What Is at Stake in Building “Non-Western” International Relations Theory?

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Relations
Cover of the book What Is at Stake in Building “Non-Western” International Relations Theory? by Yong-Soo Eun, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Yong-Soo Eun ISBN: 9781351982696
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: January 12, 2018
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: Yong-Soo Eun
ISBN: 9781351982696
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: January 12, 2018
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

International Relations (IR) as a discipline is often deemed to be “too Western” centric. It has been argued that much of mainstream IR theory is “simply an abstraction of Western history.” In this respect, many IR scholars have called for “broadening” the theoretical horizon of IR while problematising the Western parochialism of the discipline, and it is increasingly acknowledged that IR needs to embrace a wider range of histories, experiences, and theoretical perspectives, particularly those outside of the West. However, despite such a meaningful debate over broadening the theoretical and practical horizons of IR, several critical questions remain unclear and under-explored. For example, does IR need to embrace pluralism? If so, how much? To what extent, and in what sense, is IR parochial? Should IR promote dialogue across theoretical and spatial divides? If so, how? Yong-Soo Eun addresses these questions. He undertakes a literature review and an empirical analysis of the extent to which the field has actually become diverse and pluralistic. This investigation considers diversity beyond the current limited focus on the geographical origins of theory. Yong-Soo also draws attention to the mechanisms and processes of knowledge production and transmission in IR. More importantly, he addresses what is probably the most acute issue associated with the “non-Western” IR theory-building enterprise; namely, fragmentation and dialogue. In conclusion, Yong-Soo notes that the role of unsettling the present hierarchical structure of the discipline falls to reflexive individual agents. He argues that in order for their agential power to be more fully harnessed in the opening up of IR, critical “self”-reflection and “collective” empathy and collaboration among marginalised scholars are all essential.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

International Relations (IR) as a discipline is often deemed to be “too Western” centric. It has been argued that much of mainstream IR theory is “simply an abstraction of Western history.” In this respect, many IR scholars have called for “broadening” the theoretical horizon of IR while problematising the Western parochialism of the discipline, and it is increasingly acknowledged that IR needs to embrace a wider range of histories, experiences, and theoretical perspectives, particularly those outside of the West. However, despite such a meaningful debate over broadening the theoretical and practical horizons of IR, several critical questions remain unclear and under-explored. For example, does IR need to embrace pluralism? If so, how much? To what extent, and in what sense, is IR parochial? Should IR promote dialogue across theoretical and spatial divides? If so, how? Yong-Soo Eun addresses these questions. He undertakes a literature review and an empirical analysis of the extent to which the field has actually become diverse and pluralistic. This investigation considers diversity beyond the current limited focus on the geographical origins of theory. Yong-Soo also draws attention to the mechanisms and processes of knowledge production and transmission in IR. More importantly, he addresses what is probably the most acute issue associated with the “non-Western” IR theory-building enterprise; namely, fragmentation and dialogue. In conclusion, Yong-Soo notes that the role of unsettling the present hierarchical structure of the discipline falls to reflexive individual agents. He argues that in order for their agential power to be more fully harnessed in the opening up of IR, critical “self”-reflection and “collective” empathy and collaboration among marginalised scholars are all essential.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Folklore, Literature, and Cultural Theory by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Supply Chain Development for the Lean Enterprise by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book The Healthy Edit by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Chaos theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Applied Statistics for the Social and Health Sciences by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Revival: State-Society Relations in Mexico (2001) by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Women and Property by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book The Downfall of the Gold Standard by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book A Social and Cultural History of Sport in Ireland by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Marxism Beyond Marxism by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Peacemaking in a Divided Society by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Neo-Piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Michel Foucault by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Japan's Economic Power and Security by Yong-Soo Eun
Cover of the book Quasi-Constitutionality and Constitutional Statutes by Yong-Soo Eun
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy