Marvell's 'Horatian Ode' as a Political Poem

Fiction & Literature, Literary Theory & Criticism, British
Cover of the book Marvell's 'Horatian Ode' as a Political Poem by Stephanie Fuchs, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Stephanie Fuchs ISBN: 9783638315302
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: October 14, 2004
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Stephanie Fuchs
ISBN: 9783638315302
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: October 14, 2004
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2004 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Literature, grade: very good, University of Graz (Anglistics/American Studies), 12 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: The relationship of poetry to history is a most important one, since poems arise out of the process of history and are written by men who are living in that process. Andrew Marvell's Horatian Ode upon Cromwell's Return from Ireland undoubtedly is a poem of great artistry, but above all it provides an excellent example for political poetry of seventeenth century Great Britain. Since Marvell's poem deals with historical figures and comments on a historical occasion, there is a temptation to see the poem merely as a historical document. But while it is generally recognized that the poem provides a historical account of the period, it is indeed quite complex and by no means free of political judgement. As Brooks and Warren put in their essay on the poem, 'distinguishing between a poem as a work of art and a poem as a historical document seems necessary in order to explore the intimate relationship between them' (1950). While the prosodic majesty and metrical poise of Marvell's poem has sustained universal acclaim among critics, the attention of most students of Marvell's Horatian Ode has been directed towards questions about the political ideologies expressed in the poem. We know that Marvell was not only a poet but also a political figure, but there is still no real consensus as to what Marvell's political attitudes were 'really' like. The ambiguous political views and attitudes Marvell held throughout his lifetime seem to correspond with the political ambiguity in the Horatian Ode. Critics such as David Norbrook argue that the Horatian Ode 'clearly expresses great political commitment to Oliver Cromwell' (1990), while other interpretations stress that the Ode is quite explicit in its Royalist bias. Based on these readings, the question arises whether assuming that Marvell approves or disapproves of Cromwell in an ultimate sense would not mean to over-simplify the meaning of the poem. In the following paper, I will attempt to find out about the poem's engagement with the politics of its moment, the summer of 1650. I want to approach the Horatian Ode by means of an excursus devoted to the manner in which Marvell reflects on the historical occasion of Charles's beheading and Cromwell's subjugation of Ireland. Specifically, I will attempt to show that the poem expresses a highly ambivalent and ironic attitude, and that both Royalist principles and admiration for Cromwell's achievements are present in the poem.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2004 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Literature, grade: very good, University of Graz (Anglistics/American Studies), 12 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: The relationship of poetry to history is a most important one, since poems arise out of the process of history and are written by men who are living in that process. Andrew Marvell's Horatian Ode upon Cromwell's Return from Ireland undoubtedly is a poem of great artistry, but above all it provides an excellent example for political poetry of seventeenth century Great Britain. Since Marvell's poem deals with historical figures and comments on a historical occasion, there is a temptation to see the poem merely as a historical document. But while it is generally recognized that the poem provides a historical account of the period, it is indeed quite complex and by no means free of political judgement. As Brooks and Warren put in their essay on the poem, 'distinguishing between a poem as a work of art and a poem as a historical document seems necessary in order to explore the intimate relationship between them' (1950). While the prosodic majesty and metrical poise of Marvell's poem has sustained universal acclaim among critics, the attention of most students of Marvell's Horatian Ode has been directed towards questions about the political ideologies expressed in the poem. We know that Marvell was not only a poet but also a political figure, but there is still no real consensus as to what Marvell's political attitudes were 'really' like. The ambiguous political views and attitudes Marvell held throughout his lifetime seem to correspond with the political ambiguity in the Horatian Ode. Critics such as David Norbrook argue that the Horatian Ode 'clearly expresses great political commitment to Oliver Cromwell' (1990), while other interpretations stress that the Ode is quite explicit in its Royalist bias. Based on these readings, the question arises whether assuming that Marvell approves or disapproves of Cromwell in an ultimate sense would not mean to over-simplify the meaning of the poem. In the following paper, I will attempt to find out about the poem's engagement with the politics of its moment, the summer of 1650. I want to approach the Horatian Ode by means of an excursus devoted to the manner in which Marvell reflects on the historical occasion of Charles's beheading and Cromwell's subjugation of Ireland. Specifically, I will attempt to show that the poem expresses a highly ambivalent and ironic attitude, and that both Royalist principles and admiration for Cromwell's achievements are present in the poem.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book The Gatekeeper-Model of Innovation by Stephanie Fuchs
Cover of the book Public Relations for the Arts: What are the benefits? by Stephanie Fuchs
Cover of the book To what extent does Oliver Stone's Vietnam Trilogy represent the truth about the realities of the war? by Stephanie Fuchs
Cover of the book Ästhetik des Erhabenen Bei Pseudo-Longin und Christine Pries by Stephanie Fuchs
Cover of the book Does electronic commerce as a new distribution channel cause disintermediation or reintermediation or both? by Stephanie Fuchs
Cover of the book Thomas Jefferson and Slavery - Was He Really an Opponent of the Institution? by Stephanie Fuchs
Cover of the book Ein Vergleich der beiden Hauptcharaktere aus 'Markens Grøde' und 'Sein eigener Herr' in Bezug auf ihre Einstellung zur Familie by Stephanie Fuchs
Cover of the book The Balanced Scorecard - advantages and disadvantages by Stephanie Fuchs
Cover of the book Rap im Religionsunterricht by Stephanie Fuchs
Cover of the book 'Be nice or leave!' - Why is rap so violent? by Stephanie Fuchs
Cover of the book Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War in Sub-Saharan African Conflicts by Stephanie Fuchs
Cover of the book White men or Native Americans: Who are the real savages? by Stephanie Fuchs
Cover of the book 'The Beast with Two Backs'. Race and Racism in Shakespeare's 'Othello' by Stephanie Fuchs
Cover of the book Royal Caribbean Cruise Line (RCCL) - Brand plan for a new concept: The Aqua Theatre Café by Stephanie Fuchs
Cover of the book Changing way of career development by Stephanie Fuchs
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy