Must We Kill the Thing We Love?

Emersonian Perfectionism and the Films of Alfred Hitchcock

Nonfiction, Entertainment, Film, History & Criticism, Performing Arts
Cover of the book Must We Kill the Thing We Love? by William Rothman, Columbia University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: William Rothman ISBN: 9780231537308
Publisher: Columbia University Press Publication: April 8, 2014
Imprint: Columbia University Press Language: English
Author: William Rothman
ISBN: 9780231537308
Publisher: Columbia University Press
Publication: April 8, 2014
Imprint: Columbia University Press
Language: English

William Rothman argues that the driving force of Hitchcock’s work was his struggle to reconcile the dark vision of his favorite Oscar Wilde quote, “Each man kills the thing he loves,” with the quintessentially American philosophy, articulated in Emerson’s writings, that gave classical Hollywood movies of the New Deal era their extraordinary combination of popularity and artistic seriousness. A Hitchcock thriller could be a comedy of remarriage or a melodrama of an unknown woman, both Emersonian genres, except for the murderous villain and godlike author, Hitchcock, who pulls the villain’s strings-and ours. Because Hitchcock believed that the camera has a murderous aspect, the question “What if anything justifies killing?,” which every Hitchcock film engages, was for him a disturbing question about his own art. Tracing the trajectory of Hitchcock’s career, Rothman discerns a progression in the films’ meditations on murder and artistic creation. This progression culminates in Marnie (1964), Hitchcock’s most controversial film, in which Hitchcock overcame his ambivalence and fully embraced the Emersonian worldview he had always also resisted. Reading key Emerson passages with the degree of attention he accords to Hitchcock sequences, Rothman discovers surprising affinities between Hitchcock’s way of thinking cinematically and the philosophical way of thinking Emerson’s essays exemplify. He finds that the terms in which Emerson thought about reality, about our “flux of moods,” about what it is within us that never changes, about freedom, about America, about reading, about writing, and about thinking are remarkably pertinent to our experience of films and to thinking and writing about them. He also reflects on the implications of this discovery, not only for Hitchcock scholarship but also for film criticism in general.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

William Rothman argues that the driving force of Hitchcock’s work was his struggle to reconcile the dark vision of his favorite Oscar Wilde quote, “Each man kills the thing he loves,” with the quintessentially American philosophy, articulated in Emerson’s writings, that gave classical Hollywood movies of the New Deal era their extraordinary combination of popularity and artistic seriousness. A Hitchcock thriller could be a comedy of remarriage or a melodrama of an unknown woman, both Emersonian genres, except for the murderous villain and godlike author, Hitchcock, who pulls the villain’s strings-and ours. Because Hitchcock believed that the camera has a murderous aspect, the question “What if anything justifies killing?,” which every Hitchcock film engages, was for him a disturbing question about his own art. Tracing the trajectory of Hitchcock’s career, Rothman discerns a progression in the films’ meditations on murder and artistic creation. This progression culminates in Marnie (1964), Hitchcock’s most controversial film, in which Hitchcock overcame his ambivalence and fully embraced the Emersonian worldview he had always also resisted. Reading key Emerson passages with the degree of attention he accords to Hitchcock sequences, Rothman discovers surprising affinities between Hitchcock’s way of thinking cinematically and the philosophical way of thinking Emerson’s essays exemplify. He finds that the terms in which Emerson thought about reality, about our “flux of moods,” about what it is within us that never changes, about freedom, about America, about reading, about writing, and about thinking are remarkably pertinent to our experience of films and to thinking and writing about them. He also reflects on the implications of this discovery, not only for Hitchcock scholarship but also for film criticism in general.

More books from Columbia University Press

Cover of the book Paving the Great Way by William Rothman
Cover of the book Why Jane Austen? by William Rothman
Cover of the book Head, Eyes, Flesh, Blood by William Rothman
Cover of the book Sibling Action by William Rothman
Cover of the book The Aesthetics of Everyday Life by William Rothman
Cover of the book The Columbia Guide to East African Literature in English Since 1945 by William Rothman
Cover of the book The Church Confronts Modernity by William Rothman
Cover of the book Just Living by William Rothman
Cover of the book The Miracle Myth by William Rothman
Cover of the book A Short History of Opera by William Rothman
Cover of the book From Extreme Violence to the Problem of Civility by William Rothman
Cover of the book Not Like a Native Speaker by William Rothman
Cover of the book Japan and the Culture of the Four Seasons by William Rothman
Cover of the book The Caring Heirs of Doctor Samuel Bard by William Rothman
Cover of the book Winged Faith by William Rothman
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy