The European Union and the World Trade Organisation - Two governance systems in trade policy: A selection of their differences, similarities and mutual influences

Two governance systems in trade policy: A selection of their differences, similarities and mutual influences

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book The European Union and the World Trade Organisation - Two governance systems in trade policy: A selection of their differences, similarities and mutual influences by Joanna Mastalerek, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Joanna Mastalerek ISBN: 9783638268752
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: April 16, 2004
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Joanna Mastalerek
ISBN: 9783638268752
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: April 16, 2004
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2004 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 1,0 (A), Hamburg University of Ecomomy and Policy (Political Science), course: Globalisation and European Governance, language: English, abstract: In general terms, both the European Union (EU) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) can be described as governance systems: 'Governance is about the structured ways and means in which the divergent preferences of interdependent actors are translated into policy choices to allocate values, so that the plurality of interests is transformed into co-ordinated action and the compliance of actors is achieved.'1 This essay cannot reflect all aspects of the two governance systems, but is limited to a selection of their differences, similarities and mutual influences. After the opening remark alludes to a similarity, the differences will be touched upon next. The individual characteristics of the EU and the WTO become particularly obvious in the institutional set-ups of the two organisations: In the case of the EU one deals with a supranational organisation, what means that the current 15 member states partly transfer sovereign rights to the organisation, thus rendering the EU a partly independent and powerful policy actor. In comparison, the WTO is an intergovernmental organisation, in which its 146 members negotiate without transferring any sovereignity to the organisation, thus depriving the WTO of any independence in policy decisions 2. The WTO is a broad international organisation, its members accounting for over 90 % of all trade in the world, whereas the EU, being a member of the WTO, is a geographically limited and closely integrated organisation. Even though the EU represents just 6 % of the world's population, it accounts for more than a fifth of global imports and exports3. Concerning the relationship between the two organisations, their origins had an important influence: The WTO was founded in 1995 as a successor of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) from 1947. [...] 1 Beate Kohler-Koch/ Rainer Eising (eds.): The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. London, New York: Routledge, 1999, p. 5. 2 Mary Farrell (ed.): EU and WTO regulatory frameworks. Complementarity or competition? London: Kogan Page, 1999, p. 44. 3 European Union: Making globalisation work for everyone.The European Union and world trade. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2003, p. 4.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2004 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 1,0 (A), Hamburg University of Ecomomy and Policy (Political Science), course: Globalisation and European Governance, language: English, abstract: In general terms, both the European Union (EU) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) can be described as governance systems: 'Governance is about the structured ways and means in which the divergent preferences of interdependent actors are translated into policy choices to allocate values, so that the plurality of interests is transformed into co-ordinated action and the compliance of actors is achieved.'1 This essay cannot reflect all aspects of the two governance systems, but is limited to a selection of their differences, similarities and mutual influences. After the opening remark alludes to a similarity, the differences will be touched upon next. The individual characteristics of the EU and the WTO become particularly obvious in the institutional set-ups of the two organisations: In the case of the EU one deals with a supranational organisation, what means that the current 15 member states partly transfer sovereign rights to the organisation, thus rendering the EU a partly independent and powerful policy actor. In comparison, the WTO is an intergovernmental organisation, in which its 146 members negotiate without transferring any sovereignity to the organisation, thus depriving the WTO of any independence in policy decisions 2. The WTO is a broad international organisation, its members accounting for over 90 % of all trade in the world, whereas the EU, being a member of the WTO, is a geographically limited and closely integrated organisation. Even though the EU represents just 6 % of the world's population, it accounts for more than a fifth of global imports and exports3. Concerning the relationship between the two organisations, their origins had an important influence: The WTO was founded in 1995 as a successor of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) from 1947. [...] 1 Beate Kohler-Koch/ Rainer Eising (eds.): The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. London, New York: Routledge, 1999, p. 5. 2 Mary Farrell (ed.): EU and WTO regulatory frameworks. Complementarity or competition? London: Kogan Page, 1999, p. 44. 3 European Union: Making globalisation work for everyone.The European Union and world trade. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2003, p. 4.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Critically evaluate the view that the Internet facilitates not local cultures but cultural domination by transnational corporations by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Civil-military cooperation as a vital part in the stabilization-process in Afghanistan by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book IBM Pilot Head Office (Cosham, Hampshire, 1970-71) and IBM Technical Park (Greenford, Middlesex, 1975-1980) - Architecture as Part of the Market oriented Corporate Culture by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Accommodating growth: The concept of traditional neighborhood development in Westhaven by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book A discussion on the article 'Generalised improvement in speech production for subject with reproduction conduction aphasia' by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book A Comparative Analysis of Internal and External Credit Ratings by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Work-life balance in organisations by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Humour theory and practice: A study on a jumping frog by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Reflective Writing by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book The Role of Education In Fighting Inequality by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Gender Ambiguity in Shakespeare's Macbeth by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Gender and the City: Politics of Space in Contemporary New York Pop Culture by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Teaching pronunciation. The role of the native speaker by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Washington Irving: The Alhambra His inspiration to write the tales by Joanna Mastalerek
Cover of the book Managing the Economy. Economical Effects of Reduced Government Spending by Joanna Mastalerek
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy