How useful is teamwork as a method of doing work?

Business & Finance, Management & Leadership, Management
Cover of the book How useful is teamwork as a method of doing work? by Jonas Augustin, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Jonas Augustin ISBN: 9783640945399
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: June 28, 2011
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Jonas Augustin
ISBN: 9783640945399
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: June 28, 2011
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Essay from the year 2007 in the subject Business economics - Business Management, Corporate Governance, grade: 2,0, Lancaster University, language: English, abstract: decisions can be biased by the ambition of forming a consistent team, which blocks the team members' ability to think rationally. Further disadvantages mentioned by Boddy (2005) are the idea that teams could become too independent from their organisation by developing their own dynamics and the fact that teamwork takes too much time since decisions are mainly made by time consuming discussions However, the actual use of teamwork as a method of doing work is not merely a question about the advantages and disadvantages of teamwork. In fact, it should be examined in two different dimensions - the effectiveness and the efficiency of teamwork. The initial question should therefore be divided into two parts: is teamwork effective in a way that the team achieves the goals that were set? And how many resources have to be spent to achieve these goals? The first question has already been answered. Teams are highly effective. All team members bring in different values, skills and experiences. The results of teams are therefore based on a much broader background compared to those of working groups, which essentially means that team results are more effective. There may be situations where working groups deliver results of almost the same quality but those are rare. Boddy (2005) mentions, in this context, small technical problems, that could be resolved by independently working people. Katzenbach and Smith (1993a) believe that teams outperform working groups especially when the task requires both multiple skills and experience. The second question is not as easy to answer. The literature on teamwork has deeply analysed the notion of effectiveness of teams. But the question about their efficiency has found little attention. In order to assess the efficiency of teamwork I want to have a more detailed look on the problems arising from it. At this point, I need to point out that all the assertions about the advantages of teamwork and its effectiveness are based on the assumptions that the team members work perfectly or at least well together, i.e. that they are implemented correctly. Non-functioning teams can cause serious damage to both the team members and the organisation they belong to. Therefore, it is absolutely vital that the problems that can arise from teamwork are solved promptly. A problem that no one takes care of can delete all benefits of teamwork.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay from the year 2007 in the subject Business economics - Business Management, Corporate Governance, grade: 2,0, Lancaster University, language: English, abstract: decisions can be biased by the ambition of forming a consistent team, which blocks the team members' ability to think rationally. Further disadvantages mentioned by Boddy (2005) are the idea that teams could become too independent from their organisation by developing their own dynamics and the fact that teamwork takes too much time since decisions are mainly made by time consuming discussions However, the actual use of teamwork as a method of doing work is not merely a question about the advantages and disadvantages of teamwork. In fact, it should be examined in two different dimensions - the effectiveness and the efficiency of teamwork. The initial question should therefore be divided into two parts: is teamwork effective in a way that the team achieves the goals that were set? And how many resources have to be spent to achieve these goals? The first question has already been answered. Teams are highly effective. All team members bring in different values, skills and experiences. The results of teams are therefore based on a much broader background compared to those of working groups, which essentially means that team results are more effective. There may be situations where working groups deliver results of almost the same quality but those are rare. Boddy (2005) mentions, in this context, small technical problems, that could be resolved by independently working people. Katzenbach and Smith (1993a) believe that teams outperform working groups especially when the task requires both multiple skills and experience. The second question is not as easy to answer. The literature on teamwork has deeply analysed the notion of effectiveness of teams. But the question about their efficiency has found little attention. In order to assess the efficiency of teamwork I want to have a more detailed look on the problems arising from it. At this point, I need to point out that all the assertions about the advantages of teamwork and its effectiveness are based on the assumptions that the team members work perfectly or at least well together, i.e. that they are implemented correctly. Non-functioning teams can cause serious damage to both the team members and the organisation they belong to. Therefore, it is absolutely vital that the problems that can arise from teamwork are solved promptly. A problem that no one takes care of can delete all benefits of teamwork.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book About 'The Broom o the Cathery Knowes' and its Place in Tradition by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Versendung der Tagespost, Postbearbeitung, Postausgang (Unterweisung Bürokaufmann / -kauffrau) by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Die Bedeutung von Wissensmanagement und dem Instrument des 'Mikro-Artikels' by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Der Key Account Plan. Ein Instrument der Analyse und Entwicklung von strategisch wichtigen Schlüsselkunden by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Rückstellungen für nukleare Stilllegungs- und Entsorgungsverpflichtungen im IFRS-Konzernabschluss by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book 'The Art of Losing' - Relecting Elisabeth Bishop by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Das 'Risiko' von Erziehung und Sozialisation. Eine systemtheoretische Studie by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Zivilrecht, Öffentliches Recht oder Strafrecht: Welches Rechtsgebiet ist am wichtigsten? by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Der Markt für Logistikdienstleistungen. Entwicklung und Darstellung verschiedener Provider by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Die Krise der staatlichen Sozialsysteme als Chance für die Finanzdienstleistungsindustrie by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Der Verlauf des Ersten Punischen Krieges by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Massenmedien und Wahlbeteiligung by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Das Frauenbild in der Jugendliteratur der DDR by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Chancen und Risiken neuer Geschäftsmodelle in der Luftfahrt by Jonas Augustin
Cover of the book Eigenständigkeit, Lernentwicklungsbericht und Kompetenz - Momente eines 'anderen' Unterrichts by Jonas Augustin
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy