Symbolic Legislation Theory and Developments in Biolaw

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Reference, Science & Nature, Science, Biological Sciences, Biology
Cover of the book Symbolic Legislation Theory and Developments in Biolaw by , Springer International Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9783319333656
Publisher: Springer International Publishing Publication: August 31, 2016
Imprint: Springer Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9783319333656
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Publication: August 31, 2016
Imprint: Springer
Language: English

This edited volume covers new ground by bringing together perspectives from symbolic legislation theory on the one hand, and from biolaw and bioethics on the other hand.

Symbolic legislation has a bad name. It usually refers to instances of legislation which are ineffective and that serve other political and social goals than the goals officially stated. Recently, a more positive notion of symbolic legislation has emerged in legislative theory. From this perspective, symbolic legislation is regarded as a positive alternative to the more traditional, top-down legislative approach. The legislature no longer merely issues commands backed up with severe sanctions, as in instrumental legislation. Instead, lawmakers provide open and aspirational norms that are meant to change behavior not by means of threat, but indirectly, through debate and social interaction.

Since the 1990s, biomedical developments have revived discussions on symbolic legislation. One of the reasons is that biomedical legislation touches on deep-rooted, symbolic-cultural representations of the biological aspects of human life. Moreover, as it is often impossible to reach consensus on these controversial questions, legislators have sought alternative ways to develop legal frameworks. Consequently, communicative and interactive approaches to legislation are prominent within the governance of medical biotechnology.

The symbolic dimensions of biolaw are often overlooked. Yet, it is clear that the symbolic is at the heart of many legal-political debates on bioethical questions. Since the rise of biomedical technologies, human body materials have acquired a scientific, medical and even commercial value. These new approaches, which radically question existing legal symbolizations of the human body, raise the question whether and how the law should continue to reflect symbolic values and meanings. Moreover, how can we decide what these symbolic values are, given the fact that we live in a pluralistic society?

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This edited volume covers new ground by bringing together perspectives from symbolic legislation theory on the one hand, and from biolaw and bioethics on the other hand.

Symbolic legislation has a bad name. It usually refers to instances of legislation which are ineffective and that serve other political and social goals than the goals officially stated. Recently, a more positive notion of symbolic legislation has emerged in legislative theory. From this perspective, symbolic legislation is regarded as a positive alternative to the more traditional, top-down legislative approach. The legislature no longer merely issues commands backed up with severe sanctions, as in instrumental legislation. Instead, lawmakers provide open and aspirational norms that are meant to change behavior not by means of threat, but indirectly, through debate and social interaction.

Since the 1990s, biomedical developments have revived discussions on symbolic legislation. One of the reasons is that biomedical legislation touches on deep-rooted, symbolic-cultural representations of the biological aspects of human life. Moreover, as it is often impossible to reach consensus on these controversial questions, legislators have sought alternative ways to develop legal frameworks. Consequently, communicative and interactive approaches to legislation are prominent within the governance of medical biotechnology.

The symbolic dimensions of biolaw are often overlooked. Yet, it is clear that the symbolic is at the heart of many legal-political debates on bioethical questions. Since the rise of biomedical technologies, human body materials have acquired a scientific, medical and even commercial value. These new approaches, which radically question existing legal symbolizations of the human body, raise the question whether and how the law should continue to reflect symbolic values and meanings. Moreover, how can we decide what these symbolic values are, given the fact that we live in a pluralistic society?

More books from Springer International Publishing

Cover of the book International Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Virtual Manipulatives by
Cover of the book Heidegger and the Lived Experience of Being a University Educator by
Cover of the book Surgery of Conotruncal Anomalies by
Cover of the book Creep in Ceramics by
Cover of the book Cartilage by
Cover of the book Efficient Design of Variation-Resilient Ultra-Low Energy Digital Processors by
Cover of the book Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation in Water Resources and Water Use Sectors by
Cover of the book Radiation Physics for Medical Physicists by
Cover of the book Contemporary Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction by
Cover of the book Brain Informatics by
Cover of the book Diseases of the Brain, Head and Neck, Spine 2016-2019 by
Cover of the book Forbidden Football in Ceausescu’s Romania by
Cover of the book Graphs in Biomedical Image Analysis, Computational Anatomy and Imaging Genetics by
Cover of the book An Anthropological Study of Hospitality by
Cover of the book Reading and Writing Experimental Texts by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy