Passive Structures in Singapore English

Nonfiction, Entertainment, Drama, Anthologies
Cover of the book Passive Structures in Singapore English by Dominik Lorenz, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Dominik Lorenz ISBN: 9783638719087
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: May 2, 2007
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Dominik Lorenz
ISBN: 9783638719087
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: May 2, 2007
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject American Studies - Linguistics, grade: 2, University of Freiburg, course: Proseminar I, 12 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Ho and Platt (1993:1) argue that Singaporean English is a particularly interesting indigenized, or nativized, speech variety because it is so widely used and fills so many functions. I can confirm Ho and Platt's statement, since I was in Singapore in 2004. It was not difficult to notice Singapore English as a speech variety. This sparked my interest in participating in the proseminar 'English in Singapore' and consequently in researching into a certain grammatical phenomenon in Singapore English, namely the passive voice. In this term paper, a short analysis of the two passive structures specific to Colloquial Singapore English (the so-called kena passive and the give passive) will be presented. Further on, we the get passive will be examined. We will show that give- and kena-constructions are derived from the languages of Chinese and Malay, respectively. The bigger part of this paper will be to examine the overall frequencies thereof. Which of the two passive constructions will be closer in structure to the standard form? A personal analysis will help us to answer this question, always with the hidden desire to finally come up with a reasonable conclusion towards the end of the paper. We will probably have a winner of the competing substrate form and we will hopefully find out which passive construction is the most productive one in Singapore English. Moreover, we want to compare the frequency of the kena-passive with the getpassive's frequency in a corpus-based analysis. Admittedly, the corpus-based study will be relatively restrictive and not quite large in size. In addition, the give-passive will be ignored due to its rarity. Further on, we want to compare passive voice in Singapore with the passive in Standard English. To manage this, after having presented the development of Singapore, its multilingualism and English as its most common language, we will define some basic terms, which will be used in this term paper. After that, we will explain the corpus and the methodology used. In the end, we will sum up the findings and we will discuss my own study. Perhaps, there are possibilities how to do it better next time or there are other things that could be done.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject American Studies - Linguistics, grade: 2, University of Freiburg, course: Proseminar I, 12 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Ho and Platt (1993:1) argue that Singaporean English is a particularly interesting indigenized, or nativized, speech variety because it is so widely used and fills so many functions. I can confirm Ho and Platt's statement, since I was in Singapore in 2004. It was not difficult to notice Singapore English as a speech variety. This sparked my interest in participating in the proseminar 'English in Singapore' and consequently in researching into a certain grammatical phenomenon in Singapore English, namely the passive voice. In this term paper, a short analysis of the two passive structures specific to Colloquial Singapore English (the so-called kena passive and the give passive) will be presented. Further on, we the get passive will be examined. We will show that give- and kena-constructions are derived from the languages of Chinese and Malay, respectively. The bigger part of this paper will be to examine the overall frequencies thereof. Which of the two passive constructions will be closer in structure to the standard form? A personal analysis will help us to answer this question, always with the hidden desire to finally come up with a reasonable conclusion towards the end of the paper. We will probably have a winner of the competing substrate form and we will hopefully find out which passive construction is the most productive one in Singapore English. Moreover, we want to compare the frequency of the kena-passive with the getpassive's frequency in a corpus-based analysis. Admittedly, the corpus-based study will be relatively restrictive and not quite large in size. In addition, the give-passive will be ignored due to its rarity. Further on, we want to compare passive voice in Singapore with the passive in Standard English. To manage this, after having presented the development of Singapore, its multilingualism and English as its most common language, we will define some basic terms, which will be used in this term paper. After that, we will explain the corpus and the methodology used. In the end, we will sum up the findings and we will discuss my own study. Perhaps, there are possibilities how to do it better next time or there are other things that could be done.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Experience on specific problems - Joint ventures between Hong Kong company and company from the local government of the People's Republic of China (developing country) by Dominik Lorenz
Cover of the book Dyslexia - the problem of proper reading by Dominik Lorenz
Cover of the book How India Attracts Foreign Investors by Dominik Lorenz
Cover of the book Work Stress. Why Organisations should focus on it and provide effective examples by Dominik Lorenz
Cover of the book Privatising the military use of force by Dominik Lorenz
Cover of the book Case Study: PeoplePC: Is there a free lunch? by Dominik Lorenz
Cover of the book Individual and State in William Shakespeare's 'A Midsummer Night's Dream' by Dominik Lorenz
Cover of the book Decentralisation within the EU: Committee of the Regions - an undemocratic talking workshop? by Dominik Lorenz
Cover of the book A Comparative Analysis of Internal and External Credit Ratings by Dominik Lorenz
Cover of the book Paper on specific case study of Latvia (EU)/Russia border by Dominik Lorenz
Cover of the book The International Corpus of English (ICE) by Dominik Lorenz
Cover of the book The Psychodrama in Drama Pedagogy by Dominik Lorenz
Cover of the book The role of the IMF in general and its role in Kosova by Dominik Lorenz
Cover of the book Minimum Wage Legislation in Australia by Dominik Lorenz
Cover of the book The Americans' and Asians' Ideas about Each Other in T.C. Boyle's 'East is East' by Dominik Lorenz
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy