Sanskrit Debate

Vasubandhus "Vīmśatik" versus Kumrilas "Nirlambanavda"

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Methodology, Eastern Religions, Buddhism
Cover of the book Sanskrit Debate by William Cully Allen, Peter Lang
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: William Cully Allen ISBN: 9781454192466
Publisher: Peter Lang Publication: March 2, 2015
Imprint: Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers Language: English
Author: William Cully Allen
ISBN: 9781454192466
Publisher: Peter Lang
Publication: March 2, 2015
Imprint: Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers
Language: English

Sanskrit Debate: Vasubandhu’s ‘Vīmśatikā’ versus Kumārila’s ‘Nirālambanavāda’ illustrates the rules and regulations of classical Indian debate literature (pramānaśāstra) by introducing new translations of two Sanskrit texts composed in antithesis to each other’s tradition of thought and practice. In the third century CE, Vasubandhu, a Buddhist philosopher-monk, proposed that the entire world of lived experience is a matter of mind only through his Vīmśatikā (Twenty Verses). In the seventh century CE, Kumārila, a Hindu philosopher-priest, composed Nirālambanavāda (Non-Sensory Limit Debate) to establish the objective reality of objects by refuting Vasubandhu’s claim that objects experienced in waking life are not different from objects experienced in dreams. Kumārila rigorously employs formal rules and regulations of Indian logic and debate to demonstrate that Vasubandhu’s assertion is totally irrational and incoherent.
Vīmśatikā ranks among the world’s most misunderstood texts but Kumārila’s historic refutation allows Vīmśatikā to be read in its own text-historical context. This compelling, radically revolutionary re-reading of Vīmśatikā delineates a hermeneutic of humor indispensable to discerning its medicinal message. In Vīmśatikā, Vasubandhu employs the form of professional Sanskrit logic and debate as a guise and a ruse to ridicule the entire enterprise of Indian philosophy. Vasubandhu critiques all Indian theories of epistemology and ontology and claims that both how we know and what we know are acts of the imagination.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Sanskrit Debate: Vasubandhu’s ‘Vīmśatikā’ versus Kumārila’s ‘Nirālambanavāda’ illustrates the rules and regulations of classical Indian debate literature (pramānaśāstra) by introducing new translations of two Sanskrit texts composed in antithesis to each other’s tradition of thought and practice. In the third century CE, Vasubandhu, a Buddhist philosopher-monk, proposed that the entire world of lived experience is a matter of mind only through his Vīmśatikā (Twenty Verses). In the seventh century CE, Kumārila, a Hindu philosopher-priest, composed Nirālambanavāda (Non-Sensory Limit Debate) to establish the objective reality of objects by refuting Vasubandhu’s claim that objects experienced in waking life are not different from objects experienced in dreams. Kumārila rigorously employs formal rules and regulations of Indian logic and debate to demonstrate that Vasubandhu’s assertion is totally irrational and incoherent.
Vīmśatikā ranks among the world’s most misunderstood texts but Kumārila’s historic refutation allows Vīmśatikā to be read in its own text-historical context. This compelling, radically revolutionary re-reading of Vīmśatikā delineates a hermeneutic of humor indispensable to discerning its medicinal message. In Vīmśatikā, Vasubandhu employs the form of professional Sanskrit logic and debate as a guise and a ruse to ridicule the entire enterprise of Indian philosophy. Vasubandhu critiques all Indian theories of epistemology and ontology and claims that both how we know and what we know are acts of the imagination.

More books from Peter Lang

Cover of the book Accessing Audiovisual Translation by William Cully Allen
Cover of the book Black Women in Reality Television Docusoaps by William Cully Allen
Cover of the book Zum Ausdruck von Intentionen in deutschen und polnischen Geschaeftsbriefen aus kontrastiver Sicht by William Cully Allen
Cover of the book The Icon Debate by William Cully Allen
Cover of the book Zwischen englischsprachigem Studium und landessprachigem Umfeld by William Cully Allen
Cover of the book A Conceptual Blending Theory of Humour by William Cully Allen
Cover of the book A Web of New Words by William Cully Allen
Cover of the book Revealing Democracy by William Cully Allen
Cover of the book Re-engaging Disconnected Youth by William Cully Allen
Cover of the book Outils denseignement : au-delà de la baguette magique by William Cully Allen
Cover of the book Medienkollisionen und Medienprothesen by William Cully Allen
Cover of the book Deliktsrechtliche Insolvenzverursachungshaftung in der Ein-Personen-GmbH by William Cully Allen
Cover of the book Das kulturelle Gedaechtnis Europas im Wandel by William Cully Allen
Cover of the book Einfuehrung in die Aesthetik by William Cully Allen
Cover of the book Old Challenges and New Horizons in English and American Studies by William Cully Allen
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy