Are the parties in the United States still vehicles for environmental politics? How do they occupy this political field, and what ideological and sociological aspects affect this process?

Nonfiction, Entertainment, Drama, Anthologies
Cover of the book Are the parties in the United States still vehicles for environmental politics? How do they occupy this political field, and what ideological and sociological aspects affect this process? by Lars Dittmer, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Lars Dittmer ISBN: 9783638457736
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: January 18, 2006
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Lars Dittmer
ISBN: 9783638457736
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: January 18, 2006
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2005 in the subject American Studies - Culture and Applied Geography, grade: 1,7, University of Potsdam (Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät), course: Proseminar Politik und Gesellschaft in den USA, 11 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: 'There is nothing so American as our national parks. The scenery and wildlife are native. The fundamental idea behind the parks is native. The parks stand as an outward symbol of this great human principle'. These sentences are not extracted from the platform of the American Green Party - they are from a quote of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the 32nd President of the United States, a Republican. In his thinking, 'conservation was closely tied to American Values' (Sussman/ Daynes/ West 2001: 169). During his governing period, environmental care was directly incorporated in governmental action - various agencies and bureaucracies were established to deal with this topic. Today, the United States reject major international environmental treaties such as the Kyoto Protocol, requiring participants to reduce green house gases below the 1990 level by 2012. The Bush administration has presented plans to drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a swathe of land in northeast Alaska, populated by migratory birds, wolves and caribou. The House of Representatives had already approved these plans, the Senate rejected them. In voting George W. Bush their 43rd President, a majority of the American people made their cross for a candidate with a green record tending to zero. But not only does environmental policy seem to have left the political agenda on a larger scale, observers more and more get the impression that the American people seem to care lesser for environmental aspects than ten or twenty years ago - only considering, among many other factors, the increasing number of polluting light trucks and SUVs on American roads. So can we conclude that, considering the fact that the parties fight for the support of the American mainstream, both Democrats and Republicans have banned environmental politics from their platforms? This paper is to figure out to what extent the field of environmental policy still is a factor in the American political landscape and what ideological and sociological factors are at play in this process and in the party-internal treatment of the topic.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2005 in the subject American Studies - Culture and Applied Geography, grade: 1,7, University of Potsdam (Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät), course: Proseminar Politik und Gesellschaft in den USA, 11 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: 'There is nothing so American as our national parks. The scenery and wildlife are native. The fundamental idea behind the parks is native. The parks stand as an outward symbol of this great human principle'. These sentences are not extracted from the platform of the American Green Party - they are from a quote of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the 32nd President of the United States, a Republican. In his thinking, 'conservation was closely tied to American Values' (Sussman/ Daynes/ West 2001: 169). During his governing period, environmental care was directly incorporated in governmental action - various agencies and bureaucracies were established to deal with this topic. Today, the United States reject major international environmental treaties such as the Kyoto Protocol, requiring participants to reduce green house gases below the 1990 level by 2012. The Bush administration has presented plans to drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a swathe of land in northeast Alaska, populated by migratory birds, wolves and caribou. The House of Representatives had already approved these plans, the Senate rejected them. In voting George W. Bush their 43rd President, a majority of the American people made their cross for a candidate with a green record tending to zero. But not only does environmental policy seem to have left the political agenda on a larger scale, observers more and more get the impression that the American people seem to care lesser for environmental aspects than ten or twenty years ago - only considering, among many other factors, the increasing number of polluting light trucks and SUVs on American roads. So can we conclude that, considering the fact that the parties fight for the support of the American mainstream, both Democrats and Republicans have banned environmental politics from their platforms? This paper is to figure out to what extent the field of environmental policy still is a factor in the American political landscape and what ideological and sociological factors are at play in this process and in the party-internal treatment of the topic.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Al-Qa'ida in Saudi Arabia 2003 and 2004 by Lars Dittmer
Cover of the book Competition Policy in Bulgaria by Lars Dittmer
Cover of the book Europe's demographic development and the impact on the workforce by Lars Dittmer
Cover of the book Lexical Relations: Homonymy by Lars Dittmer
Cover of the book The Construction of the Plot in `King Lear´ by Lars Dittmer
Cover of the book Differences between US and German / Austrian Cost Accounting by Lars Dittmer
Cover of the book Cultural Clash and Cultural Due Diligence at DaimlerChrysler by Lars Dittmer
Cover of the book Values - A Cultural Axiomatic by Lars Dittmer
Cover of the book The Concept Of Spam In Email Communication by Lars Dittmer
Cover of the book Schreiben in der Geographie - Eine explorative Untersuchung zum studentischen Schreiben in der Physischen Geographie by Lars Dittmer
Cover of the book Comparison of the Womens Movement in Eastern Germany and the Czech Republic by Lars Dittmer
Cover of the book Maintaining a Global Communication Network by Lars Dittmer
Cover of the book Regionale Autonomie als Folge politischer Entwicklungen in Indonesien seit 1998 by Lars Dittmer
Cover of the book Lizenzen in der Insolvenz des Lizenzgebers by Lars Dittmer
Cover of the book Slang and lexical language change - an ad hoc corpus analysis by Lars Dittmer
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy