Treichler
Cover of the book Governance and Development by Michael Treichler
Cover of the book Bildungswissenschaftler im Bereich der Interkulturellen Arbeit mit Migranten. Zum 4 CID-Modell by Michael Treichler
Cover of the book Link between trade liberalisation and economic growth by Michael Treichler
Cover of the book Success Factors of Brand Extension in International Marketing by Michael Treichler
Cover of the book T.S. Eliot, W.B. Yeats and D.H. Lawrence: How Love is combined with a sense of Frustration and Fear by Michael Treichler
Cover of the book Iraqi-Kurdistan. Does the Kurdistan Regional Government have a Foreign Policy? by Michael Treichler
Cover of the book Comparative Perspectives on Imperialism and Empire in Late Imperial Russia by Michael Treichler
Cover of the book Mitarbeiterintegration: Verfahren und Ziele by Michael Treichler
Cover of the book The Functional Actor in the Securitization Process by Michael Treichler
Cover of the book Scandinavian influences in the Alliterative Morte Arthure by Michael Treichler
Cover of the book A Critical Assessment of International Post-Conflict Reconstruction Efforts in Afghanistan by Michael Treichler
Cover of the book Business process outsourcing (BPO) strategy. A conceptual approach by Michael Treichler
Cover of the book Evaluation of the Fraunhofer Open Source IMS Core platform with special focus on the Call Session Control Function (CSCF) by Michael Treichler
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy