Comments on Miguel Espinoza's Essay (2012) "Physics and the Intelligibility of Nature"

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Science, Other Sciences, Philosophy & Social Aspects, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy
Cover of the book Comments on Miguel Espinoza's Essay (2012) "Physics and the Intelligibility of Nature" by Razie Mah, Razie Mah
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Razie Mah ISBN: 9781942824534
Publisher: Razie Mah Publication: August 12, 2018
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Razie Mah
ISBN: 9781942824534
Publisher: Razie Mah
Publication: August 12, 2018
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

In Philosophy of Nature (1935), Jacques Maritain spends six full pages on Emile Meyerson, a contemporary French reactionary to Positivist judgment. Like Maritain Meyerson is concerned with the epistemology of phenomena. How does the scientific intellect work?
Miguel Espinoza, at the University of Strasborg, reviews and critiques Meyerson. Meyerson shows how the empirical sciences, such as physics, produces paradoxes. Espinoza claims that these paradoxes resolve when the scientist no longer fixates on identifying existence as "whatever is subject to causality". Both the scientific intellect and phenomena tap the same potential.
Models of the Positivist's and Aristotle's judgment, as well as empirio-schematics and Aristotle's injunction, are developed in Comments on Jacques Maritain's Book. Applied here, they open Espinoza's critique in surprising ways.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In Philosophy of Nature (1935), Jacques Maritain spends six full pages on Emile Meyerson, a contemporary French reactionary to Positivist judgment. Like Maritain Meyerson is concerned with the epistemology of phenomena. How does the scientific intellect work?
Miguel Espinoza, at the University of Strasborg, reviews and critiques Meyerson. Meyerson shows how the empirical sciences, such as physics, produces paradoxes. Espinoza claims that these paradoxes resolve when the scientist no longer fixates on identifying existence as "whatever is subject to causality". Both the scientific intellect and phenomena tap the same potential.
Models of the Positivist's and Aristotle's judgment, as well as empirio-schematics and Aristotle's injunction, are developed in Comments on Jacques Maritain's Book. Applied here, they open Espinoza's critique in surprising ways.

More books from Razie Mah

Cover of the book A Primer on Sensible and Social Construction by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Dennis Venema and Scot McKnight’s Book (2017) Adam and the Genome by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Boris Hennig's Essay (2008) "Substance, Reality and Distinctness" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Tomas Bogardus and Mallorie Urban’s Essay (2017) How to Tell... by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Joseph Carroll’s Chapter (2018) "Evolutionary Literary Theory" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book An Essay on Causality in the Empirical and Social Sciences by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Eric Santner’s Book (2016) The Weight of All Flesh by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Speculations on Thomism and Evolution by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on David Reich's Book (2018) Who We Are and How We Got Here by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer for Individual In Community by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Roger Teichmann’s Article (2016) The Identity of a Word by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Giovanni Maddalena's Essay (2017) "Jung and Peirce" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Joshua Lee Harris’s Essay (2017) Analogy in Aquinas by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer on Natural Signs by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Steven Mithen's Book (1996) The Prehistory of The Mind by Razie Mah
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy