Classical Social Contract Theory

The Classical Social Contract Theories of Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau Compared

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, History & Theory
Cover of the book Classical Social Contract Theory by Sebastian Erckel, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Sebastian Erckel ISBN: 9783640326945
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: May 11, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Sebastian Erckel
ISBN: 9783640326945
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: May 11, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Essay from the year 2008 in the subject Politics - Political Theory and the History of Ideas Journal, grade: 80%= good, University of Kerala (Department of Political Science), course: Political Theory- Liberal Tradition, language: English, abstract: This essay compares the classical social contract theories of Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Different perceptions of the state of nature resulted in different ideas about the social contract and its emphasis on either security (Hobbes), individual rights (Locke) or the collective freedom of Rousseau's general will. Political philosophy is believed to have started with Plato's 'Republic', the first known sophisticated analysis of a fundamental question that humans have probably been concerned with much longer: how should human society be organised, i.e. who should rule and why? Plato believed that ruling required special training and skills and should therefore be left to an aristocracy of guardians who had received extensive training. While the notion that ruling requires expertise can hardly be denied there is also agreement among most philosophers that whoever qualifies for the job of ruling needs to do so with the interest of the people in mind. But what is the interest of the people and how can it be discovered? According to Plato, a necessary precondition for rulers is wisdom and that is why he wanted his guardians to be especially trained in philosophy. One may think that the people themselves should know what is best for them but somewhat surprisingly this idea has been rejected not just by Plato but also by many philosophers following him. Another approach is to link rule on Earth to a mandate received from a divine Creator. However, even the idea that humans could not exist without a government has been questioned, most notably by anarchism. Thus, the question of how political rule, the power to make decisions for others, could be justified is an essential one. Only legitimate rule creates obligation and without obligation it is hard to see how any form of society can survive. It is precisely for these elementary questions that social contract theories attempt to provide an answer for. The social contract can be seen as a device both for justifying not only rule itself but a particular type of rule, and demonstrating that political obligation can indeed be demanded. A unique feature of the classical social contract theories discussed in this paper is that they started out with an analysis of the state of nature.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay from the year 2008 in the subject Politics - Political Theory and the History of Ideas Journal, grade: 80%= good, University of Kerala (Department of Political Science), course: Political Theory- Liberal Tradition, language: English, abstract: This essay compares the classical social contract theories of Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Different perceptions of the state of nature resulted in different ideas about the social contract and its emphasis on either security (Hobbes), individual rights (Locke) or the collective freedom of Rousseau's general will. Political philosophy is believed to have started with Plato's 'Republic', the first known sophisticated analysis of a fundamental question that humans have probably been concerned with much longer: how should human society be organised, i.e. who should rule and why? Plato believed that ruling required special training and skills and should therefore be left to an aristocracy of guardians who had received extensive training. While the notion that ruling requires expertise can hardly be denied there is also agreement among most philosophers that whoever qualifies for the job of ruling needs to do so with the interest of the people in mind. But what is the interest of the people and how can it be discovered? According to Plato, a necessary precondition for rulers is wisdom and that is why he wanted his guardians to be especially trained in philosophy. One may think that the people themselves should know what is best for them but somewhat surprisingly this idea has been rejected not just by Plato but also by many philosophers following him. Another approach is to link rule on Earth to a mandate received from a divine Creator. However, even the idea that humans could not exist without a government has been questioned, most notably by anarchism. Thus, the question of how political rule, the power to make decisions for others, could be justified is an essential one. Only legitimate rule creates obligation and without obligation it is hard to see how any form of society can survive. It is precisely for these elementary questions that social contract theories attempt to provide an answer for. The social contract can be seen as a device both for justifying not only rule itself but a particular type of rule, and demonstrating that political obligation can indeed be demanded. A unique feature of the classical social contract theories discussed in this paper is that they started out with an analysis of the state of nature.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book A Project Management Methodology for Multimedia Projects - Analysis of Existing Strategies and Creation of a New Concept by Sebastian Erckel
Cover of the book The concept and impact of gender roles in Joe Orton s plays by Sebastian Erckel
Cover of the book Mafia - the history with Mario Puzo's Godfather in background by Sebastian Erckel
Cover of the book Fillmore Case Grammar by Sebastian Erckel
Cover of the book Language Policy, Biculturalism and Bilingualism by Sebastian Erckel
Cover of the book Some Notes on Marko Kraljevic (Prince Marko) by Sebastian Erckel
Cover of the book Entry strategies in the Chinese market by Sebastian Erckel
Cover of the book Metonymy and telic verbs by Sebastian Erckel
Cover of the book The Merger of DaimlerChrysler by Sebastian Erckel
Cover of the book The power of love to change the attitude to life as exemplified in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice by Sebastian Erckel
Cover of the book How do the ideas of economic theory help us to understand the operation of interfirm collaboration such as joint ventures and alliances by Sebastian Erckel
Cover of the book Was Evans-Pritchard a Structural-Functionalist? by Sebastian Erckel
Cover of the book The position of Rousseau on the Social Contract by Sebastian Erckel
Cover of the book The German-Jewish Relationship Question In The Light Of Human Cultural Evolution by Sebastian Erckel
Cover of the book Attitudes towards the child in children's literature: A Comparison of the Victorian Age and the Inter-War Period by Sebastian Erckel
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy