United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice

Principles, Politics, and Pragmatics

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, Arms Control, Reference & Language, Law, International
Cover of the book United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice by Zachary D. Kaufman, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Zachary D. Kaufman ISBN: 9780190243517
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: March 10, 2016
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Zachary D. Kaufman
ISBN: 9780190243517
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: March 10, 2016
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

In United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice: Principles, Politics, and Pragmatics, Zachary D. Kaufman explores the U.S. government's support for, or opposition to, certain transitional justice institutions. By first presenting an overview of possible responses to atrocities (such as war crimes tribunals) and then analyzing six historical case studies, Kaufman evaluates why and how the United States has pursued particular transitional justice options since World War II. This book challenges the "legalist" paradigm, which postulates that liberal states pursue war crimes tribunals because their decision-makers hold a principled commitment to the rule of law. Kaufman develops an alternative theory-"prudentialism"-which contends that any state (liberal or illiberal) may support bona fide war crimes tribunals. More generally, prudentialism proposes that states pursue transitional justice options, not out of strict adherence to certain principles, but as a result of a case-specific balancing of politics, pragmatics, and normative beliefs. Kaufman tests these two competing theories through the U.S. experience in six contexts: Germany and Japan after World War II, the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103, the 1990-1991 Iraqi offenses against Kuwaitis, the atrocities in the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, and the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Kaufman demonstrates that political and pragmatic factors featured as or more prominently in U.S. transitional justice policy than did U.S. government officials' normative beliefs. Kaufman thus concludes that, at least for the United States, prudentialism is superior to legalism as an explanatory theory in transitional justice policymaking.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In United States Law and Policy on Transitional Justice: Principles, Politics, and Pragmatics, Zachary D. Kaufman explores the U.S. government's support for, or opposition to, certain transitional justice institutions. By first presenting an overview of possible responses to atrocities (such as war crimes tribunals) and then analyzing six historical case studies, Kaufman evaluates why and how the United States has pursued particular transitional justice options since World War II. This book challenges the "legalist" paradigm, which postulates that liberal states pursue war crimes tribunals because their decision-makers hold a principled commitment to the rule of law. Kaufman develops an alternative theory-"prudentialism"-which contends that any state (liberal or illiberal) may support bona fide war crimes tribunals. More generally, prudentialism proposes that states pursue transitional justice options, not out of strict adherence to certain principles, but as a result of a case-specific balancing of politics, pragmatics, and normative beliefs. Kaufman tests these two competing theories through the U.S. experience in six contexts: Germany and Japan after World War II, the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103, the 1990-1991 Iraqi offenses against Kuwaitis, the atrocities in the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, and the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Kaufman demonstrates that political and pragmatic factors featured as or more prominently in U.S. transitional justice policy than did U.S. government officials' normative beliefs. Kaufman thus concludes that, at least for the United States, prudentialism is superior to legalism as an explanatory theory in transitional justice policymaking.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book Motion and the English Verb by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book The Green Tiger by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Under the Cope of Heaven by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Kosovo : What Everyone Needs To Know by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book They Knew Lincoln by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Curse Tablets and Binding Spells from the Ancient World by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Mike Nichols by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Queen Anne by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Sierra Leone by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book War From the Ground Up: Twenty-First Century Combat as Politics by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Atlantic Slave Trade: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Japan - With Audio Level 1 Factfiles Oxford Bookworms Library by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book The Hunter, the Stag, and the Mother of Animals by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Feeding the Flock by Zachary D. Kaufman
Cover of the book Politics in China by Zachary D. Kaufman
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy