Religious Pluralism and Islamic Law

Dhimmis and Others in the Empire of Law

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Religion & Spirituality
Cover of the book Religious Pluralism and Islamic Law by Anver M. Emon, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Anver M. Emon ISBN: 9780191637742
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: July 26, 2012
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Anver M. Emon
ISBN: 9780191637742
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: July 26, 2012
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

The question of tolerance and Islam is not a new one. Polemicists are certain that Islam is not a tolerant religion. As evidence they point to the rules governing the treatment of non-Muslim permanent residents in Muslim lands, namely the dhimmi rules that are at the center of this study. These rules, when read in isolation, are certainly discriminatory in nature. They legitimate discriminatory treatment on grounds of what could be said to be religious faith and religious difference. The dhimmi rules are often invoked as proof-positive of the inherent intolerance of the Islamic faith (and thereby of any believing Muslim) toward the non-Muslim. This book addresses the problem of the concept of 'tolerance' for understanding the significance of the dhimmi rules that governed and regulated non-Muslim permanent residents in Islamic lands. In doing so, it suggests that the Islamic legal treatment of non-Muslims is symptomatic of the more general challenge of governing a diverse polity. Far from being constitutive of an Islamic ethos, the dhimmi rules raise important thematic questions about Rule of Law, governance, and how the pursuit of pluralism through the institutions of law and governance is a messy business. As argued throughout this book, an inescapable, and all-too-often painful, bottom line in the pursuit of pluralism is that it requires impositions and limitations on freedoms that are considered central and fundamental to an individual's well-being, but which must be limited for some people in some circumstances for reasons extending well beyond the claims of a given individual. A comparison to recent cases from the United States, United Kingdom, and the European Court of Human Rights reveals that however different and distant premodern Islamic and modern democratic societies may be in terms of time, space, and values, legal systems face similar challenges when governing a populace in which minority and majority groups diverge on the meaning and implication of values deemed fundamental to a particular polity.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The question of tolerance and Islam is not a new one. Polemicists are certain that Islam is not a tolerant religion. As evidence they point to the rules governing the treatment of non-Muslim permanent residents in Muslim lands, namely the dhimmi rules that are at the center of this study. These rules, when read in isolation, are certainly discriminatory in nature. They legitimate discriminatory treatment on grounds of what could be said to be religious faith and religious difference. The dhimmi rules are often invoked as proof-positive of the inherent intolerance of the Islamic faith (and thereby of any believing Muslim) toward the non-Muslim. This book addresses the problem of the concept of 'tolerance' for understanding the significance of the dhimmi rules that governed and regulated non-Muslim permanent residents in Islamic lands. In doing so, it suggests that the Islamic legal treatment of non-Muslims is symptomatic of the more general challenge of governing a diverse polity. Far from being constitutive of an Islamic ethos, the dhimmi rules raise important thematic questions about Rule of Law, governance, and how the pursuit of pluralism through the institutions of law and governance is a messy business. As argued throughout this book, an inescapable, and all-too-often painful, bottom line in the pursuit of pluralism is that it requires impositions and limitations on freedoms that are considered central and fundamental to an individual's well-being, but which must be limited for some people in some circumstances for reasons extending well beyond the claims of a given individual. A comparison to recent cases from the United States, United Kingdom, and the European Court of Human Rights reveals that however different and distant premodern Islamic and modern democratic societies may be in terms of time, space, and values, legal systems face similar challenges when governing a populace in which minority and majority groups diverge on the meaning and implication of values deemed fundamental to a particular polity.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book The English Constitution by Anver M. Emon
Cover of the book Woodrow Wilson by Anver M. Emon
Cover of the book The Lost Domain by Anver M. Emon
Cover of the book The UN Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses by Anver M. Emon
Cover of the book Dramatic Geography by Anver M. Emon
Cover of the book Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics by Anver M. Emon
Cover of the book Emotional Choices by Anver M. Emon
Cover of the book Imagination and Convention by Anver M. Emon
Cover of the book The Demonic in the Political Thought of Eusebius of Caesarea by Anver M. Emon
Cover of the book Well-Being and Death by Anver M. Emon
Cover of the book Carnivore Ecology and Conservation by Anver M. Emon
Cover of the book Competition Policy for the New Era by Anver M. Emon
Cover of the book Indian Cinema: A Very Short Introduction by Anver M. Emon
Cover of the book Horizontal Agreements and Cartels in EU Competition Law by Anver M. Emon
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law by Anver M. Emon
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy