The U.S.' and Israel's Securitization of Iran's Nuclear Energy

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Security
Cover of the book The U.S.' and Israel's Securitization of Iran's Nuclear Energy by Nassef M. Adiong, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Nassef M. Adiong ISBN: 9783640266197
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: February 12, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Nassef M. Adiong
ISBN: 9783640266197
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: February 12, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: A+, Technological University of the Philippines (International Studies), course: for college papers, 21 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Caveat: The title above is quite absurd due to the fact that in the traditional sense of defining security, any country aspiring for weapons of mass destruction or WMDs, which obviously nuclear used for developing weapons, is part and parcel of that nexus and is apparently a security issue; in other words it doesn't need the securitization process. It absolutely manifests the core concepts of traditional security which is akin to military, war, or what we should say high politics of hard power prior to the Cold War period. However, my conception of the above statement is merely a Western thought, though majority in the academia that specializes in international security accept that premise. One would ask if we can actually securitize a security issue. The answer is definitely no, because in the first place, it has been securitized and an extraordinary response was made to normalize the matter. The nuclear energy issue of Iran is a different case because it was foreseen as an unprecedented security matter by Israel and the United States in which Iran hasn't developed a culpable force of nuclear enrichment particularly uranium that would be used for military defence or political weapons as how the West reiterated this contention. The thin difference in securitizing Iran's nuclear energy ambition is looking at a causational link that made Iran decided to produce its own nuclear energy enrichment, which scholars have been debating on the intent and purpose of Iran. [...]

Nassef is a lifelong learner of comparative study between Islam and International Relations. He created the IR-IS Research Cohort on December 2012 that became Co-IRIS (International Relations and Islamic Studies Research Cohort) on November 2013. In addition to his service to profession, he founded the Philippine International Studies Organization (PHISO) on September 2015.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: A+, Technological University of the Philippines (International Studies), course: for college papers, 21 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Caveat: The title above is quite absurd due to the fact that in the traditional sense of defining security, any country aspiring for weapons of mass destruction or WMDs, which obviously nuclear used for developing weapons, is part and parcel of that nexus and is apparently a security issue; in other words it doesn't need the securitization process. It absolutely manifests the core concepts of traditional security which is akin to military, war, or what we should say high politics of hard power prior to the Cold War period. However, my conception of the above statement is merely a Western thought, though majority in the academia that specializes in international security accept that premise. One would ask if we can actually securitize a security issue. The answer is definitely no, because in the first place, it has been securitized and an extraordinary response was made to normalize the matter. The nuclear energy issue of Iran is a different case because it was foreseen as an unprecedented security matter by Israel and the United States in which Iran hasn't developed a culpable force of nuclear enrichment particularly uranium that would be used for military defence or political weapons as how the West reiterated this contention. The thin difference in securitizing Iran's nuclear energy ambition is looking at a causational link that made Iran decided to produce its own nuclear energy enrichment, which scholars have been debating on the intent and purpose of Iran. [...]

Nassef is a lifelong learner of comparative study between Islam and International Relations. He created the IR-IS Research Cohort on December 2012 that became Co-IRIS (International Relations and Islamic Studies Research Cohort) on November 2013. In addition to his service to profession, he founded the Philippine International Studies Organization (PHISO) on September 2015.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book The Use of Irony in Jane Austen's 'Pride and Prejudice' by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Swap and other structured products: Critical review of recent development as tool in financial risk management applications by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book The role of the IMF in general and its role in Kosova by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book 'The social responsibility of business...' - A position paper on Milton Friedman by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Europe's demographic development and the impact on the workforce by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book The lasting value of legal immigration for the United States of America by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book The Role of the Underwriter in the Initial Public Offering Process by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Security in the 21st century: US and European responses to global terrorism by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Die politische Ökonomie der russischen Wirtschaftspolitik in der Jelzin-Ära: State-Capture durch die 'Oligarchen'? by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book The use of inanimate subjects with the get-passive: A WebCorp study by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book IT Architecture and Risk Management by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book Turkey's quest for EU membership: Recent developments by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book The performance of the artist Marina Abramovi? in the MoMA - Museum of Modern Art, N.Y. as a mirror of zeitgeist by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book The Distribution Network of Volvo Cars Customer Service (VCCS) by Nassef M. Adiong
Cover of the book The Rosenbergs - Victims of their time? by Nassef M. Adiong
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy