Apollo and America's Moon Landing Program: Apollo Meteoroid Shielding Design and Analysis at the Manned Spacecraft Center

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Technology, Aeronautics & Astronautics, Science, Physics, Astrophysics & Space Science
Cover of the book Apollo and America's Moon Landing Program: Apollo Meteoroid Shielding Design and Analysis at the Manned Spacecraft Center by Progressive Management, Progressive Management
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Progressive Management ISBN: 9781301399918
Publisher: Progressive Management Publication: August 10, 2013
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Progressive Management
ISBN: 9781301399918
Publisher: Progressive Management
Publication: August 10, 2013
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

The Apollo program drove the development of spacecraft meteoroid protection in the U.S. and provided the core technology used on succeeding space programs. The uncertain likelihood of a mission-ending collision with a meteoroid and the unknown consequences of a collision with particles at the very large speeds typical of meteoroids made it crucial to better understand the risk of meteoroid impact. While there are extensive records of the design and analysis of the Apollo spacecraft meteoroid shielding, the information is spread across a variety of archives and personal files. This is the first report to assemble the sources into a technical history.

As in most technical developments, there was prior work - some of which was known and used by Apollo engineers and some unknown to them. The first meteoroid impact risk assessments that U.S. engineers made were for the artificial Earth satellite preliminary design study performed at RAND Corporation in 1946. The invention fundamental to spacecraft meteoroid protection was also made at that time. Perhaps the most important prior technical developments were the hypervelocity impact test facilities built from 1955 to 1962 for Department of Defense anti-ballistic missile programs. These facilities enabled the later design and qualification of the Apollo shielding. There were prior manned spacecraft meteoroid impact risk assessments made at National Aeronautics and Space Administration in 1960 for Mercury and circa 1963 for Gemini. However, the Mercury and Gemini analyses were performed at nearly the same time the Apollo meteoroid impact risk analyses were started. The first Apollo meteoroid impact risk assessment known was B.G. Cour-Palais' February 1962 analysis of the Lunar Module (LM) preliminary design for the Apollo contract statement of work (SOW).

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The Apollo program drove the development of spacecraft meteoroid protection in the U.S. and provided the core technology used on succeeding space programs. The uncertain likelihood of a mission-ending collision with a meteoroid and the unknown consequences of a collision with particles at the very large speeds typical of meteoroids made it crucial to better understand the risk of meteoroid impact. While there are extensive records of the design and analysis of the Apollo spacecraft meteoroid shielding, the information is spread across a variety of archives and personal files. This is the first report to assemble the sources into a technical history.

As in most technical developments, there was prior work - some of which was known and used by Apollo engineers and some unknown to them. The first meteoroid impact risk assessments that U.S. engineers made were for the artificial Earth satellite preliminary design study performed at RAND Corporation in 1946. The invention fundamental to spacecraft meteoroid protection was also made at that time. Perhaps the most important prior technical developments were the hypervelocity impact test facilities built from 1955 to 1962 for Department of Defense anti-ballistic missile programs. These facilities enabled the later design and qualification of the Apollo shielding. There were prior manned spacecraft meteoroid impact risk assessments made at National Aeronautics and Space Administration in 1960 for Mercury and circa 1963 for Gemini. However, the Mercury and Gemini analyses were performed at nearly the same time the Apollo meteoroid impact risk analyses were started. The first Apollo meteoroid impact risk assessment known was B.G. Cour-Palais' February 1962 analysis of the Lunar Module (LM) preliminary design for the Apollo contract statement of work (SOW).

More books from Progressive Management

Cover of the book Expanding Fixed-Wing Aircraft Capability in U.S. Army Aviation Operations - UH-60L Blackhawk, CH-47F Chinook, C-23B, C-27J, BCT, Intra-Theater Airlift, Joint Cargo Aircraft (JCA), Ground Force Support by Progressive Management
Cover of the book An Organizational Assessment of the United States Military's Ability to Control the Electromagnetic Spectrum in the 21st Century: Electronic Warfare, Titan Rain Attack by Chinese Hackers by Progressive Management
Cover of the book World War II: When the Japanese Bombed the Huertgen Forest: How the Army's Investigation of Pearl Harbor Influenced the Outcome of the Huertgen Forest, Gerow and Command of V Corps 1943-1945 by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 21st Century U.S. Military Documents: Air Force C-38 Courier Aircraft - Operations Procedures, Aircrew Evaluation Criteria, Aircrew Training Flying Operations by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 2009-2047 U.S. Air Force Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and UAV Flight Plan - Current Program, Action Plan, Nano, Micro, Man-Portable, Air-Launched, Predator, Reaper, Global Hawk, Raven by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Delegitimizing al-Qaeda: A Jihad-Realist Approach - Salafist, Sharia, Takfir by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Flight Research: Problems Encountered and What They Should Teach Us - Lunar Landing Research Vehicle, X-15, YF-12 Blackbird, P-51 Mustang, Lifting Bodies by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Helicopters in Irregular Warfare: Algeria, Vietnam, and Afghanistan - Counterinsurgency, COIN, American, French, Soviet Militaries, Airmobility and Political Goals in Combat by Progressive Management
Cover of the book An Evaluation of the Human Domain Concept: Organizing the Knowledge, Influence, and Activity in Population-Centric Warfare – Military Innovation, Development in Sea, Air, Space, and Cyber Domains by Progressive Management
Cover of the book America's Space Shuttle: Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) Systems NASA Astronaut Training Manual (EMU SYS 2102) by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Hole of Government: Sealing the Gap in U.S. Stability Operations - Machiavellian State Politics, Liberated or Occupied States, Germany World War II, Vietnam, Small Wars, State and Defense Department by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Integrated Defense (ID): Lessons Learned from Joint Base Balad - Iraq War's First Implementation of New Strategy for Air Base Defense in Combat, Patrols, Intelligence Support, Comparison to Vietnam by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Whole of Government Approach to Transnational Organized Crime (TOC): Where and How Does the Military Fit In? Case Studies of Colombia, Mexico, and Peacebuilding in Kosovo and Liberia by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Policing and Law Enforcement in COIN: the Thick Blue Line: Offensive Policing, Operational Design Considerations, Northern Ireland Troubles, Insurgents in India, Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Evaluation of the United States Drug War Policy Abroad: A Case Study in Colombia - Narco-Trafficking, Interdiction of Cocaine, Illicit Drugs, Blackmarket, FARC, ELN, AUC, Incentive in the Coca Trade by Progressive Management
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy