China’s Insolvency Law and Interregional Cooperation
Comparative Perspectives from China and the EU
Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Bankruptcy, Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice, Business & Finance, Business Reference, Business Law
| Author: | Xinyi Gong | ISBN: | 9781351690904 |
| Publisher: | Taylor and Francis | Publication: | November 20, 2017 |
| Imprint: | Routledge | Language: | English |
| Author: | Xinyi Gong |
| ISBN: | 9781351690904 |
| Publisher: | Taylor and Francis |
| Publication: | November 20, 2017 |
| Imprint: | Routledge |
| Language: | English |
As a result of resumption of sovereignty over Hong Kong and Macao as well as the uncertain relationship between the Mainland and Taiwan, China has become a country composed of peculiar political compounds, resulting in four independent jurisdictions. This makes inter-regional legal cooperation a complicated yet compelling topic. Divided into five parts, this book considers possible solutions to problems in China’s inter-regional cross-border insolvency cooperation. These solutions are developed on the basis of two groups of comparative studies, including comparison among the cross-border insolvency systems of the four independent jurisdictions in China and comparison between EU Insolvency Regulation and the UNCITRAL Model Law. The author discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the two systems and presents original recommendations for the way forward. The book will be a valuable resource for academics and policy makers in insolvency law, Asian law and comparative law.
As a result of resumption of sovereignty over Hong Kong and Macao as well as the uncertain relationship between the Mainland and Taiwan, China has become a country composed of peculiar political compounds, resulting in four independent jurisdictions. This makes inter-regional legal cooperation a complicated yet compelling topic. Divided into five parts, this book considers possible solutions to problems in China’s inter-regional cross-border insolvency cooperation. These solutions are developed on the basis of two groups of comparative studies, including comparison among the cross-border insolvency systems of the four independent jurisdictions in China and comparison between EU Insolvency Regulation and the UNCITRAL Model Law. The author discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the two systems and presents original recommendations for the way forward. The book will be a valuable resource for academics and policy makers in insolvency law, Asian law and comparative law.
