Stanford Law Review: Volume 64, Issue 3 - March 2012

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Gender & the Law, Jurisprudence
Cover of the book Stanford Law Review: Volume 64, Issue 3 - March 2012 by Stanford Law Review, Quid Pro, LLC
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Stanford Law Review ISBN: 9781610279468
Publisher: Quid Pro, LLC Publication: April 18, 2014
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Stanford Law Review
ISBN: 9781610279468
Publisher: Quid Pro, LLC
Publication: April 18, 2014
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

A leading law journal features a digital edition as part of its worldwide distribution, using quality ebook formatting and active links. The March 2012 issue of the Stanford Law Review contains studies of law, economics, and social policy by recognized scholars on diverse topics of interest to the academic and professional community.

Contents for the March 2012 issue (number 3 of Volume 64) include:

Prosecuting the Exonerated: Actual Innocence and the Double Jeopardy Clause
By Jordan M. Barry
From Multiculturalism to Technique: Feminism, Culture, and the Conflict of Laws Style
By Karen Knop, Ralf Michaels & Annelise Riles
Fragmentation Nodes: A Study in Financial Innovation, Complexity, and Systemic Risk
By Kathryn Judge
Note: Insurmountable Obstacles: Structural Errors, Procedural Default, and Ineffective Assistance
By Amy Knight Burns
Comment: The Gulf Coast Claims Facility and the Deepwater Horizon Litigation: Judicial Regulation of Private Compensation Schemes
By Colin McDonell

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

A leading law journal features a digital edition as part of its worldwide distribution, using quality ebook formatting and active links. The March 2012 issue of the Stanford Law Review contains studies of law, economics, and social policy by recognized scholars on diverse topics of interest to the academic and professional community.

Contents for the March 2012 issue (number 3 of Volume 64) include:

Prosecuting the Exonerated: Actual Innocence and the Double Jeopardy Clause
By Jordan M. Barry
From Multiculturalism to Technique: Feminism, Culture, and the Conflict of Laws Style
By Karen Knop, Ralf Michaels & Annelise Riles
Fragmentation Nodes: A Study in Financial Innovation, Complexity, and Systemic Risk
By Kathryn Judge
Note: Insurmountable Obstacles: Structural Errors, Procedural Default, and Ineffective Assistance
By Amy Knight Burns
Comment: The Gulf Coast Claims Facility and the Deepwater Horizon Litigation: Judicial Regulation of Private Compensation Schemes
By Colin McDonell

More books from Quid Pro, LLC

Cover of the book The Book Club Murder by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Law and the Search for Community by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book New England Law Review: Volume 51, Number 1 - Winter 2017 by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 3 - January 2017 by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Yale Law Journal: Volume 122, Number 6 - April 2013 by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book New England Law Review: Volume 48, Number 3 - Spring 2014 by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book A Hidden Madness by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 126, Number 5 - March 2013 by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book Clearing the Thickets: A History of Antebellum Alabama by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book New England Law Review: Volume 50, Number 1 - Fall 2015 by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book The Intersection of Biotechnology and Health Issues in IP Law: RIPL's Special Issue 2011 by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book New England Law Review: Volume 48, Number 1 - Fall 2013 by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book The Changing Academic Market: General Trends and a Berkeley Case Study by Stanford Law Review
Cover of the book The Late Doctor Savage by Stanford Law Review
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy