Active Assessment: Assessing Scientific Inquiry

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Science, Biological Sciences, Reference & Language, Education & Teaching
Cover of the book Active Assessment: Assessing Scientific Inquiry by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera, Springer New York
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera ISBN: 9780387896496
Publisher: Springer New York Publication: April 21, 2009
Imprint: Springer Language: English
Author: David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
ISBN: 9780387896496
Publisher: Springer New York
Publication: April 21, 2009
Imprint: Springer
Language: English

The term scienti?c inquiry as manifest in different educational settings covers a wide range of diverse activities. The differences in types of scienti?c inquiry can be organized along a continuum according to the degree of teacher control and intellectual sophistication involved in each type of inquiry. Types of scienti?c inquiry can also be de?ned according to whether they produce cultural knowledge or personal knowledge. Authentic scienti?c inquiry is de?ned according to ?ve characteristics: devel- ment of personal and cultural knowledge; contextualized scienti?c knowledge; the progression toward high-order problem solving; social interaction for s- enti?c goals; and scienti?c inquiry as a multi-stage and multi-representational process. The de?nition of scienti?c inquiry that forms the basis for the development of an assessment program consists of a two-part analytical frame: the de?nition of knowledge types relevant to scienti?c inquiry and the de?nition of an organi- tional frame for these knowledge types. Four types of knowledge are signi?cant for the de?nition of a speci?c s- enti?c inquiry program: cognitive knowledge, physical knowledge, represen- tional knowledge, and presentational knowledge. All four of these knowledge types are considered signi?cant. These four types of knowledge are organized in a framework that consists of two intersecting axes: the axis of knowledge types and the axis of stages of a s- ci?c scienti?c inquiry. This framework describes scienti?c inquiry as multi-stage process that involves the development of a series of in-lab outcomes (represen- tions) over an extended period of time.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The term scienti?c inquiry as manifest in different educational settings covers a wide range of diverse activities. The differences in types of scienti?c inquiry can be organized along a continuum according to the degree of teacher control and intellectual sophistication involved in each type of inquiry. Types of scienti?c inquiry can also be de?ned according to whether they produce cultural knowledge or personal knowledge. Authentic scienti?c inquiry is de?ned according to ?ve characteristics: devel- ment of personal and cultural knowledge; contextualized scienti?c knowledge; the progression toward high-order problem solving; social interaction for s- enti?c goals; and scienti?c inquiry as a multi-stage and multi-representational process. The de?nition of scienti?c inquiry that forms the basis for the development of an assessment program consists of a two-part analytical frame: the de?nition of knowledge types relevant to scienti?c inquiry and the de?nition of an organi- tional frame for these knowledge types. Four types of knowledge are signi?cant for the de?nition of a speci?c s- enti?c inquiry program: cognitive knowledge, physical knowledge, represen- tional knowledge, and presentational knowledge. All four of these knowledge types are considered signi?cant. These four types of knowledge are organized in a framework that consists of two intersecting axes: the axis of knowledge types and the axis of stages of a s- ci?c scienti?c inquiry. This framework describes scienti?c inquiry as multi-stage process that involves the development of a series of in-lab outcomes (represen- tions) over an extended period of time.

More books from Springer New York

Cover of the book Atlas of Pediatric Cutaneous Biodiversity by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
Cover of the book The Influence of Attention, Learning, and Motivation on Visual Search by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
Cover of the book Orbital Tumors by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
Cover of the book Anger and Aggression by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
Cover of the book Theories of Learning and Studies of Instructional Practice by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
Cover of the book Cognition, Metacognition, and Reading by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
Cover of the book Environmental Radiation Effects on Mammals by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
Cover of the book Advances in Systems Biology by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
Cover of the book Particle Filters for Random Set Models by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
Cover of the book Assessing and Treating Low Incidence/High Severity Psychological Disorders of Childhood by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
Cover of the book The Rho GTPases in Cancer by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
Cover of the book Global Optimization by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
Cover of the book Public Administration and Policy in the Middle East by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
Cover of the book Objective Structured Clinical Examinations by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
Cover of the book Handbook of Work Disability by David I. Hanauer, Graham F. Hatfull, Debbie Jacobs-Sera
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy