Combative Politics

The Media and Public Perceptions of Lawmaking

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, Government
Cover of the book Combative Politics by Mary Layton Atkinson, University of Chicago Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Mary Layton Atkinson ISBN: 9780226442082
Publisher: University of Chicago Press Publication: April 27, 2017
Imprint: University of Chicago Press Language: English
Author: Mary Layton Atkinson
ISBN: 9780226442082
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication: April 27, 2017
Imprint: University of Chicago Press
Language: English

From the Affordable Care Act to No Child Left Behind, politicians often face a puzzling problem: although most Americans support the aims and key provisions of these policies, they oppose the bills themselves. How can this be? Why does the American public so often reject policies that seem to offer them exactly what they want?
            By the time a bill is pushed through Congress or ultimately defeated, we’ve often been exposed to weeks, months—even years—of media coverage that underscores the unpopular process of policymaking, and Mary Layton Atkinson argues that this leads us to reject the bill itself. Contrary to many Americans’ understandings of the policymaking process, the best answer to a complex problem is rarely self-evident, and politicians must weigh many potential options, each with merits and drawbacks. As the public awaits a resolution, the news media tend to focus not on the substance of the debate but on descriptions of partisan combat. This coverage leads the public to believe everyone in Washington has lost sight of the problem altogether and is merely pursuing policies designed for individual political gain. Politicians in turn exacerbate the problem when they focus their objections to proposed policies on the lawmaking process, claiming, for example, that a bill is being pushed through Congress with maneuvers designed to limit minority party input. These negative portrayals become linked in many people’s minds with the policy itself, leading to backlash against bills that may otherwise be seen as widely beneficial. Atkinson argues that journalists and educators can make changes to help inoculate Americans against the idea that debate always signifies dysfunction in the government. Journalists should strive to better connect information about policy provisions to the problems they are designed to ameliorate. Educators should stress that although debate sometimes serves political interests, it also offers citizens a window onto the lawmaking process that can help them evaluate the work their government is doing.
 

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

From the Affordable Care Act to No Child Left Behind, politicians often face a puzzling problem: although most Americans support the aims and key provisions of these policies, they oppose the bills themselves. How can this be? Why does the American public so often reject policies that seem to offer them exactly what they want?
            By the time a bill is pushed through Congress or ultimately defeated, we’ve often been exposed to weeks, months—even years—of media coverage that underscores the unpopular process of policymaking, and Mary Layton Atkinson argues that this leads us to reject the bill itself. Contrary to many Americans’ understandings of the policymaking process, the best answer to a complex problem is rarely self-evident, and politicians must weigh many potential options, each with merits and drawbacks. As the public awaits a resolution, the news media tend to focus not on the substance of the debate but on descriptions of partisan combat. This coverage leads the public to believe everyone in Washington has lost sight of the problem altogether and is merely pursuing policies designed for individual political gain. Politicians in turn exacerbate the problem when they focus their objections to proposed policies on the lawmaking process, claiming, for example, that a bill is being pushed through Congress with maneuvers designed to limit minority party input. These negative portrayals become linked in many people’s minds with the policy itself, leading to backlash against bills that may otherwise be seen as widely beneficial. Atkinson argues that journalists and educators can make changes to help inoculate Americans against the idea that debate always signifies dysfunction in the government. Journalists should strive to better connect information about policy provisions to the problems they are designed to ameliorate. Educators should stress that although debate sometimes serves political interests, it also offers citizens a window onto the lawmaking process that can help them evaluate the work their government is doing.
 

More books from University of Chicago Press

Cover of the book Insights in the Economics of Aging by Mary Layton Atkinson
Cover of the book Notebooks, English Virtuosi, and Early Modern Science by Mary Layton Atkinson
Cover of the book The Natural Goodness of Man by Mary Layton Atkinson
Cover of the book Trams or Tailfins? by Mary Layton Atkinson
Cover of the book The Global Work of Art by Mary Layton Atkinson
Cover of the book Lemons Never Lie by Mary Layton Atkinson
Cover of the book Shaping Phonology by Mary Layton Atkinson
Cover of the book Robert Schumann's Advice to Young Musicians by Mary Layton Atkinson
Cover of the book The Evidence for Evolution by Mary Layton Atkinson
Cover of the book Challenging Operations by Mary Layton Atkinson
Cover of the book God's Businessmen by Mary Layton Atkinson
Cover of the book Image and Myth by Mary Layton Atkinson
Cover of the book Not without Madness by Mary Layton Atkinson
Cover of the book Making the Mission by Mary Layton Atkinson
Cover of the book Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 29 by Mary Layton Atkinson
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy