Religion-State Relations in the United States and Germany

The Quest for Neutrality

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Comparative, Constitutional
Cover of the book Religion-State Relations in the United States and Germany by Claudia E. Haupt, Cambridge University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Claudia E. Haupt ISBN: 9781139210072
Publisher: Cambridge University Press Publication: December 8, 2011
Imprint: Cambridge University Press Language: English
Author: Claudia E. Haupt
ISBN: 9781139210072
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publication: December 8, 2011
Imprint: Cambridge University Press
Language: English

This comparative analysis of the constitutional law of religion-state relations in the United States and Germany focuses on the principle of state neutrality. A strong emphasis on state neutrality, a notoriously ambiguous concept, is a shared feature in the constitutional jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court, but neutrality does not have the same meaning in both systems. In Germany neutrality tends to indicate more distance between church and state, whereas the opposite is the case in the United States. Neutrality also has other meanings in both systems, making straightforward comparison more difficult than it might seem. Although the underlying trajectory of neutrality is different in both countries, the discussion of neutrality breaks down into largely parallel themes. By examining those themes in a comparative perspective, the meaning of state neutrality in religion-state relations can be delineated.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This comparative analysis of the constitutional law of religion-state relations in the United States and Germany focuses on the principle of state neutrality. A strong emphasis on state neutrality, a notoriously ambiguous concept, is a shared feature in the constitutional jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court, but neutrality does not have the same meaning in both systems. In Germany neutrality tends to indicate more distance between church and state, whereas the opposite is the case in the United States. Neutrality also has other meanings in both systems, making straightforward comparison more difficult than it might seem. Although the underlying trajectory of neutrality is different in both countries, the discussion of neutrality breaks down into largely parallel themes. By examining those themes in a comparative perspective, the meaning of state neutrality in religion-state relations can be delineated.

More books from Cambridge University Press

Cover of the book Africa and World War II by Claudia E. Haupt
Cover of the book Modeling Volcanic Processes by Claudia E. Haupt
Cover of the book Operator Methods for Boundary Value Problems by Claudia E. Haupt
Cover of the book Modernism, Satire and the Novel by Claudia E. Haupt
Cover of the book Young Children and the Environment by Claudia E. Haupt
Cover of the book The Fruits of Freedom in British Togoland by Claudia E. Haupt
Cover of the book Habermas and Theology by Claudia E. Haupt
Cover of the book Disability and Political Theory by Claudia E. Haupt
Cover of the book Explaining the Performance of Human Resource Management by Claudia E. Haupt
Cover of the book Theory of the Firm for Strategic Management by Claudia E. Haupt
Cover of the book The Path to Sustained Growth by Claudia E. Haupt
Cover of the book The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface by Claudia E. Haupt
Cover of the book The Ethics of Armed Humanitarian Intervention by Claudia E. Haupt
Cover of the book The Cauchy-Schwarz Master Class by Claudia E. Haupt
Cover of the book The Cambridge Companion to Scottish Literature by Claudia E. Haupt
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy