Soviet Defensive Tactics At Kursk, July 1943

Nonfiction, History, Germany, European General, Military, United States
Cover of the book Soviet Defensive Tactics At Kursk, July 1943 by Colonel David M Glantz, Verdun Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Colonel David M Glantz ISBN: 9781786250438
Publisher: Verdun Press Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Verdun Press Language: English
Author: Colonel David M Glantz
ISBN: 9781786250438
Publisher: Verdun Press
Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Verdun Press
Language: English

In his classic work, On War, Carl von Clausewitz wrote, “As we shall show, defense is a stronger form of fighting than attack.” A generation of nineteenth century officers, nurtured on the study of the experiences of Napoleon and conditioned by the wars of German unification, had little reason to accept that view. The offensive spirit swept through European armies and manifested itself in the regulations, plans, and mentality of those armiehe events of 1939, 1940, and 1941 in Poland, France, and Russia respectively again challenged Clausewitz’ claim of the superiority of the defense and prompted armies worldwide to frantically field large armored forces and develop doctrines for their use. While blitzkrieg concepts ruled supreme, it fell to that nation victimized most by those concepts to develop techniques to counter the German juggernaut. The Soviets had to temper a generation of offensive tradition in order to marshal forces and develop techniques to counter blitzkrieg. In essence, the Soviet struggle for survival against blitzkrieg proved also to be a partial test of Clausewitz’ dictum. In July 1943, after arduous months of developing defensive techniques, often at a high cost in terms of men and material, the Soviets met blitzkrieg head-on and proved that defense against it was feasible. The titanic, grinding Kursk operation validated, in part, Clausewitz’ views. But it also demonstrated that careful study of force organization and employment and application of the fruits of that study can produce either offensive or defensive victory. While on the surface the events of Kursk seemed to validate Clausewitz’ view, it is often forgotten that, at Kursk, the Soviets integrated the concept of counteroffensive into their grand defensive designs. Thus the defense itself was meaningless unless viewed against the backdrop of the renewed offensive efforts and vice versa. What Kursk did prove was that strategic, operational, and tactical defenses could counter blitzkrieg.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In his classic work, On War, Carl von Clausewitz wrote, “As we shall show, defense is a stronger form of fighting than attack.” A generation of nineteenth century officers, nurtured on the study of the experiences of Napoleon and conditioned by the wars of German unification, had little reason to accept that view. The offensive spirit swept through European armies and manifested itself in the regulations, plans, and mentality of those armiehe events of 1939, 1940, and 1941 in Poland, France, and Russia respectively again challenged Clausewitz’ claim of the superiority of the defense and prompted armies worldwide to frantically field large armored forces and develop doctrines for their use. While blitzkrieg concepts ruled supreme, it fell to that nation victimized most by those concepts to develop techniques to counter the German juggernaut. The Soviets had to temper a generation of offensive tradition in order to marshal forces and develop techniques to counter blitzkrieg. In essence, the Soviet struggle for survival against blitzkrieg proved also to be a partial test of Clausewitz’ dictum. In July 1943, after arduous months of developing defensive techniques, often at a high cost in terms of men and material, the Soviets met blitzkrieg head-on and proved that defense against it was feasible. The titanic, grinding Kursk operation validated, in part, Clausewitz’ views. But it also demonstrated that careful study of force organization and employment and application of the fruits of that study can produce either offensive or defensive victory. While on the surface the events of Kursk seemed to validate Clausewitz’ view, it is often forgotten that, at Kursk, the Soviets integrated the concept of counteroffensive into their grand defensive designs. Thus the defense itself was meaningless unless viewed against the backdrop of the renewed offensive efforts and vice versa. What Kursk did prove was that strategic, operational, and tactical defenses could counter blitzkrieg.

More books from Verdun Press

Cover of the book Marines In World War II - Bougainville And The Northern Solomons [Illustrated Edition] by Colonel David M Glantz
Cover of the book Stalingrad To Berlin - The German Defeat In The East [Illustrated Edition] by Colonel David M Glantz
Cover of the book Slim Chance: The Pivotal Role Of Air Mobility In The Burma Campaign by Colonel David M Glantz
Cover of the book The Amphibians Came to Conquer: The Story of Richmond Kelly Turner Vol. I by Colonel David M Glantz
Cover of the book The Australian Victories In France In 1918 [Illustrated Edition] by Colonel David M Glantz
Cover of the book They Fought Alone by Colonel David M Glantz
Cover of the book Action in the East by Colonel David M Glantz
Cover of the book The Leadership Development Of Dwight D. Eisenhower And George S. Patton Jr. by Colonel David M Glantz
Cover of the book Operation Stalemate II by Colonel David M Glantz
Cover of the book Campaign Planning: A Doctrinal Assessment Through The Study Of The Japanese Campaign Of 1942 by Colonel David M Glantz
Cover of the book The Road To Stalingrad by Colonel David M Glantz
Cover of the book Claire Lee Chennault: Theorist And Campaign Planner by Colonel David M Glantz
Cover of the book Field Marshal William Slim And The Power Of Leadership by Colonel David M Glantz
Cover of the book Wake, War And Waiting… by Colonel David M Glantz
Cover of the book Green Armour by Colonel David M Glantz
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy