Good and bad practice in participatory research

'The best of both worlds: representativeness and insight?'

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science
Cover of the book Good and bad practice in participatory research by Cynthia Dittmar, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Cynthia Dittmar ISBN: 9783640378227
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: July 20, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Cynthia Dittmar
ISBN: 9783640378227
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: July 20, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2008 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Development Politics, grade: distinction, University of Manchester (Institute for Development Policy and Management), course: Development Research, language: English, abstract: Development research serves different purposes - from informing policy-making on a macro level, to conducting large scale poverty assessments of countries and regions, and planning, managing, evaluating and impact assessment of development projects and programs. Since the 1970s, participatory research methods have become increasingly important in this field. Whereas initially they were used to inform project practice on the micro-level, they are now also used to inform policy making and enhance governance. 'They moved from the margins of development practice to the very heart of development mainstream' (Mikkelsen 2005: 58). Participatory research can be seen as the methodological basis of participatory development. However, there is ongoing debate on whom those methods inform - the instrumental practice of aid/ governmental agencies ('participation as means') or the local communities themselves, providing them with the means to conduct their development ('participation as end'). This ambiguity is the main reason why a coherent definition of participatory development and research does not exist. The notion 'participatory' is blurred and definitions differ widely. Common to most definitions is the view that an active involvement of stakeholders will enhance development research and projects. An important advantage of participatory research is seen in the deeper insight into local life and needs. Chapter 2 of this paper will outline the different aspects of the concept and will discuss good and bad practices in participatory research, paying particular attention to the conflict between participation as means and as end. The wider scope of current participatory research led to the need for valid and robust data gathered through participative research methods which raises the question for the representat¬iveness of participatory gathered data. Chambers claims that participatory research can provide the 'best of both worlds' (2001: 25) - as it meets the requirements of deeper holistic insight represented by qualitative research and representativeness, represented by quantitative approaches. In Chapter 3 the scope of qualitative and quantitative approaches and to which extent Chambers claim is cogent will be discussed. Having analysed participation from those different analytical perspectives, this paper will argue that participation is a contested field and cannot meet expectations from all competing interests. [...]

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2008 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Development Politics, grade: distinction, University of Manchester (Institute for Development Policy and Management), course: Development Research, language: English, abstract: Development research serves different purposes - from informing policy-making on a macro level, to conducting large scale poverty assessments of countries and regions, and planning, managing, evaluating and impact assessment of development projects and programs. Since the 1970s, participatory research methods have become increasingly important in this field. Whereas initially they were used to inform project practice on the micro-level, they are now also used to inform policy making and enhance governance. 'They moved from the margins of development practice to the very heart of development mainstream' (Mikkelsen 2005: 58). Participatory research can be seen as the methodological basis of participatory development. However, there is ongoing debate on whom those methods inform - the instrumental practice of aid/ governmental agencies ('participation as means') or the local communities themselves, providing them with the means to conduct their development ('participation as end'). This ambiguity is the main reason why a coherent definition of participatory development and research does not exist. The notion 'participatory' is blurred and definitions differ widely. Common to most definitions is the view that an active involvement of stakeholders will enhance development research and projects. An important advantage of participatory research is seen in the deeper insight into local life and needs. Chapter 2 of this paper will outline the different aspects of the concept and will discuss good and bad practices in participatory research, paying particular attention to the conflict between participation as means and as end. The wider scope of current participatory research led to the need for valid and robust data gathered through participative research methods which raises the question for the representat¬iveness of participatory gathered data. Chambers claims that participatory research can provide the 'best of both worlds' (2001: 25) - as it meets the requirements of deeper holistic insight represented by qualitative research and representativeness, represented by quantitative approaches. In Chapter 3 the scope of qualitative and quantitative approaches and to which extent Chambers claim is cogent will be discussed. Having analysed participation from those different analytical perspectives, this paper will argue that participation is a contested field and cannot meet expectations from all competing interests. [...]

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Economics of criminology by Cynthia Dittmar
Cover of the book Conversation Analysis: Interruption by male or female speakers in a conversation - A case study by Cynthia Dittmar
Cover of the book Imperialism and Popular Culture Using Malta as a Case Study by Cynthia Dittmar
Cover of the book The Undermining of the American Dream through Illegal Immigration by Cynthia Dittmar
Cover of the book Iraq against the United States of America (events 2003-2004) by Cynthia Dittmar
Cover of the book How Jewish is the Jew of Malta? by Cynthia Dittmar
Cover of the book Hedging with Interest Rate Swaps and Currency Swaps by Cynthia Dittmar
Cover of the book EU Competition Policy by Cynthia Dittmar
Cover of the book The ERASMUS Programme of the European Union as Promoter of Tolerance Comparing Latvia to France and Switzerland by Cynthia Dittmar
Cover of the book Corporate Analysis 'Nebelhornbahn AG CS' by Cynthia Dittmar
Cover of the book Aborigines In Australia by Cynthia Dittmar
Cover of the book Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven: Her Life, Art and Postion in New York Dada by Cynthia Dittmar
Cover of the book Financial Crisis - Impacts and Reactions by Cynthia Dittmar
Cover of the book Human Rights in US Foreign Policy by Cynthia Dittmar
Cover of the book Male Rape in South African Prisons by Cynthia Dittmar
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy