Non-rhoticity and broad a in the Eastern New England dialect - a gender thing?

An analysis based on the US-series Family Guy

Nonfiction, Entertainment, Drama, Anthologies
Cover of the book Non-rhoticity and broad a in the Eastern New England dialect - a gender thing? by Alisa Westermann, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Alisa Westermann ISBN: 9783640935291
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: June 10, 2011
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Alisa Westermann
ISBN: 9783640935291
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: June 10, 2011
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,7, University of Münster (Englisches Seminar), course: American English, language: English, abstract: This paper describes an analysis of the Eastern New England dialect with concentration on the features of non-rhoticity and broad a. It examines the results by comparing the speakers' levels of non-rhoticity and broad a to the factor of their gender. On the one hand, I decided to examine the features of non-rhoticity and broad a, because these features are most prominent for this particular dialect of American English. 'Two major New England shibboleths are the 'dropping' of post-vocalic r(as in [ka:] car and [ba:n] barn) and the low central vowel [??] in the BATH class, words like aunt and glass.' (Carver, 1987: 21) On the other hand, I have recognized that there is a lack of examination of the mentioned features especially with regard to the speakers' gender and if these results would be conform with the sociolinguistic statement of women showing a stronger tendency towards standard or prestige variants in their speech communities. (Schönweitz, 2001: 2) As the basis of this analysis I decided to use speech data of the two main characters of the American television series Family Guy, which is known for being presented in the typical Eastern New England (ENE) dialect. The structure of my paper is divided into the following sections: an overview of the topic as well as the two features under examination, a description of the methodology used in this study and a section of the results which will take a look at my findings. Afterwards, a conclusion follows with implications on further research.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,7, University of Münster (Englisches Seminar), course: American English, language: English, abstract: This paper describes an analysis of the Eastern New England dialect with concentration on the features of non-rhoticity and broad a. It examines the results by comparing the speakers' levels of non-rhoticity and broad a to the factor of their gender. On the one hand, I decided to examine the features of non-rhoticity and broad a, because these features are most prominent for this particular dialect of American English. 'Two major New England shibboleths are the 'dropping' of post-vocalic r(as in [ka:] car and [ba:n] barn) and the low central vowel [??] in the BATH class, words like aunt and glass.' (Carver, 1987: 21) On the other hand, I have recognized that there is a lack of examination of the mentioned features especially with regard to the speakers' gender and if these results would be conform with the sociolinguistic statement of women showing a stronger tendency towards standard or prestige variants in their speech communities. (Schönweitz, 2001: 2) As the basis of this analysis I decided to use speech data of the two main characters of the American television series Family Guy, which is known for being presented in the typical Eastern New England (ENE) dialect. The structure of my paper is divided into the following sections: an overview of the topic as well as the two features under examination, a description of the methodology used in this study and a section of the results which will take a look at my findings. Afterwards, a conclusion follows with implications on further research.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Schule und Gewalt by Alisa Westermann
Cover of the book Stress - notwendiges Übel oder selbstgemachte Pein? by Alisa Westermann
Cover of the book Psychosoziale Diagnostik in der Sozialen Arbeit by Alisa Westermann
Cover of the book Widerstandsbestimmung mit Farbcode (Unterweisung Energieelektroniker / -in, Fachrichtung Anlagentechnik) by Alisa Westermann
Cover of the book CSR Overload? A Critical Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility from the Companies` and the Consumers` Point of View by Alisa Westermann
Cover of the book Wissenschaft revolutionieren by Alisa Westermann
Cover of the book Die Goldene Regel und der Kategorische Imperativ - ein Vergleich by Alisa Westermann
Cover of the book Ontologie - Der Begriff des 'Seins' in der Geschichte der Philosophie by Alisa Westermann
Cover of the book Populäre Religion by Alisa Westermann
Cover of the book Wissen im Wandel - Strategien, Wissensmodelle und Gefahren by Alisa Westermann
Cover of the book Wieso bricht Alex Normen? by Alisa Westermann
Cover of the book Zwei rivalisierende Standpunkte in der Kollokationsterminologie - Statistically oriented approach & significant oriented approach by Alisa Westermann
Cover of the book Semiotics of Law: Intent and Preparation with in a Semiosis Cycle by Alisa Westermann
Cover of the book Vom integrationsfähigen Lernförderschuler zur integrationsfähigen Schule by Alisa Westermann
Cover of the book Soziale Kompetenz - Ein Überblick über verschiedene Definitionen by Alisa Westermann
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy