(Universal/University) 'ethics' with Kant, Hume, Hegel, Rousseau et al.?
A critical investigation into the 'thinking' and 'presentation' of white, male philosophers to students in Austria up to now (and forthcoming 2010)?
Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Gender Studies
| Author: | Georg Schilling | ISBN: | 9783640448982 |
| Publisher: | GRIN Publishing | Publication: | October 18, 2009 |
| Imprint: | GRIN Publishing | Language: | English |
| Author: | Georg Schilling |
| ISBN: | 9783640448982 |
| Publisher: | GRIN Publishing |
| Publication: | October 18, 2009 |
| Imprint: | GRIN Publishing |
| Language: | English |
Document from the year 2009 in the subject Women Studies / Gender Studies, University of Vienna (Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Menschenrechte), course: 'Ich kenne Kant ...'? - 'Quality' Management and Business 'Ethics' with KANT et al?, language: English, abstract: Why are we basically and regularly often only informed about the positive aspects of KANT? What about his opinion towards women? What about his scientific contemporary Prof Dr Anton Wilhelm AMO? What did KANT, HUME, et al, think of Afro-americans? What was KANT's, HEGEL's, or ROUSSEAU's opinion towards the Jewish minority? Why are students of law, e.g. in Vienna, be it at the University of Vienna, be it at the Vienna university of Economics and Business Adminstration, still often only 'informed' about positive sides, not any shadows of KANT, often called the 'master of critical (!) thinking'?
Document from the year 2009 in the subject Women Studies / Gender Studies, University of Vienna (Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Menschenrechte), course: 'Ich kenne Kant ...'? - 'Quality' Management and Business 'Ethics' with KANT et al?, language: English, abstract: Why are we basically and regularly often only informed about the positive aspects of KANT? What about his opinion towards women? What about his scientific contemporary Prof Dr Anton Wilhelm AMO? What did KANT, HUME, et al, think of Afro-americans? What was KANT's, HEGEL's, or ROUSSEAU's opinion towards the Jewish minority? Why are students of law, e.g. in Vienna, be it at the University of Vienna, be it at the Vienna university of Economics and Business Adminstration, still often only 'informed' about positive sides, not any shadows of KANT, often called the 'master of critical (!) thinking'?
