A Primer on Implicit and Explicit Abstraction

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Logic, Reference & Language, Education & Teaching, Home Schooling
Cover of the book A Primer on Implicit and Explicit Abstraction by Razie Mah, Razie Mah
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Razie Mah ISBN: 9781942824145
Publisher: Razie Mah Publication: June 26, 2016
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Razie Mah
ISBN: 9781942824145
Publisher: Razie Mah
Publication: June 26, 2016
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

Primers 1-10 form a coherent set. Each develops concepts expressed in the foundatinal text: How to Define the Word “Religion”.
Primer 11 differs. It addresses a key question about institutions Institutions compose the content-level of the society tier. The question concerns abstraction. It involves the first singularity. The first singularity is originally proposed in An Archaeology of the Fall.
Here is the story: Humans evolved practicing implicit abstraction. Implicit abstraction fits hand and hand-speech talk. Explicit abstraction became available once humans adopted speech-alone talk. In our current Lebenswelt, humans speak through explicit abstraction and emotionally respond through implicit abstraction.
No wonder we are so messed up.
This primer joins comments on Novotny’s text. These constitute a home-schooling course at the high school and college levels. Comments on a book by John Deely completes this course. The title of the course is “Implicit and Explicit Abstraction”.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Primers 1-10 form a coherent set. Each develops concepts expressed in the foundatinal text: How to Define the Word “Religion”.
Primer 11 differs. It addresses a key question about institutions Institutions compose the content-level of the society tier. The question concerns abstraction. It involves the first singularity. The first singularity is originally proposed in An Archaeology of the Fall.
Here is the story: Humans evolved practicing implicit abstraction. Implicit abstraction fits hand and hand-speech talk. Explicit abstraction became available once humans adopted speech-alone talk. In our current Lebenswelt, humans speak through explicit abstraction and emotionally respond through implicit abstraction.
No wonder we are so messed up.
This primer joins comments on Novotny’s text. These constitute a home-schooling course at the high school and college levels. Comments on a book by John Deely completes this course. The title of the course is “Implicit and Explicit Abstraction”.

More books from Razie Mah

Cover of the book Comments on Thomas Hobbes Book (1651) The Leviathan Part 4 by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer on Natural Signs by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Father Reniero Cantalamessa’s (2016) Fourth Advent Sermon by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Lessons 13-24 for Instructor’s Guide to An Archaeology of the Fall and Related Scriptures by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Miguel Espinoza's Essay (2012) "Physics and the Intelligibility of Nature" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Peter Burfeind’s Book (2014) Gnostic America by Razie Mah
Cover of the book The Inevitable Twist: Comments on Lamoureux’s Question by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on James Madden’s Essay (2017) A Thomistic Theory of Intentionality by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Lessons 1-12 for Instructor’s Guide to An Archaeology of the Fall and Related Scriptures by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Zuckerman, Li and Diener's Article (2018) "Religion as an Exchange System" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Cheong Lee's Essay (2018) "Peirce's Theory of Interpretation" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Thomas Hobbes Book (1651) The Leviathan Part 3 by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Steven Mithen's Book (1996) The Prehistory of The Mind by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Sasha Newell's Article (2018) "The Affectiveness of Symbols" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Matthew Minerd’s Essay (2019) "Thomism and the Formal Object of Logic" by Razie Mah
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy