Shakespeares Tragedies Reviewed

A Spectators Role

Fiction & Literature, Literary Theory & Criticism, British, Drama, Nonfiction, Entertainment
Cover of the book Shakespeares Tragedies Reviewed by Hugh M. Richmond, Peter Lang
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Hugh M. Richmond ISBN: 9781454191896
Publisher: Peter Lang Publication: August 28, 2015
Imprint: Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers Language: English
Author: Hugh M. Richmond
ISBN: 9781454191896
Publisher: Peter Lang
Publication: August 28, 2015
Imprint: Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers
Language: English

Shakespeare’s Tragedies Reviewed explores how the recognition of spectator interests by the playwright has determined the detailed character of Shakespeare tragedies. Utilizing Shakespeare’s European models and contemporaries, including Cinthio and Lope de Vega, and following forms such as Aristotle’s second, more popular style of tragedy (a double ending of punishment for the evil and honor for the good), Hugh Macrae Richmond elicits radical revision of traditional interpretations of the scripts. The analysis includes a major shift in emphasis from conventionally tragic concerns to a more varied blend of tones, characterizations, and situations, designed to hold spectator interest rather than to meet neoclassical standards of coherence, focus, and progression. This reinterpretation also bears on modern staging and directorial emphasis, challenging the relevance of traditional norms of tragedy to production of Renaissance drama. The stress shifts to plays’ counter-movements to tragic tones, and to scripts’ contrasting positive factors to common downbeat interpretations – such as the role of humor in King Lear and the significance of residual leadership in the tragedies as seen in the roles of Malcolm, Edgar, Cassio, and Octavius, as well as the broader progressions in such continuities as those within Shakespeare’s Roman world from Julius Caesar and Antony and Cleopatra to Cymbeline. It becomes apparent that the authority of the spectator in such Shakespearean titles as What You Will and As You Like It may bear meaningfully on interpretation of more plays than just the comedies.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Shakespeare’s Tragedies Reviewed explores how the recognition of spectator interests by the playwright has determined the detailed character of Shakespeare tragedies. Utilizing Shakespeare’s European models and contemporaries, including Cinthio and Lope de Vega, and following forms such as Aristotle’s second, more popular style of tragedy (a double ending of punishment for the evil and honor for the good), Hugh Macrae Richmond elicits radical revision of traditional interpretations of the scripts. The analysis includes a major shift in emphasis from conventionally tragic concerns to a more varied blend of tones, characterizations, and situations, designed to hold spectator interest rather than to meet neoclassical standards of coherence, focus, and progression. This reinterpretation also bears on modern staging and directorial emphasis, challenging the relevance of traditional norms of tragedy to production of Renaissance drama. The stress shifts to plays’ counter-movements to tragic tones, and to scripts’ contrasting positive factors to common downbeat interpretations – such as the role of humor in King Lear and the significance of residual leadership in the tragedies as seen in the roles of Malcolm, Edgar, Cassio, and Octavius, as well as the broader progressions in such continuities as those within Shakespeare’s Roman world from Julius Caesar and Antony and Cleopatra to Cymbeline. It becomes apparent that the authority of the spectator in such Shakespearean titles as What You Will and As You Like It may bear meaningfully on interpretation of more plays than just the comedies.

More books from Peter Lang

Cover of the book Stations en tension by Hugh M. Richmond
Cover of the book Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit und Sozialgerichtsbarkeit: Konvergenz oder notwendige Eigenstaendigkeit? by Hugh M. Richmond
Cover of the book Die Rezeption der Schoepfungserzaehlung nach Gen 1-2,4a bei Grundschuelern by Hugh M. Richmond
Cover of the book The Challenges of Policy Transfer in Vocational Skills Development by Hugh M. Richmond
Cover of the book Morgen-Glantz 26/2016 by Hugh M. Richmond
Cover of the book Constructionist Experiential Learner-Enhanced Teaching in English for Academic Purposes by Hugh M. Richmond
Cover of the book Patterns of Patronage in Renaissance Rome by Hugh M. Richmond
Cover of the book Pluricentric Languages and Non-Dominant Varieties Worldwide by Hugh M. Richmond
Cover of the book Meinungsmacht in einer konvergenten Medienwelt by Hugh M. Richmond
Cover of the book Kolonialismus und Dekolonisation in nationalen Geschichtskulturen und Erinnerungspolitiken in Europa by Hugh M. Richmond
Cover of the book Translation and Meaning. New Series, Vol. 2, Pt. 1 by Hugh M. Richmond
Cover of the book The Ordinary and the Short Story by Hugh M. Richmond
Cover of the book Amerikanische Herausforderungen by Hugh M. Richmond
Cover of the book When Cultural Policies Change by Hugh M. Richmond
Cover of the book Die Dienstleistungsbetriebsstaette im Abkommensrecht by Hugh M. Richmond
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy