Fezzes in the River

Identity Politics and European Diplomacy in the Middle East on the Eve of World War II

Nonfiction, History, Middle East, Modern, 20th Century
Cover of the book Fezzes in the River by Sarah D. Shields, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Sarah D. Shields ISBN: 9780199793006
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: March 16, 2011
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Sarah D. Shields
ISBN: 9780199793006
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: March 16, 2011
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

Self-determination, imported into the Middle East on the heels of World War I, held out the promise of democratic governance to the former territories of the Ottoman Empire. The new states that European Great Powers carved out of the multilingual, multiethnic, and multireligious empire were expected to adhere to new forms of affiliation that emphasized previously unimportant differences. In 1936, the new Republic of Turkey lay claim to Antioch and the Sanjak (province) of Alexandretta, which the French had ruled since 1920 as part of its mandate over Syria. Turkey's ambassador made a passionate argument that Alexandretta was a homeland of the Turks, a place that was essentially Turkish. With France and Turkey unable to reach agreement, the League of Nations was called in to broker a compromise consistent with the spirit of the new democratic impulse, one of many disputes that it had to adjudicate as self-determination became a rallying cry for peoples who wanted to form new nations around their collective identities. Over the next four years, Turkey struggled for recognition of its claims to the territory, while Turkish authorities competed to win hearts and minds in Alexandretta province. In this nuanced narrative, Sarah D. Shields illuminates how the people of this region-about a quarter of a million Arabs, Armenians, Circassians, Kurds, and Turks-were forced to choose between Turkish and Arab identities. In the end, Shields shows, national identities played no role in the outcome of the dispute. What happened on the ground in this contested region was determined by Great Power diplomacy amidst the crisis of European democracy in the late 1930s, a story skillfully interwoven with the violent struggles that took place on the streets of the province. In the end, a new kind of identity politics was unleashed that redefined belonging, transformed nationalism, and set in motion the process of dysfunctional democracy that continues to plague the Middle East.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Self-determination, imported into the Middle East on the heels of World War I, held out the promise of democratic governance to the former territories of the Ottoman Empire. The new states that European Great Powers carved out of the multilingual, multiethnic, and multireligious empire were expected to adhere to new forms of affiliation that emphasized previously unimportant differences. In 1936, the new Republic of Turkey lay claim to Antioch and the Sanjak (province) of Alexandretta, which the French had ruled since 1920 as part of its mandate over Syria. Turkey's ambassador made a passionate argument that Alexandretta was a homeland of the Turks, a place that was essentially Turkish. With France and Turkey unable to reach agreement, the League of Nations was called in to broker a compromise consistent with the spirit of the new democratic impulse, one of many disputes that it had to adjudicate as self-determination became a rallying cry for peoples who wanted to form new nations around their collective identities. Over the next four years, Turkey struggled for recognition of its claims to the territory, while Turkish authorities competed to win hearts and minds in Alexandretta province. In this nuanced narrative, Sarah D. Shields illuminates how the people of this region-about a quarter of a million Arabs, Armenians, Circassians, Kurds, and Turks-were forced to choose between Turkish and Arab identities. In the end, Shields shows, national identities played no role in the outcome of the dispute. What happened on the ground in this contested region was determined by Great Power diplomacy amidst the crisis of European democracy in the late 1930s, a story skillfully interwoven with the violent struggles that took place on the streets of the province. In the end, a new kind of identity politics was unleashed that redefined belonging, transformed nationalism, and set in motion the process of dysfunctional democracy that continues to plague the Middle East.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book The Censorship Effect by Sarah D. Shields
Cover of the book After Prostate Cancer by Sarah D. Shields
Cover of the book Enchanted Evenings by Sarah D. Shields
Cover of the book The Ancient Emotion of Disgust by Sarah D. Shields
Cover of the book Fallen Blue Knights by Sarah D. Shields
Cover of the book Ethics and Cyber Warfare by Sarah D. Shields
Cover of the book Pyrrho of Elis: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by Sarah D. Shields
Cover of the book War in the Hebrew Bible by Sarah D. Shields
Cover of the book The Militant Suffrage Movement by Sarah D. Shields
Cover of the book Flowing Tides by Sarah D. Shields
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of Eschatology by Sarah D. Shields
Cover of the book In Defense of Self by Sarah D. Shields
Cover of the book John F. Kennedy - With Audio Level 2 Factfiles Oxford Bookworms Library by Sarah D. Shields
Cover of the book Refuge by Sarah D. Shields
Cover of the book The American Dream by Sarah D. Shields
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy