Sociobiology: A Controversial Approach

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science
Cover of the book Sociobiology: A Controversial Approach by Inga Rupprecht, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Inga Rupprecht ISBN: 9783638570879
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: November 19, 2006
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Inga Rupprecht
ISBN: 9783638570879
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: November 19, 2006
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Essay from the year 2006 in the subject Sociology - Individual, Groups, Society, grade: 1,3 (A), University of Lincoln (ESSD Division), course: Social Theory, 16 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: The question as to how far biological factors, or more specifically genes, influence our human behaviour and consequently social phenomena, for example the foundation of a family, is fascinating for science and public; especially since the discovery of the human genes. Nevertheless, there are still great controversies between social scientists and adherents of sociobiology concerning the central question; if it is culture and self-consciousness respectively, or genes that dominate human social behaviour. Even though Max Weber already recognized that our biological heredity may have an impact on social phenomena, he did not regard biology as sufficiently developed enough to be really helpful for sociology. (Kaye, 1986) It was in 1975 when Edward O. Wilson's book 'Sociobiology: The New Synthesis' became the trigger for new public discussions about how far, if at all, concepts of biological evolution could be relevant for explaining social behaviour in human societies. The term 'sociobiology' constitutes a concept which can be described as a synthesis of neo-Darwinism ('survival of the fittest' combined with Mendel's laws of heredity) and ethology (the study of behaviour). (Gregory, 1979) The problem with Wilson's work was that, although he focused mainly on animal societies, he claimed that his findings were valid for human beings as well. (Wilson, 1979 in Gregory et al.; Wallace and Wolf, 2006) The reactions of social scientists and the scientific media reached from 'deep scepticism' (Goldsmith, 1991: Preface) and 'stiff resistance'. In this essay I will first have a look at the general assumptions and arguments of sociobiologists and how they want to intertwine biological and sociological explanations of human behaviour and social structures. After that I will discuss the manifold criticisms which were made by opponents of the sociobiological approach and compare some of them directly with responses of sociobiologists. To get a general idea of the possible contributions sociobiology can make to social science in explaining human beings' social behaviour biologically, I will describe some research areas of the perspective. I am also going to show that altruism is phenomenon which causes explanatory difficulties. In the conclusion at the end of the essay the possible contributions of sociobiology to social science and the explanation of human behaviour should be considered.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay from the year 2006 in the subject Sociology - Individual, Groups, Society, grade: 1,3 (A), University of Lincoln (ESSD Division), course: Social Theory, 16 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: The question as to how far biological factors, or more specifically genes, influence our human behaviour and consequently social phenomena, for example the foundation of a family, is fascinating for science and public; especially since the discovery of the human genes. Nevertheless, there are still great controversies between social scientists and adherents of sociobiology concerning the central question; if it is culture and self-consciousness respectively, or genes that dominate human social behaviour. Even though Max Weber already recognized that our biological heredity may have an impact on social phenomena, he did not regard biology as sufficiently developed enough to be really helpful for sociology. (Kaye, 1986) It was in 1975 when Edward O. Wilson's book 'Sociobiology: The New Synthesis' became the trigger for new public discussions about how far, if at all, concepts of biological evolution could be relevant for explaining social behaviour in human societies. The term 'sociobiology' constitutes a concept which can be described as a synthesis of neo-Darwinism ('survival of the fittest' combined with Mendel's laws of heredity) and ethology (the study of behaviour). (Gregory, 1979) The problem with Wilson's work was that, although he focused mainly on animal societies, he claimed that his findings were valid for human beings as well. (Wilson, 1979 in Gregory et al.; Wallace and Wolf, 2006) The reactions of social scientists and the scientific media reached from 'deep scepticism' (Goldsmith, 1991: Preface) and 'stiff resistance'. In this essay I will first have a look at the general assumptions and arguments of sociobiologists and how they want to intertwine biological and sociological explanations of human behaviour and social structures. After that I will discuss the manifold criticisms which were made by opponents of the sociobiological approach and compare some of them directly with responses of sociobiologists. To get a general idea of the possible contributions sociobiology can make to social science in explaining human beings' social behaviour biologically, I will describe some research areas of the perspective. I am also going to show that altruism is phenomenon which causes explanatory difficulties. In the conclusion at the end of the essay the possible contributions of sociobiology to social science and the explanation of human behaviour should be considered.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book An Ethical Debate on Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Human Dignity or Research Freedom? by Inga Rupprecht
Cover of the book The Holocaust - A Literary Inspiration? by Inga Rupprecht
Cover of the book Ryle vs. official doctrine on how to explain an intentional action by Inga Rupprecht
Cover of the book Die keynesianische Arbeitslosigkeit by Inga Rupprecht
Cover of the book The Last COIN Lecture by Inga Rupprecht
Cover of the book The Powers of Articulation by Inga Rupprecht
Cover of the book The Credit on Real Estate - Local Value and Relevance for the Construction Financing in Germany and Denmark by Inga Rupprecht
Cover of the book Marketing communication by Inga Rupprecht
Cover of the book Transfer pricing for multinational enterprises. An integrated approach by Inga Rupprecht
Cover of the book Religion and atheism in Douglas Adams' 'Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy' by Inga Rupprecht
Cover of the book 'You have no choice but to live in your time' - A Deconstruction of Martin Harrison's poetry collection 'Summer' by Inga Rupprecht
Cover of the book Wertorientierte Anreizgestaltung by Inga Rupprecht
Cover of the book Chicano Murals and the Construction of Home by Inga Rupprecht
Cover of the book Impact of Financial Innovations on the Subprime Mortgage Crisis by Inga Rupprecht
Cover of the book Case Study: Rubbermaid Inc. by Inga Rupprecht
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy