Television Courtroom Broadcasting Effects

The Empirical Research and the Supreme Court Challenge

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Media & the Law, Courts, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Television Courtroom Broadcasting Effects by Paul Lambert, UPA
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Paul Lambert ISBN: 9780761860068
Publisher: UPA Publication: July 5, 2013
Imprint: UPA Language: English
Author: Paul Lambert
ISBN: 9780761860068
Publisher: UPA
Publication: July 5, 2013
Imprint: UPA
Language: English

Court and policy makers have increasingly had to deal with—and sometimes even embrace—technology, from podcasts to the Internet. Televised courtroom broadcasting especially remains an issue. The debate surrounding the US Supreme Court and federal courts, as well as the great disparity between different forms of television courtroom broadcasting, rages on. What are the effects of television courtroom broadcasting? Does research support the arguments for or against? Despite three Supreme Court cases on television courtroom broadcasting, the common thread between the cases has not been highlighted. The Supreme Court in these cases maintains a common theme: there is not a sufficient body of research on the effects of televising courtroom proceedings to resolve the debate in a confident manner.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Court and policy makers have increasingly had to deal with—and sometimes even embrace—technology, from podcasts to the Internet. Televised courtroom broadcasting especially remains an issue. The debate surrounding the US Supreme Court and federal courts, as well as the great disparity between different forms of television courtroom broadcasting, rages on. What are the effects of television courtroom broadcasting? Does research support the arguments for or against? Despite three Supreme Court cases on television courtroom broadcasting, the common thread between the cases has not been highlighted. The Supreme Court in these cases maintains a common theme: there is not a sufficient body of research on the effects of televising courtroom proceedings to resolve the debate in a confident manner.

More books from UPA

Cover of the book Feeding the Five Thousand by Paul Lambert
Cover of the book Play and Performance by Paul Lambert
Cover of the book The Progressive Revolution by Paul Lambert
Cover of the book The Jews of North Africa by Paul Lambert
Cover of the book Differentiated Instruction by Paul Lambert
Cover of the book Surrogate Terrorists by Paul Lambert
Cover of the book Rediscovering Japan, Reintroducing Christendom by Paul Lambert
Cover of the book Major Revision Facts in Mathematics by Paul Lambert
Cover of the book Image and Imagination by Paul Lambert
Cover of the book Global Perspectives on Physical Education and After-School Sport Programs by Paul Lambert
Cover of the book Crisis as an Opportunity by Paul Lambert
Cover of the book Oblivion or Utopia by Paul Lambert
Cover of the book Postmodern Racial Dialectics by Paul Lambert
Cover of the book Reading, Writing, and Discussing at the Graduate Level by Paul Lambert
Cover of the book The Great Famine & Genocide in Iran by Paul Lambert
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy