United Kingdom reforms of the law on the passing of property of a specific quantity of goods forming part of a bulk

Problems, reasons, solution and analysis

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Civil Law
Cover of the book United Kingdom reforms of the law on the passing of property of a specific quantity of goods forming part of a bulk by Lucie Novotna Krtousova, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Lucie Novotna Krtousova ISBN: 9783668432802
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: April 12, 2017
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Lucie Novotna Krtousova
ISBN: 9783668432802
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: April 12, 2017
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2012 in the subject Law - Civil / Private / Law of Obligation / Property Law, grade: 72, Cardiff University (School of Law), course: LLB Module Sales of Godds and Agency, language: English, abstract: In this essay I will analyse the appropriateness of the reform of the law on the passing of property of a specific quantity of goods forming part of a bulk by measuring it against its objectives, examining how far it solves the problems of the old law and considering the inconsistencies which introduces into the Sales law. Firstly, the problems of the law before the reform and the reasons for the reform will be discussed. Secondly, the law introduced by the reform will be described; and thirdly, the solution offered by the reform and its interaction with the rules on passing of property and passing of risk will be critically analysed. The author will argue that while the reform seemingly successfully responds to all problems of the old law, after scrutiny it is clear that the reform suffers from inconsistency and immanent injustice and fails to provide the intended protection to the buyer. Until September 1995 where a buyer bought a specified quantity forming part of an identified bulk, i.e. 250 tons of wheat from a named ship carrying a cargo of 500 tons, he could not acquire property in the goods until the goods were ascertained. This was result of a mandatory rule in s. 16 which provided that 'where there is a contract for the sale of unascertained goods no property in the goods is transferred to the buyer unless and until the goods are ascertained'. The most serious consequence of the mandatory rule in s. 16 was that the buyer did not acquire property in the goods even though he had paid for it and received a document purporting to be a document of title. If the seller became insolvent before the goods were ascertained, both the paid price and the goods in the bulk passed to the office-holder in insolvency for the benefit of secured creditors and the buyer happens to be merely an unsecured creditor with no proprietary claim to his goods. As follows the seller“s secured creditors might receive an undeserved windfall, because both the goods and the paid price might fall into the assets of the insolvent seller in liquidation. The Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act 1995 attempted to solve this undesirable situation by introducing an exception to s.16. In s. 20A (1) it was introduced that unless otherwise agreed the prepaying buyer purchasing specified quantity of an identified bulk acquires an undivided share in the bulk ad becomes a tenant in common of the bulk.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2012 in the subject Law - Civil / Private / Law of Obligation / Property Law, grade: 72, Cardiff University (School of Law), course: LLB Module Sales of Godds and Agency, language: English, abstract: In this essay I will analyse the appropriateness of the reform of the law on the passing of property of a specific quantity of goods forming part of a bulk by measuring it against its objectives, examining how far it solves the problems of the old law and considering the inconsistencies which introduces into the Sales law. Firstly, the problems of the law before the reform and the reasons for the reform will be discussed. Secondly, the law introduced by the reform will be described; and thirdly, the solution offered by the reform and its interaction with the rules on passing of property and passing of risk will be critically analysed. The author will argue that while the reform seemingly successfully responds to all problems of the old law, after scrutiny it is clear that the reform suffers from inconsistency and immanent injustice and fails to provide the intended protection to the buyer. Until September 1995 where a buyer bought a specified quantity forming part of an identified bulk, i.e. 250 tons of wheat from a named ship carrying a cargo of 500 tons, he could not acquire property in the goods until the goods were ascertained. This was result of a mandatory rule in s. 16 which provided that 'where there is a contract for the sale of unascertained goods no property in the goods is transferred to the buyer unless and until the goods are ascertained'. The most serious consequence of the mandatory rule in s. 16 was that the buyer did not acquire property in the goods even though he had paid for it and received a document purporting to be a document of title. If the seller became insolvent before the goods were ascertained, both the paid price and the goods in the bulk passed to the office-holder in insolvency for the benefit of secured creditors and the buyer happens to be merely an unsecured creditor with no proprietary claim to his goods. As follows the seller“s secured creditors might receive an undeserved windfall, because both the goods and the paid price might fall into the assets of the insolvent seller in liquidation. The Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act 1995 attempted to solve this undesirable situation by introducing an exception to s.16. In s. 20A (1) it was introduced that unless otherwise agreed the prepaying buyer purchasing specified quantity of an identified bulk acquires an undivided share in the bulk ad becomes a tenant in common of the bulk.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Obstacles to Strong Democracy - Prisoner's Dilemma and Free Rider Effect by Lucie Novotna Krtousova
Cover of the book Inequalities in Health by Lucie Novotna Krtousova
Cover of the book Mad Max - An Australian Cult Classic by Lucie Novotna Krtousova
Cover of the book Some Notes on Marko Kraljevic (Prince Marko) by Lucie Novotna Krtousova
Cover of the book Portraying the other by Lucie Novotna Krtousova
Cover of the book The United States Social Networking Market by Lucie Novotna Krtousova
Cover of the book Charismatic leadership - Adolf Hitler and the NS-state by Lucie Novotna Krtousova
Cover of the book Discussion of Lunds vision of an emerging norm of prevention in the context of the unfolding crisis in Zimbabwe by Lucie Novotna Krtousova
Cover of the book Interpretation of 'The Indian Burying Ground' by Philip Freneau by Lucie Novotna Krtousova
Cover of the book The (Mis?)-Representation of Women in Shakespeare's Comedies by Lucie Novotna Krtousova
Cover of the book Mergers and Acquisitions in the Global Pharmaceutical Industry by Lucie Novotna Krtousova
Cover of the book Link between trade liberalisation and economic growth by Lucie Novotna Krtousova
Cover of the book Methods of resolution designed to improve corporate governance by Lucie Novotna Krtousova
Cover of the book Physician-assisted suicide in the United States by Lucie Novotna Krtousova
Cover of the book Swedens Educational System by Lucie Novotna Krtousova
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy