Innovation and EU competition law - a trade-off? The next generation Broadband Network in Germany from a legal and economic perspective

a trade-off? The next generation Broadband Network in Germany from a legal and economic perspective

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Innovation and EU competition law - a trade-off? The next generation Broadband Network in Germany from a legal and economic perspective by Daniel Neugebauer, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Daniel Neugebauer ISBN: 9783638620543
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: April 4, 2007
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Daniel Neugebauer
ISBN: 9783638620543
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: April 4, 2007
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 1,5, University of Twente (School of Management and Governance), course: European Economic Policies, 17 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Broadband development is considered to be central to economic growth in a knowledge-based economy. In Germany, the market leader (Deutsche Telekom) on the telecommunication market recently installed a 'next generation' high-speed network (so called VDSL), which is able to transfer phone calls, internet and TV through only one pair of wire to the consumer. The company invested more than 3 Billion Euro. Due to these enormous costs, it claimed to be allowed to refuse competitors access to its new network. If those competitors would be allowed to use the new network, Telekom threatened to stop all investments into this technology, as it would not be profitable. The German Government followed the claim by adopting a new law in December 2006, which was often said to be a 'lex Telekom' and guarantees 'regulatory holidays' for the new network. The European Commission argues that the protection of a new technology against competitors is against EU competition law and opened a procedure against the German government on the same day. The question is, whether the strict EU competition law in this case prevents innovation. Starting with the liberalization of the telecommunication market in 1988, the policies of the European Union can be called a 'success story'. From state-run monopolies and imperfect competitive conditions with high barriers for new firms to enter the market, the situation has changed dramatically until today: A number of new companies entered the market, prices decreased significantly, and the traditional staterun monopolies lost market shares. Where those monopoly-like situations remain, the EU aims to prevent operators from abusing market power to harm consumers or impede competitors. At the same time, the EU wants to facilitate widespread deployment of new and innovative technologies. Under the heading 'i2010', the digital economy component of the renewed Lisbon strategy, the greater use of telecommunication technologies is said to boost productivity throughout Europe, and generate new services and create jobs. To realize the conditions for a flourishing ecommunications environment, the EU has established a detailed regulatory policy. The so-called 'Article 7 procedure' allows national Regulatory Authorities to put obligations on companies with significant market power, whenever a persistent market failure occurs. [...]

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 1,5, University of Twente (School of Management and Governance), course: European Economic Policies, 17 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Broadband development is considered to be central to economic growth in a knowledge-based economy. In Germany, the market leader (Deutsche Telekom) on the telecommunication market recently installed a 'next generation' high-speed network (so called VDSL), which is able to transfer phone calls, internet and TV through only one pair of wire to the consumer. The company invested more than 3 Billion Euro. Due to these enormous costs, it claimed to be allowed to refuse competitors access to its new network. If those competitors would be allowed to use the new network, Telekom threatened to stop all investments into this technology, as it would not be profitable. The German Government followed the claim by adopting a new law in December 2006, which was often said to be a 'lex Telekom' and guarantees 'regulatory holidays' for the new network. The European Commission argues that the protection of a new technology against competitors is against EU competition law and opened a procedure against the German government on the same day. The question is, whether the strict EU competition law in this case prevents innovation. Starting with the liberalization of the telecommunication market in 1988, the policies of the European Union can be called a 'success story'. From state-run monopolies and imperfect competitive conditions with high barriers for new firms to enter the market, the situation has changed dramatically until today: A number of new companies entered the market, prices decreased significantly, and the traditional staterun monopolies lost market shares. Where those monopoly-like situations remain, the EU aims to prevent operators from abusing market power to harm consumers or impede competitors. At the same time, the EU wants to facilitate widespread deployment of new and innovative technologies. Under the heading 'i2010', the digital economy component of the renewed Lisbon strategy, the greater use of telecommunication technologies is said to boost productivity throughout Europe, and generate new services and create jobs. To realize the conditions for a flourishing ecommunications environment, the EU has established a detailed regulatory policy. The so-called 'Article 7 procedure' allows national Regulatory Authorities to put obligations on companies with significant market power, whenever a persistent market failure occurs. [...]

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book The Creoleness of Middle English by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Global Sourcing - The strategic reorientation of purchasing by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Multiperspectival narration in Ian McEwan's 'Atonement' by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book A Comparison of Sourcing Strategies in the Apparel Industry. Case Study of the H&M Group and Inditex by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book 'A single currency for Europe is a good thing and the sooner the UK joins the Euro, the better.' Do you agree? by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Social Deixis: The development of second person pronouns from Old English to the present by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Bewährungshilfe, Gerichtshilfe und JustuS by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book A Discussion of Critical Legal Studies' Claim of Legal Indeterminacy by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Weighing the Costs and Benefits of Mexican Immigration by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Traditional use of plant resources by bankariya ethnic group in Makawanpur district, central Nepal by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Was the victory over Hitler in the Great Patriotic War achieved inspite of Stalins policies ? by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book Sibling Constellations in 'White Teeth' (2000) and 'Britz' (2007) by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book The european automobile industry lobby against the european emission politics by Daniel Neugebauer
Cover of the book We are living in an era of globalisation, yet there is evidence that distance still matters, and increasingly so by Daniel Neugebauer
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy